[Presidential Adress] Canada, Choose YOUR Future!
DMV3
My fellow Canadians,
I came into office with a set of finite goals for our nation, and your government has been working very hard to make those goals a reality. In the media recently there has been a great dissatisfaction with how our government handled obtaining trial membership in CoT. This dissatisfaction lays entirely on me and not with those working hard for this government. I take responsibility for those actions and I would like to take the time to explain them to the people of Canada to the best of my ability without divulging sensitive information to our enemies.
Several months ago our government and the government of the eUS had a falling out. How this happened is apparently a subject of great debate amongst the people of Canada, though for our purposes the why is irrelevant. Upon being elected one of my greatest responsibility was to help Canada rebuild this relationship and expand our international influence. Up until recently there had been one major obstacle to a closer relationship with the US, their relationship with Spain.
Last week an opportunity arose to not only rebuild this relationship, but to also make Canada stronger long term. Last week in retaliation for an inadvertent NE proposal by Mexico of Poland, Spain issued their own NE proposal of Mexico and quickly passed it even as Mexico voted down their proposal. This event may seem insignificant to the casual player, but to me it signified the single most significant event in US/Canadian relations since our falling out all those months ago.
You see, the US and CoT nations in ROLA had been under the impression Spain was actually their friend. Those illusions were shatter, and even the training war designation has not changed the situation. It was this change that led me to begin discussions with our Military leaders, the Cabinet, and Congress about applying for trial membership in CoT. I would like to apologize again for rushing into this, but as you can see there were reasons for that rush.
To help Canada recover from my mistake, I am conducting a foreign policy survey to ensure I know the will of the people of Canada moving forward. Please take the time to fill out the survey and help your government help you. Over the next couple of day I will also be sending PMs out to ensure everyone has a chance to be heard.
Hail Canada!
DMV3
Canadian CP
Comments
First, time to read.
Meh, not entirely what I expected.
Voted I suppose.
Curious to see how far american friendship extends when u leave office.
Not far because apparently we can't be trusted to elect our own CPs.
"... about applying for trial membership in CoT. I would like to apologize again for rushing into this, but as you can see there were reasons for that rush."
These reasons are Spain NE'd Mexico after Mexico NE'd Spain's biggest ally Poland first = Spain can't be trusted and Canada would be better of joining CoT sooner rather than later....?
First of, Spain-Canada now have a treaty don't they, so Spain are unlikely to turn on Canada at this point, just as long as you's don't AS Polska or something. Second, what has the -- arguably -- justified Spanish attack on Mex got to do with Canada? (Yeah I know the Mex NE was an "illegal" proposal according to alliance HQ, but it still nearly passed in Mexican congress). I don't understand how a war happening between ROLA nations that has no bearing on eCanadian national security is a legitimate reason to tie Canada to CoT?
Voted btw 😛
"Last week in retaliation for an inadvertent NE proposal by Mexico of Poland, Spain issued their own NE proposal of Mexico and quickly passed it even as Mexico voted down their proposal. This event may seem insignificant to the casual player, but to me it signified the single most significant event in US/Canadian relations since our falling out all those months ago."
Interesting. I recall eCan and eUS doing the same thing with NE proposals. eCan voted theirs down, just like eMexico, but eUS did not vote theirs down, just like eSpain.
"To help Canada recover from my mistake, I am conducting a foreign policy survey to ensure I know the will of the people of Canada moving forward. Please take the time to fill out the survey and help your government help you. "
Have you considered apologizing? That would go far. There was a survey done recently and the country agreed to a treaty with eSpain, as a CP candidate you are expected to be aware of this. There was a time when eUS and eCan were tightly aligned, but that moment passed long ago. This is not the home of the brave, this is the true north strong and free.
haha, I hope he does not apologize
Really CoT is probably going to be the Alliance the most people vote for, we just don't like having no say when the decision is made.
I would prefer to be in ACT, we have already capitulated to TWO and have the stink of submission all over ourselves. Why not ally with the stronger of two evils? CoT is more dysfunctional and less organized.
"but to also make Canada stronger long term" how is joining a weaker alliance then TWO going to help the country? will USA government help us take out Spain from eCan, I don't think so, all eCan is doing is risking itself for more invasion after finanlly signing a NAP
Agreed. eCan joined a weak alliance for the "intangibles" and it didn't work out. IMO, Asgard is better than CoT because it has upside potential, CoT has no upside potential. CoT is not well organized and inferior to TWO in might. eCan is not going to have a seat near the head of the table in any alliance and the TWO alliance is sophisticated enough to recognize this and have a sub-group called ACT. Heck, TWO may even let us duke it out with our buddies from UK on occasion for training wars.
Sorry Addy, but where are you getting your information? CoT is very well organized. That's how they've been able to fight TWO so well before this Epic tournament. I've seen it first hand in HQ - they really have their shit together. Additionally, all members of CoT are treated equally which would give us a seat at the head of the table if accepted and accept CoT beyond the trial period.
I agree with both of you, Addy: CoT is weaker and less organized.
However, I have also witnessed it first hand and this is not to say that CoT ISNT organized. They are very organized, the problem is that TWO is only just slightly MORE organized, and has more firepower to throw around.
CoT is fairly good with equality as of late, working to free smaller members, joint operations, etc.
So both good points
I disagree that TWO is organized to the level of CoT. They overpower CoT by a tremendous amount, but CoT's organization and coordination has made pushing them back possible.
It was the money CoT, specifically the eUS, were recently throwing at wars that made pushing TWO back possible. Nothing to do with superior organisation. As long as there's a lucrative CO, people will fight in it, even TWO/proTWO fighters.
There's no way any major CoT nations have the kind of coordination of a SPoland or have been able to work as effectively as Gre/Arg or Serb/Arg have recently. Arg were able to wipe most of South America at one point because of this and Greece have been almost unbeatable for months because of the round-the-clock threat that Arg give them. How do CoT even compare?
No one is blaming the people that are with you and are doing there best.
it is you we blame for the rush and talkung to us!
No more trying to pass blaim!!
This game needs a thumb down button that lets us vote you down... After 5 thumbs down the comment should be deleted or hidden.
Did he Bloop again?
lool Pants.. indeed he did....
I sincerely hope there isn't. Imagine the political brigades devoted to thumb down comments.
Let IRC be the only barren wasteland
Transparency is the key.
keeping the people in the loop is key.
Respecting people enough to trust their judgement is key.
I did something similar on my term.. I halted talks with eSpain to declare war on eSpain when they launched their very first attack on the states.
I made a large article explaining everything and ensured that everyone knew why I did it and all the details.
Because I informed everyone what was going on, Why and what may or may not come from it I got the overwhelming support from the country for the action.
It just comes down to respect. Yes sometimes you have to do things on the spur as you are put into a "this second or never" situation (I dont thing the COT alliance was one of those situations that couldnt wait a day..) But keeping the people fully updated and in the process is absolutely key.
I was so upset when I found out we were ALREADY in the COT trial from a player NOT EVEN IN GOVERNMENT.
I should be hearing this from you... In an address... not from someone that found out from someone else who is in the cabinet.
Then maybe read the media more? I put out an article before the summit and one shortly after the summit explaining exactly what had happened.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-presidential-address-an-update-and-our-future-2318132/1/20
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-presidential-update-cot-trial-membership-ato-and-the-brolliance-2318723/1/20
I'm not sure how much more I can communicate with the people. Communication is a two way street, it's my responsibility to tell the people what is happening and it is their responsibility to actual pay attention. I have personally wrote 4 articles in the last 12 days plus all the media my cabinet has put forward. I think the issue is less about a lack of communication than it is a hostile group of people attempting to hijack the discussion for their own political gain.
TL😃R
TL😃R of my article is
Grumble mumble bumble... BARK!!! growl...
I was talking about your usual windbag comment lol
Says the redcoat. Booooo.
CoT will get a pretty faifthfull ally that if history is any judge is willing to sacrifice our own lands and wealth to prove we are a faithful ally.
So I know what they get
but
What do we get in return from CoT?
Will they help us recover our remaining territories either through diplomacy or force?
As an uninformed eRep player I cant answer a survey until I know what we get out of it
CoT is as committed to helping us as we are to helping them. CoT is an alliance that holds all members on equal footing, so we will get out of CoT exactly what we put into it. Discussions are underway to ensure that Canada will be made whole again in the future, but this isn't going to happen tomorrow. Things in this game tend to go one of two ways, either super fast or really slow. I can ensure you that when the time is right Canada will be whole again, but we must be patient and wait for the right time to arise.
is this you saying that if eCan commits to CoT then eUSA government will help eCan kick out eSpain?
I'm saying that the foreign relations path we are currently on will get us all of eCanada back in the long run.
There were words written, yet nothing was said. Impressive in a completely unhelpful way.
Some play the game. Others are just here to feed their little egos.
http://prntscr.com/1s1783
http://stonedlizard.com/images/2012/09/14/cat-ego.jpg
A day late and a dollar short, once again. You speak of a 'hostile group of people attempting to hijack the discussion for their own political gain.' yet all you ever do is make decisions for the nation and then write a bunch of articles trying to explain them away. You had given NO indication that you were going to force us into CoT trial membership. You turned back on a campaign pledge and you say it's because of the Mexico/Spain NE business?! You must think we are some of the most gullible people around.
Truly, all you're doing is alienating a large percentage of the population. You do things in secret, then when people get pissed you come out and give your explanation thinking that should be enough to satiate our little minds.
Your very presence in our nation is an insult to us. The fact that you show up here a week before CP elections, buy votes by making a deal with the CPF and then lord over us like a king as opposed to an elected representative is absolutely disgusting. You should take your brand of politics back down south where it seems to have served you so well.
The butthurt is strong in this one. The leader of MDP calling me a tyrant is ironic, I like it.
I'm the least tyrannical PP of the MDP tbh. Is it still butthurt when it's a legitimate complaint? I like how you do nothing to actually address the issues, or apologize. Just decide to come out with more meaningless legislation for your sellout congress to pass. All in the interests of 'looking good'.
My sell out Congress? I didn't even vote in the election where they took office. Also I believe your party's Congress delegation supported the move to join CoT. It seems your issue is with a Congress that people elected to represent them actually deciding what is best for this nation. Maybe you should get your people in order if you don't like what Congress is doing.
One of my delegation did, yes. The vote took place in secret before I was PP however. Fair enough. I don't know what you've promised CPF but they are obviously backing you full bore, indeed they did so midway through the CP election. Right after that blooped character showed up writing a very inflammatory pro-IBB93 article. When you connect all the various dots, they all point to one thing. Shenanigans.
"us" being...?
Leo and his imaginary friends? 😉
I don't know. I understand the need and the necessity to represent a group, Leo is a Party President after all. But it wouldn't hurt to specify.
"Several months ago our government and the government of the eUS had a falling out."
More than a year. More than a year that the USA has held on to their butthurt. Not a few months.
"Up until recently there had been one major obstacle to a closer relationship with the US, their relationship with Spain."
So are you saying that the USA and Spain are no longer silent partners? Nothing has been communicated on either end that anything to that effect has transpired.
The Spainish attack on Mexico was written off as a training war. No serious attack or political shift was made. You are grabbing at smoke to justify a sudden, unvetted, unaccountable action that clearly is in the benefit of your home country while actual putting Canada at risk.
This is all a 'It's better to ask for forgiveness, then to ask for permission.' approach.
The manner that you have signed us up for CoT is the issue. No understanding of our place in the alliance, expectations of us, what we can truly expect of CoT and most of all, what is realistically being done to completely free us from Spain. None of those answers are going to come out of a survey done after the train wreak you set in motion. These are matters that should have been discussed before hand.
It's sad to see your farce of a survey used as a continued delay tactic to answer some serious questions about the situation you have gotten us into.
Foxfire, I can not give you specifics on Spain and Mexico/US relations because despite what I know this would violate the trust of our allies and jeopardize future plans. If you think this was about putting Canada in danger to protect the US you clearly have no idea what is going on in the world.
"None of those answers are going to come out of a survey done after the train wreak you set in motion. These are matters that should have been discussed before hand." What train wreck? Ten people who don't like this path whining about it isn't a train wreck.
As far as the questions you have asked answers have been provided, if those are not to your liking I'm sorry, but I can not give you more information at the expense of our security and the security of our allies. You act like you have no idea how Foreign Affairs works, because if you did you would realize that some things happen/ are discussed that should not be made public before they are implemented.
The Big Brother politics may fly in the USA, but you clearly entertained into a political environment that you didn't bother to learn about before hand. I can appreciate your frustration, but even in your responses we can tell that you just don't get how uncharacteristic your secret politics, especially for foreign matters, is of a Canadian CP. Some latitude may have been given in this matter IF you had the trust of the Canadian people, but the majority don't even know you much less trust you. You got elected with a recognized Canadian party's support and for having a higher level than the runner up, not your own merits nor any reputation built among the majority of Canadians. It would have been wise to have been mindful of these realities.
laaawl!! Owned!!!!! Apply ice to burnt area
Actually once the votes were finalized I won by one vote not by a tie, but thanks for the efforts all the same. 😉
i could take the survey if I knew what I was talking about
This is Canada, there is no need to know what you are talking about in order to give your opinion to anyone that will listen. 😉