Join the new world

原文連結：To follow or not to follow.....the status quo
原作者：eDarkAngel


Why is EDEN (Greece) attacking Bulgaria?
為什麼EDEN(希臘)要攻擊保加利亞？

The simple answer is for daring to challenge the status quo.
其實答案很簡單：因為保加利亞嘗試改變現狀。

However as in RL, things are never so simple. So let's look at the bigger picture for a moment.
然而在現實生活中事情並不會這麼單純。所以先讓我們以更高的層次來看這件事情吧。

It is generally assumed the strongest countries/core and so on of EDEN are Croatia, Romania and Greece. That however is only true if you look at the population and damage stats, in reality they're the weak point of EDEN and the weakest link.
一般公認EDEN中實力最強/核心國有克羅埃西亞、羅馬尼亞和希臘。但這只有以人口數和傷害輸出層面來講是對的，但事實上他們是EDEN中最脆弱的一環關係也最不緊密。

Simple reason for that is the eternal wars with equal or stronger opponents on their borders which they cannot sustain on their own. Basic example is this:
原因很簡單，在邊界遭遇相同或更強的敵人時，他們沒辦法獨自打贏持久戰。下面是最簡單的例子：

Croatia, has a big deficit and will likely always do against Serbia.
Romania at best has a negligible advantage against Hungary currently but throughout history the dynamics have been equal, with the one side prevailing because of their allies mostly.
Greece often having a deficit, right now slight deficit to Macedonia.
克羅埃西亞對塞爾維亞的紛爭中嚴重的居於劣勢，並且有可能一直這樣下去。
羅馬尼亞現在對抗匈牙利最多只能獲得微不足道的利益，但綜觀歷史而言是持平的，因為不論哪一方的優勢都是來自於其聯盟。
希臘常常居於劣勢，而現在面對馬其頓則些微的居於下風。

The sum is that these 3 countries are in deficit against their main rivals, they're in essence useless to any alliance on their own as they have a deficit of damage to begin with on a daily basis.
結論就是，這3個國家面對主要敵人總是居於下風，而這三個國家中的任一個對於任何聯盟在實質上都是沒有助力的，因為他們每日的基礎輸出上都有所不足。

The solution is to recruit other countries to compensate this deficit and to bring additional damage above that so they can win in turn. This means either countries which have no opponent/no equal opponent or countries that will sacrifice their own security and ambitions and transfer their damage to the big 3.
解決之道就是召集其他國家來彌補火力的不足，並且利用過剩的火力來贏得一連串的戰爭。這意味著三巨頭的火力不是來自於沒有敵手的國家就是來自於犧牲國防及雄心的國家。

Poland plaid that role for a long time, while Span was dominating and USA friendly or neutral, Spain played that role too, Sweden did, so did USA itself. All of them are no longer members of EDEN.
當西班牙正處於領導地位而美國則抱持著友善或中立的態度時，波蘭已經扮演著這個角色很長一段時間。而西班牙、瑞典也都曾扮演著相同的角色。但他們都早已不是EDEN會員國。

Australia was another example, Bosnia was a damage drain (ironically Bosnia was permanently deleted during most of their time in EDEN, but have enjoyed quite good times since exciting the alliance, though they will always be dependent on EDEN).
澳洲則是另外一個例子，波斯尼亞和黑塞哥維那總是需要火力支援(諷刺的是，波斯尼亞和黑塞哥維那在身為EDEN會員國時總是長期的處於滅國狀態，但仍度過了不錯的時光，因為他們的存在活絡了聯盟，雖然他們總是需要EDEN的支持。)

Bulgaria initially had the same role as well, being thrown at whichever front it was needed to compensate, be it against Turkey for Greece (oh the irony) or against Macedonia, again for Greece (more irony?), against Serbia for Croatia (NAP or excursion to north America anyone?), against Hungary or Poland for Romania.
保加利亞一開始也是扮演著同樣的角色，總是被推到火力不足的戰線上彌補差距。為希臘抵抗土耳其(真諷刺)，然後再一次的為希臘抵抗馬其頓(更諷刺)，為克羅埃西亞對抗塞爾維亞(有沒有午休或是到北美的遠足啊？)，幫克羅埃西亞對抗匈牙利或波蘭。

Only after Bulgaria stopped being the docile servant and actually started making some rational and tactically sound decisions that actually EDEN started getting out of the whole dug by the incompetence of the ruling oligarchy, along with EDEN it meant good times for TERRA.
只有在保加利亞決定不再當個乖順的僕人，開始實際做出些理智的、戰術性的決定之後才把EDEN從被火力不足的國家所掌控的困境中給解救出來，此時對Terra而言也是美好的時光。

TERRA of course is a service alliance to EDEN, the relationship is mutual dependance of course, because without EDEN TERA cannot fight off ONE, but for the most part TERRA is donating damage to EDEN in it's wars as most TERRA countries have excess damage on their fronts (Brazil + USA) outweigh Spain by a large margin. Argentina is such a hot commodity, because of the lack of an opponent which means they're great servant country to donate damage and why they get courted so much, but usually get tricked with propaganda tricks (case with Chile, the whole conflict was well orchestrated as it served Turkish foreign policy).
Terra當然是EDEN的救火盟友，他們之間絕對是完全的共生關係，因為一旦少了EDEN，Terra就沒有辦法獨自對抗ONE，但絕大多數的情況是Terra為EDEN的戰場投入他們前線(巴西和美國)對抗西班牙之餘過剩的火力。阿根廷則是炙手可熱、不可或缺的戰略夥伴 - 因為他們缺少敵手。這就代表著他們是極佳的救火隊，可以時常將火力輸出至任何向他討救兵的國家，但卻時常被官方藉口耍得團團轉(像是和智利的例子，整場衝突都是土耳其精心策畫的外交把戲。)

So we get to Turkey, in the current configuration, Turkey has no other counterpart then Bulgaria to fight with in it's immediate region (Iran is not a match and Greece cannot afford to fight on 2 fronts, hence why they made the peace early on with Turkey leaving Bulgaria alone against them). So the only matching country would be Bulgaria, however as both countries were relatively equal in strength over the past 18 months or so (due in large to the difference in resources which augmented Turkish damage and was detrimental to Bulgarian) it meant that Bulgaria wasn't tipping the scales when fighting Turkey, because it's damage was being neutralized. This was useless to the "core" of EDEN.
讓我們來談談土耳其吧，在現在的國際情勢中，除了保加利亞之外，土耳其現在的領土上沒有任何有威脅性的敵人(伊朗不是對手，而希臘沒辦法打雙戰線，這也是為什麼先前希臘不管保加利亞而跟土耳其達成和平協議的原因)。所以唯一的對手就是保加利亞，然而在過去18個月中兩國是如此的勢均力敵(這都歸功於土耳其足以彌補火力不足的龐大資源優勢，而這對保加利亞而言卻是不利的)，這代表著保加利亞沒辦法打出決定性的優勢，因為火力都被抵銷掉了。這對EDEN的”核心”國家而言是一點幫助也沒有的。

Bulgaria recognized that too, but it also knew it was stronger then Turkey 1 vs 1, all it needed to do was even the playing field by gaining equal resource base to wage war and this would benefit EDEN.
保加利亞也不否認此事，但眾所皆知只要保加利亞發起戰爭獲得和土耳其擁有相同數量的領地及資源之後，在1對1的狀況下保加利亞是比土耳其還要強的，而這也將為EDEN帶來好處。

The rest is self-explanatory, Bulgaria became the flag carrier of the turnaround, by methodically defeating one by one the opponent, weather directly or by sending it's damage is irrelevant. This happened because of 2 reasons:
剩下的就非常明顯了，保加利亞將在有條不紊的打贏一個又一個的敵人之後 – 不論是直接輸出或支援其他落後戰場 – 而成為扭轉局勢的先鋒。我會這麼說是因為以下2個原因：

1. Bulgaria gained needed resources while Turkey lost such, so Bulgarian damage exceeded Turkish and started turning battles around.
1. 保加利亞在從土耳其那獲得土地的同時也削弱了土耳其，再來保加利亞就能輸出比土耳其還多的火力，最後就是扭轉戰局。

2. Bulgaria has always put same amount of effort in fighting for it's allies as it has fighting for itself, so when damage was not used internally it was being given to allies. In addition, Bulgaria has always been one of the most efficient countries in terms of damage distribution and tactical placement. This meant that while it was making headway in it's own affairs, it was at worst helping keep the other fronts at a status quo and with accumulation of advantage soon the tide turned (long before Turkey switched sides for the 3th time in the year).
2. 保加利亞在為自己奮戰的同時也總是預留一些火力給他們的盟友，所以當火力輸出給盟友時就不會用在自己身上。此外，以火力配給及戰略布局而言的保加利亞一直扮演著重要的地位。這意味著只要在保加利亞多花一點精力在自身事務上，保加利亞就沒辦法幫助其他前線維持現狀，進而被扭轉局勢(這狀況在土耳其一年改變三次陣營前維持了很長一段時間)。


I'll just point out that before Turkey changed sides, Poland and Serbia were not only out of USA, but Poland was left with only a few regions in Germany, had lost little Poland in a direct battle with Bulgaria recently, Spain was with 1 resource for nearly 3 weeks, Indonesia had been recently technically not, but in essence deleted and their resource base denied, ABC, traditionally a subservient alliance to ONE was completely occupied and so was UK in the process of loosing it's last regions, Sweden was about to be wiped and Croatia was making strolls through Slovenia.
我要指出在土耳其改變陣營前，波蘭和塞爾維亞不僅僅被趕出美國，波蘭在德國也只剩幾塊領土，並且近來在和保加利亞的正面衝突中失去了小波蘭。西班牙只有1種資源的狀況維持了將近3個星期。雖然以技術面而言還沒，但實際上印尼已被滅亡且失去本土資源。ABC聯盟，傳統上認為是ONE的子集團，則完全的被占領。同時英國也正在輸去他們的最後一塊領土。瑞典近乎滅國，克羅埃西亞則在斯洛維尼亞的領土上四處流竄。

Main reason again, Bulgaria "donates" much larger % of it's damage, daily to it's allies then does Turkey.
再說一次為什麼會這樣，保加利亞”捐獻”了佔自身極大比例的傷害輸出，每天都比土耳其貢獻給其盟友的還要多。

So the neutral and "ingenious" solution for permanent domination of ONE was to bring Turkey to EDEN side. This would mean both Bulgaria and Turkey would be free of opponents and they would donate all their damage to the rest which would ensure total domination.
所以為了解決ONE長久以來統治狀況，”精巧”又不見血的方法就是把土耳其拉攏至EDEN陣營。這代表著保加利亞和土耳其將不再是敵人，而他們將會一起貢獻火力來確保絕對優勢。

This worked perfectly for Turkey as their main doctrine is "win the game = gain all resources, sacrifice on the basis of interest not values", but didn't work well at all for Bulgaria, whose main doctrine is "enjoy the game through challenges, resources are a tool and not an aim, sacrifice on the basis of values and not interest".
這對中心信仰為”贏得這場勝利 = 獲得所有資源，為了利益而付出，值得珍惜的事物並非首要考量”的土耳其而言非常適合，但對保加利亞而言並不合適，因為保加利亞的中心信仰為”享受遊戲帶來的挑戰、資源是工具而不是目標、為了值得珍惜的事物而付出，利益並非首要考量。”

These two doctrines contradict each other and so does the playing style of both countries, the main sticking point in any dealings they have had. This is not the first time Bulgaria has demonstrated that, it refused peace with Macedonia in April, when Macedonia asked for peace to wipe Italy. This would have been a good opportunity to eliminate one opponent on it's borders, however Bulgaria choose to stick by it's ally, it would get deleted eventually later on, when most EDEN countries did anyway, still it is representative of the style of play. Same can be said of the process of peace negotiations with Turkey that lasted nearly 2 months, when one of the main sticking points was not abandoning Ukraine in it's plight.
這兩個中心信仰彼此衝突，所以兩個國家間也是如此，也成為兩國之間一切問題的癥結點。這並不是保加利亞第一次如此，4月時，馬其頓要求因和平而要求消滅義大利，保加利亞拒絕了。這是個消滅保加利亞邊界上敵人的好機會，但保加利亞選擇與盟友站在同一陣線，就算義大利終究會在EDEN決定棄守時而被消滅。

These differences and the accumulated mistrust over the past 1 year augmented by the absolutely "idiotic" way in which EDEN HQ tried to force on a decision it thought rational, led to a quick deterioration of the relations between Bulgaria and Turkey, which had improved to a point of being cold and somewhat neutral.
一年來這些歧見和誤會持續的積累，並在EDEN高層做出自以為理性但卻”愚蠢”的決定之後日漸增加，造成保土之間曾經冷靜、中立的關係急速惡化。

So after gambling and making a huge mistake, augmenting it by retarded actions, EDEN was forced with a choice, to accept responsibility for it's failure and error of judgment or to seek to absolve itself of any responsibility.
在孤注一擲和犯下重大的錯誤以及做出弱智的舉動之後，EDEN被迫做出選擇，承受因犯下的錯誤而遭受的批判，或開脫責任。

It choose the later, however it is not simply an absolution of responsibility and guilt, it is also a fundamental difference in playing doctrines between the main trio and Bulgaria. The doctrines of Croatia, Romania and especially Greece (no surprise they're leading the way) is much closer to the one of Turkey then the one of Bulgaria. Sacrifice has always been a mainstay rhetoric, but because of the "mathematical" dependencies it has been usually the other way around, other countries sacrificing for them 9 months of the year ant they making sacrifices the other 3. Also all 3 countries (exception recently to some extent makes Romania here) are ruled by oligarchies which have not changed in years, with the same few players being the decision makers.
EDEN選擇了後者。但這不僅僅只是單純的逃避責任和過錯，更是三巨頭與保加利亞在中心信仰上的差異。克羅埃西亞、羅馬尼亞特別是希臘的中心信仰比較偏向土耳其而非保加利亞(所以他們會有這樣的領導方式一點也不意外)。為了”帳面上”的附庸國，犧牲奉獻一直是三巨頭譁眾取寵的口號，實際上卻是另外一回事，其他國家為三巨頭奉獻9個月，然後三巨頭回報3個月的犧牲。此外三巨頭(其中羅馬尼亞是最近才如此)近年來都是寡頭政治，做出決策的總是相同的那幾個玩家。

The oligarchic model of course is in stark contrast to Bulgarian model of governance, which though not perfect is a democratic one and is the source of some of it's greatest strengths. For example, while it does cause internal instability from time to time, it has given the opportunity of over 500 players to be involved in one way or another with the governance of the country over the last 2.5 years, Bulgaria rarely has presidents for more then 1 term anymore and has had 5 different parties be top parties within the country within the last 2 years.
保加利亞的政治體系當然是寡頭政治的強力對比，雖然民主體制並不完美，但卻是極大的力量泉源。舉例來說，雖然有時會造成了內部的動亂，但過去2年半以來也給了超過500民玩家參與政治的機會。在保加利亞，很少有總統當選超過一次，而且在過去2年內曾有5個不同政黨居於主導地位。

This model of governance though extends to it's foreign policy as well, where Bulgaria follows a policy of inclusion and not exclusion. It tries to keep civil relations with everyone, friend or foe, it does not use PTO in it's arsenal (the only major power in the game to have never used it) and it has in it's history always secured it's resources from foreign countries via diplomacy and has never been an occupying power (only military power in the game to ever do that). This has of course meant it can dedicate much more resources to it's allies and so you can rarely find an important or big battle during the last 2 years in which Bulgaria would not have been front and center for it's allies.
這個政治體制也貫徹到對外事務上，保加利亞一直秉持著包容不排斥的政策。保加利亞一直試著維持與每個公民 – 不管是敵人或朋友 – 之間的關係，不以PTO作為武器(遊戲中從未使用過的主流侵略行為)，利用外交手段而非武力來抵抗敵國對自家領土的侵略行為也從未成為侵略國(遊戲中只有軍事強國才會一直侵略)。當然，這意味著在過去兩年內保加利亞能為貢獻更多資源給盟友，而在保加利亞的領土上也很少發生重大戰役。否則保加利亞對於盟友而言不會這麼的重要。

These doctrines though are in stark contrast with the doctrines of domination, subjugation, oligarchy (few enlightened know better then the rest) which are predominant among the top countries, where small elites usually came to prominence back when each country was gaining strength have kept control and molded their countries to their own understanding, will and views of events.
其他強權國家信仰著主宰一切、征服、寡頭政治(少數人知道的比其他人都還要多)等中心信仰，並以他們所理解的、個人意志以及對事情的看法來塑造國家，使得菁英們不得不藏起來以躲避政府的監控，但我們的中心信仰與之完全不同。

So we're at the current situation, where Bulgaria could not endure anymore (EDEN made 2 express summits in 2 days following a regular one to overturn the decision to stop Turkey trial and to vote for the removal of Bulgaria from the alliance after it had announced it has left and remove the newly appointed SC, while it took it 10 days to convene a summit last month to hold a vote on Turkish membership as was requested by Bulgaria) a double standard towards it and has decided to end it's internal problems by leaving the alliance. These internal problems of course were externally caused by the decision of EDEN to force Turkey into the alliance (not ot invite and give a chance).
這就是我們處於這種現況的原因。保加利亞再也無法忍受雙重標準(EDEN在定期會議後的2天內召開了2場簡短會議來推翻終止土耳其觀察國身分的決議，並在保加利亞宣布退出EDEN且召回新上任的最高司令官後投票通過開除保加利亞。但在上個月，需要10天的時間才能召開會議並進行保加利亞所提出關於土耳其觀察國身份一案之表決)，並決定離開聯盟來結束這場內部紛爭。這些內部紛爭其實是由EDEN強制讓土耳其加入聯盟的決定(而非邀請並給予機會)所引發的。

So naturally, now that Bulgaria is a top military power, it would seek a different path for itself, one that gives it a chance to not have to make compromises with it's own style of play and it's own doctrine, thus looking to form a new alliance. Simple solution is Bulgaria vs Turkey 1 on 1, they're both balanced and Bulgaria looking to form a new age alliance based on representation and not power output and spreadsheet rationality.
所以很自然的，既然現在的保加利亞是個軍事強權，那麼他可以為自己尋求另外一條光明大道，一條可以讓他不用改變玩遊戲的方式和中心信仰的道路，所以保加利亞決定組成新聯盟。最簡單的解決之道是讓勢均力敵的保加利亞和土耳其1對1作戰；並且保加利亞是以各國的理念來找尋新盟友，而不是以軍力或服從度來當作條件。

This of course is a big threat to EDEN, but not that much to the alliance itself or the ordinary players, but to the oligarchy in charge (same people are in control of the alliance once again mere days after Bulgaria left). It is not only a threat to their position in EDEN but in their own countries as well, as EDEN is their tool for leverage in their own countries. They're the power brokers in the alliance so they're inexpendable.
這對EDEN當然是個大威脅，不過對聯盟本身或是普通玩家並沒有那麼大的威脅性，但寡頭政治國家(當保加利亞離開後馬上重新掌權的那一群人)而言它是。不僅僅在EDEN中對他們的地位產生威脅，在他們自己的國家中也是，因為他們在自己國家中利用EDEN來增加自己的影響力。身為權力代言者的他們是不可能願意被犧牲掉的。

Bulgaria's reputation (though admittedly tarnished through some dumb moves in this whole process by some of it's politicians), remains better then almost all major powers in the game. This will of course make it a natural magnet for countries that want a change in the status quo and more importantly a change in the way they're treated in an alliance (inclusion vs exclusion). Basically most medium and smaller countries are kept within alliances on the threat of being deleted if they do not stay or do as told, rather then on the prospect to belong. For EDEN this means loosing the donor countries to the main 3, whose deficit is not going to change anytime soon.
保加利亞的名聲(雖然不可否認的，因為某些政客愚笨的行為而使它蒙上了污點)依舊比遊戲中多數的強權國家還要好。這自然會吸引其他想要改變現狀的國家，更重要的是，他們能改變現在聯盟對他們的想法(被接受或是被排擠)。基本上，多數的中小型國家是為了不被從地圖上抹滅或是被要求才加入聯盟，而不是為了找到歸屬感才這麼做。對EDEN而言這意味著依然缺乏火力的三巨頭將失去為其效力之國家的向心力。

For example, values of India is higher then values of Croatia on average, because India currently has not opponent, so all of it's damage even if it is only 40-50 million daily is a "plus", where on a daily basis Croatia would always have - 500 million against Serbia. So Bulgaria forming a new alliance and having been part of TEDEN for the past 1 year +, is very likely to be followed by other countries be it small and thus limit the damage donor countries or meat-shield countries for the alliance.
舉個例子，以平均而言印度的價值高過克羅埃西亞，就算印度每天只有4000~5000萬的火力，但因為印度現在沒有敵人，所以比起需要每天對抗塞爾維亞並且還缺乏5億傷害的克羅埃西亞還有價值。因此曾加入TEDEN一年多的保加利亞所成立的新聯盟將會受到其他火力不足的小國家或肉盾國家們的支持。

This is why EDEN needs to make out of Bulgaria an enemy and as quickly as possible to make it harder on anyone who might even contemplate braking the ranks, if that does not work threats will start going around. TERA to some extent is in similar situation, but it resolved partly that problem by expulsing Chile, which made no secret it's stance towards Bulgaria, thus partly eliminating any possible influence within Terra, Russia will now find itself in a tough position and will sooner rather then later be forced to choose by both EDEN and TERA.
這就是為什麼EDEN這麼快的就把保加利亞給排除並視其為敵人，並盡其所能的讓任何國家想要打破目前身分的念頭變得更加困難。如果這不成功，隨之而來的就是威脅。在某種程度上而言TERRA也處於這種狀況，但藉由排除智利而解決了部份的問題。正因為他們消滅了保加利亞在TERRA中可能發揮影響力的機會，所以也揭露了他們敵對保加利亞的立場。俄羅斯現在將會發現他正身處於一個艱困的處境，並遲早會被EDEN和TERRA要求做出選擇。

The second aim of making Bulgaria an enemy is that the new direction of the propaganda that Bulgaria has become pro-ONE can stick easier and TERA can be forced to abandon it's neutral stands toward the issue by having no choice in the matter.
第二個把保加利亞視為敵人的目的是為了新的宣傳方向，把保加利亞塑造為親ONE國家將可使EDEN更容易接近TERRA並迫使TERRA在沒有選擇的狀況之下而放棄中立的立場。

It's yet the last in the series of guns diplomacy by this eternal command of EDEN and will backfire in the long term, likely leading to the end of EDEN as the main 3 get abandoned one by one, by the rest of the countries which have for years compensated their deficit of damage.
這還不是EDEN長期命令中四處對外放箭的最後一件事，但長遠來說他們將自食惡果，EDEN極有可能在三巨頭逐一拋棄為他們賣命之國家的狀況下走向滅亡。

The new approach to game play however will be gaining more and more followers, for the simple reason that with time, more and more countries become big and strong enough, populated enough and enough of their players want to be included in all aspects of the game, not only the "click the mouse button" one, that it is inevitable that a doctrine and style of play based on inclusion becomes predominant.
然而這遊戲的玩法將逐漸走向彼此靠攏的新趨勢，原因很簡單，隨著時間的過去有越來越多國家變得強盛壯大、人口繁盛，也越來越多玩家想要脫離僅僅只是點點滑鼠的現況，轉而更多面向的參與這個遊戲。因此這個趨勢將是無可避免的。

The mechanics of the game force us nowadays to work to limit wars rather then to look to start wars, thus that will weight into the diplomacy as well rather then the threats of the past. Mastodons like EDEN and ONE will eventually brake apart and many smaller conglomerations will appear which will be coming together for limited amounts of time over time to ally as anyone trying to gain dominance, but will revert back to it's forming blocks once the threat has been neutralized. The domination doctrine is dead and the people trying desperately to keep it alive will go down screening and kicking.
這遊戲的機制使得現在的我們只能盡可能的限制戰爭的發生而非尋求戰爭，因此外交手段的重要性將比過去的脅迫手段還要重要。龐大如EDEN和ONE的組織最終將會解體，而更多的小團體將逐漸浮現，且不論何時只要出現任何想要擴大影響力的團體他們就會團結在一同來對抗，但只要危機解除，他們終究會分裂回最初的小團體。不再有主宰一切的中心信仰，而任何想要重現往日教條的人們將被揪出並且被人們拋棄。

The last fight before the old system crumbles will be the one between "spreadsheet damage alliances" and the ones with the guts to move to the new "people based doctrine of alliances". I choose the second, because I believe no status quo should stay too long and because I believe we all should get the chance to play this game to it's fullest, no matter how *beep* it might be.
粉碎舊體系的最後一場戰役將會是”傷害表格同盟(spreadsheet damage alliances)”和”以民為主同盟(people based doctrine of alliances)”之間的戰爭。我會選擇後者，因為我相信不論何種狀況都不應該維持這麼長的時間，我也相信我們應該擁有能夠充分享受這個遊戲的機會，不論這遊戲是多麼的(嗶─)。

Good luck to EDEN oligarchy in their futile attempt to hold on to virtual pixel power and spreadsheet damage castles, I'll do what I can to oppose you at every step.
祝EDEN那些試圖掌握虛擬權力和傷害表格堡壘的那些大頭們好運。我會盡我所能的反對你們的每一步。

Be different, be yourself!
勇於改變，忠於自我！