eChina should join both EDEN and Broliance 中国应同时加入EDEN和Broliance

Day 894, 19:00 • Published in China China • by mariohexu

eChina should join both EDEN and Broliance 中国应同时加入EDEN和Broliance

[Chinese Version on the bottom / 中文见后面]

Since Heilongjiang (or otherwise referred as HLJ, HK or HelloKitty) becomes part of eChina,
the discussion of eChina joining EDEN, or eChina joining Broliance has been activated once again.
However, the uncertainty of the relationship between EDEN and eUSA has made the case more complicated.
eChina can not mediate Poland and USA; neither could I predict the outcome.
Nevertheless, to the best of my knowledge, the decision is still to be made;
and, the decision should be, to join EDEN and Broliance simutaneously.

I shall explain the reason of China to join EDEN and Broliance simutaneously in the following sections.
As former MoD and DMoD of eChina, it is my style to make things straight-forward.
In the article, there is no graph but statistics and detailed analysis.


1, eCHINA needs EDEN and Broliance.

Here is a statistics using the data from
http://www.ereptools.net/battles/all
I listed all critical for eChina battles since eChina secured its congress.
The First three battles are the first attempt to free LK and HK, initiated by USA.
The fourth and fifth are the attempt of Pheonix to swap Serbia to LK.
The sixth is the recent liberation of HK.

BattleID Region Demage_from(*10k):USA Croatia Romania Spain Poland Canada Sweden Finland
8112 Kyushu 201* 75 25 45 35 17 23 15
8310 LK 257* 36 25 57 18 21 19 16
8505&8508 HK 275* 68 54 31 2 25 19 22
9046 LK 1 0 66* 0 2 17* 2 0
9120 Beijing 3 1 51* 60* 4 28* 0 1
10193 HK 18 48 70 45 45 5 18 4
---
* means that people can fight in their own country.

From the statistics, the case is clear.
USA is our good friend. They tried really hard to liberate LK and HK for us.
Croatia, Romania, Spain, Poland, Canada Sweden and Finland also make great contrabution to LK and HK.
It is really a sad time for us that we lost the 9046 battle. That time, EDEN (including USA) focused in North Brazil battle.
However, EDEN countries proved themselves in the 10193 battle.

Now, as we holds HK, it is harder of us to defend our territories.
We have to split our population to live in HK and Beijing.
Russia can attacks HK at any time, and we need MPPs from EDEN.

We needs MPPs from both side to defend HK and Beijing.
We needs USA to attack LK. We needs EDEN to make great effort in the LK battle.
If we are to lose any important region in the future, we also needs USA to attack and EDEN to make effort.

Some people are concerned with the money cost of joing EDEN or USA. To me, it is a minor concern.
Friendship is power. Besides, if we continues to hold HK, we should have some mondy.


2, EDEN and USA needs us.

We are in position to any possible land-swaps with India.
China is a crucial part in the defence of India, and also Karnataka.

On the other hand, China has been active in blocking Hungary, Serbia and Russia.
Naturally, China will be involved in any confliction with Serbia, Russia and Indonesia.

China has also developed a stronger military power.
China has a regular 400k damage everyday durning war time.
The damage from the mobile army has exceeds 100k.
This is not neglectable.

We share common interestes with EDEN and USA.
There has never been a battle where they need countries A to win but we need A's opposite.
The difference is only on how important the battle is.
Therefore, there is no reason we should not cooperate closely with each other.


3, Sol.

We are a member of Sol. This is not a problem preventing us to join EDEN or Broliance.
By charter of Sol, member nations of Sol can join any alliance.
Besides, Sol member nations are working closely with both EDEN and USA.
Refer to India, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippine, SA and Iserlia.
We can maintian our retionship with Sol nations.
Similarly is the relationship with Japan, who has quitted Sol.


4, The relationship between EDEN and USA.

Canada is an example of being both alliances.
Still, it is questionable if we can join both.

At the time being, the relationship between EDEN and USA is great.
They worked together in all fronts against Hun, Ser and Rus.
If they continue to work fine, their is no problem.
What if they does not work well in the future?

As I see it, if they does not work well, it is even more needed that we join both alliance.
Because we have to cooperate closely with both EDEN and USA anyway.
If one side can not accept us joining both side, they won't accept us joining the opposite side anyway.

So what if they (or, one of them) do not want us to join the other side?
My solution is, join neither. Things are easier in this way.

Some may argue that a small alliance works better. Therefore joining both will result in the least efficiency.
Clearly, the efficiency will be worst if we join both.
But battles in this game are simple adding or subtracting calculation.
The one with bigger number wins, not the one with better statics.
The recent article has made it even clearer to me that the 'small alliance' idea is a joke.
Isn't Enterne working with Pheonix, and, Broliance and Sol working with EDEN?
Is Pheonix doing better than PEACE? Is EDEN doing better than Atlantis?
I sincerely wish that Pheonix be splitted into two alliances. But this is not going to be true.


5, how to enter alliances.

We should not make hasty decisions.
Nowadays it seems to be clear that both EDEN and Broliance want us to be in.
First, we should have public discussion. Meanwhile, the congress and cabinet should make a tentative decison.
Hopefully, the cabinet and congree would have the same idea.
Then the president can make some formal diclaration.
After that, the alliance should make a formal invitation.

Then the congress should vote the issue again.
In the last step, some kind of public voting by eChina citizens are necessry.
We do not want to be like UK. The decision should be once forever. Have to be careful.


While the negotiation of joining one alliance ought to be easy,
it is unknown if it is possible to join both.
Thus the whold thing also depends on the result of the governmental negotiation. And it ain't easy.


To sum it, as I think, we have 4 possible choices:
1, remain neutral;
2, join EDEN;
3, join Broliance;
4, join both.
Note that in any of the choices, we will continue to work closely with Sol, Japan, EDEN and USA.
I select 4. If not possible, I select 1.
What do you think?


黑龙江回归了。这是我们加入EDEN或Broliance的一个好时机。
如果说加入了EDEN或Broliance也不能保证盟友的投入的话，不加入就更危险 了。
与当初得到辽宁不同的是，如今的我们，与EDEN、美国有了更深的感情。
此外，Sol国家和日本的倾向性也越来越明显。
再没有任何表示的话，似乎不妥。

比较麻烦的是EDEN和美国的矛盾。
我建议，同时加入EDEN和Broliance。
这是最能保证与双方合作的方法。

就我一贯具体、直接的风格，我下面来阐述我的理由。


一，我们需要EDEN和Broliance

下面是源自
http://www.ereptools.net/battles/all
的一些统计。我列出了我们自自主以来的所有关键战斗。

战斗ID 战场 伤害(万):USA Croatia Romania Spain Poland Canada Sweden Finland
8112 九州 201* 75 25 45 35 17 23 15
8310 辽宁 257* 36 25 57 18 21 19 16
8505&8508 黑龙江 275* 68 54 31 2 25 19 22
9046 辽宁 1 0 66* 0 2 17* 2 0
9120 北京 3 1 51* 60* 4 28* 0 1
10193 黑龙江 18 48 70 45 45 5 18 4
---
*：可以本土参战

美国在前3个战斗中出了很大的力气。克罗地亚配合最多，其他EDEN国家也有参与。
后来俄罗斯进攻辽宁，EDEN（包括美国）在北巴西战斗，使得辽宁失守。这场战斗让大 家对EDEN的信心降低。
但是，在最近的黑龙江之战中，EDEN证明了自己。

我们需要美国出面进攻辽宁。EDEN也要下力气。
北京和黑龙江的防守需要美国+EDEN的MPP。
将来如果黑龙江丢失，也需要美国、EDEN合作出手。
情况是，少了EDEN或者美国，都不行。

关于入EDEN的费用，我觉得是次要问题。我们可以将会费与铁的产量联系起来。有了黑 龙江以后，我们应该有些钱作这个。


二，EDEN也需要我们。
之前，为了EDEN压制匈牙利、塞尔维亚，我们很努力。
美国需要我们协助，保留与印度的换地可能，对高铁的防御很重要。
我们对Sol和日本的影响力，使得我们更加重要。
我们处在与俄罗斯、塞尔维亚、印尼旁边。任何旨在削弱对手的行动，都与我们有关。
我们的部队在成长。移动部队已经有了表现。


三，Sol。

与Sol的关系不会受到大的影响。
本身，Sol就不禁止入其他盟的行为。
最近，Sol许多国家和EDEN、美国越走越近。日本也加入了Broliance。


四，EDEN和美国的关系

加拿大是同时参与两个盟的一个例子。当然啦，他与我们还不完全一样。
目前EDEN和美国关系还好。几个战斗都有配合。以后，还是说不定。
但是，如果EDEN和美国关系变差，也许我们更需要在两个盟当中。否则就不好作啦。

如果说EDEN和美国不愿意我们两边加入的话。那只加入另一方，就更不愿意啦。
如果说，真的不可行，我建议，干脆维持现状好了。否则关系很难处。

至于最近盛传的“小联盟主意”，则完全是扯淡。
读了 这篇文章 以后， 事实更加清楚了：小联盟只是一个忽悠。
erep的战争系统是加减法的游戏。力大的取胜。配合并不那么重要。


五，入盟步骤

1，试探EDEN四大国和美国的态度。
2，公众讨论，议会讨论，内阁讨论。希望议会和内阁观点一致。
3，议会通过初步决议。
4，总统公开入盟意向。
5，联盟发出正式邀请。
6，议会就入盟具体条款投票。
7，某种形式的全名公决。

要慎重。所以慢一些不怕。

另外，实际上，要让EDEN和美国都同意我们同时入两个盟，是有难度的。能不能成另说 。但是，即使能成，也不知道要怎么个过程。


总结：
我认为我们现在有4个选择。反正我们要和双方都继续紧密合作。
1，保持“中立”
2，加入EDEN。
3，加入Broliance。
4，都加入。
我选择4。如果不可行，我选择1。大家怎么看？