Dear Mastah Mason Man

Day 724, 09:48 • Published in Canada Canada • by William Duncan

This article is in response to this: Acacia Mason's Attempt at a Political Attack Article.



Dear Mastah Mason Man:


You could address me as your Royal Highness, and kiss my ass from here to Parliament Hill, and I would still not show respect to a philosophy that I believe, in practice, permits every license, perversion and abuse known to man. Flattery and formality do not purchase my respect; furthermore, I won't agree to disagree for the sake of political expediency or to satisfy some misguided sense of civility: I am not going to pretend that serious and dangerous errors are okay, when my conscious commands they are not.


"In my humble opinion, a CP needs to be above reproach. He/she must act with maturity and grace at all times."

I am not a King.
If you want a stately and graceful leader, one who is so wonderfully tactful, sips tea at high noon and is always so witty and clever (as if that was more important than character) then vote appropriately.


"As a public figurehead and a leader you would expect that comments such as those uttered by Mr. Duncan, would be strictly off limits."

Wow. You are advocating censuring me because I happen to be the President, and then you ad😛

"You may think them, you may feel them, but when your in office, you most certainly do not print them!"

I "may" think them? I "may" feel them?
You're damn right I may, and this article should let you know how I feel about the printing part.


"I have always believed that a Prime Minister ... has a ... duty to respect and lead his or her people regardless of race, colour, creed, religion, orientation or political/fraternal affiliations."

I couldn’t care less what race, religion, creed or boys-only club someone belongs to, and simply because someone happens to be a member of one does not mean they automatically deserve my respect.


"Mr. Duncan clearly feels he knows a great deal about Freemasonry ... He is not a member, he knows little to nothing about it, and yet he clothes himself as though he is somehow knowledgeable on the subject."

Who's clothing whom?
You demand that I behave and act differently than whom and what I am, simply to fit your personal belief of what a President should appear to be. You went so far as to declare what I may think and feel, and then presumed to dictate what I can and cannot print. You demand I act contrary to who and what I am. In essence, you are asking me to wear your clothes, and to think, feel, and act the way you think I ought to.

No.

Whether you like it or not, I am who I am, and I will be who I will be, and if I ever act differently than that, then I would be nothing more than a charlatan, and a fraud.

And that, Mastah Mason Man, is by far the worst example a President could ever provide as a leader of his people, and also as the representative of them.




Take care,
WD