Article Reveals Truth About Recent Peace Victories
Australian Warlord
A few weeks ago eRepublik woke to the news that eItaly & eSpain had both engaged in a fake eGold scandal. Unfortunately eRepublik has a new scandal on it's afternoon news.
Yep it's a new organised cheating ring, just this ones bigger & badder than ever. This time we have Peace eNations eItaly (again) & eIndonesia featuring in the scandal. It features armies fully equipped with Q5 weapons that magically appear from thin air, creating invincible armies that can lay waste to entire regions.
It sounds like a horror movie plot but unfortunately it's just another round of high level organised cheating in the eRepublik world.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-truth-about-peace-victories-793563/1/20
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/why-romania-loses-its-regions-ro-en--793561/1/20
(ps : I'm sure that some will somehow excuse this by claiming bad eRomania but eRomania hasn't participated in the cheating all they'll be doing is confirming that they support organised cheating)
Comments
Boycotted #1.
Boycotted #2.
Boycotted #3
Ah yes people who opposed eAustralia regaining full political & territorial independence claiming that eIndonesia needed the land & control. No surprises there. Of course you're only showing that you endorse cheating, if the right people do it.
I think someones just disappointed their Romananian masters got trashed.
Boycotted #4
It's funny. Those people above thinks it's ok to criticise Atlantis eNations (such as eSpainish people with the eGold cheat) but as soon as a Peace eNation is criticised for what they're doing it's oh no how dare you say that.
What we see from the people above is that they endorse organised cheating if the 'correct' people cheat. You really must ask yourselves how far are they prepared to go with this? Are they possibly cheating themselves? That's because once they support cheating by certain people, they don't have the integrity not to cheat themselves.
Boycotted # 5
@@ Broadside, Derek and Predeitorian:
Did you read the article or did you just see the author and hit the autocomplet "boycotted" button?
I know your all sitting on the other side of the fence to AW but I think you should take a look at some of the links referenced in his article. Its interesting that the holding organisations of the weapons mfg plants are banned - they were using some sort of gold exploit bug (how else do you end up with 1.1K gold, and 10K to 20K in a dozen different local currencies?)
So clearly some cheating wa going on there.
@@AW - the production of the wapons in that MFG plant is correct. In one day you can go from 70 to 109 weapons, in a Q5 plant with only 6 workers. All the workers need over 95 wellness, and they are all between level 7 and 10 skill. Thats alot of skilled workers though - and raiss my suspicions somewhat. Also the 5000 odd raws - thats alot of raws too!
@@ Everyone else.
This is rather more serious than the trivial mudslinging from one side of the fence to the other. History has proven to us time over that peace brokerages that are set some time in the future are often no more than a ploy by one side to limit fighting on one front. Hitlers non-aggression treaty with Russia springs to mind. St Petersburg occupied for almost 900 days. Given were up to day 532 does this mean we have another 370 to go?
Peace,
Eastpac.
(Parsilan)
Put the daggers away guys, that includes you too AW. Lots of mud has been slung around both ways, so lets wash it off and get on with building the country. Welcome back, btw.
Q5 weapons Six workers average 8.6 skill 90% wellness = Daily Production 6.854
@@AW:
Sorry - I think your wrong. According to the WIKI, total production for a weapons MFG plant is:
0.5 x skill x employees x region x trivia x quality x wellness
= 0.5 x 49 x 1.6 x 1 x 1.5 x 0.2 x 2.8
= 32.93 ~ 34 weapons per day.
I think your calculating the production based on the skill of one person (8.6) rather than the combined skill (49) of all the employees.
Peace,
Eastpac.
(Parsilan).
Yes and you get the productivity points. 32. A weapon is made from 5 productivity points so it's 32/5= 6
AW you had usefull information, why would you need to add all the redundant text around it?
Read and voted .
Bil
@ East, the reason for the boycott on this article was due to its biast and usual AW like attitude. If you read his PTO SA article that wasnt boycotted 4 a reason because it was showing good news.
However youll notice it turns off later on but still the fact remains the boycott is on to make AW know his articles need to be sensible. Its worked wonders so far as weve managed to push AW to the edge.
I boycott Australia. Death to Indonesian puppets
lol Aurora Nights is awesome.
Yes of course peace is the bad guy again, we all know your style AW. Last time you accused ONLY peace nations of the goldabuse, while providing 0 evidence.
You might also consider eRomania's previous victories funny, losing isn't that strange fighting China, Hungary, Indonesia, Iran and Russia at the same time. :/
(and regardless: all cheaters need to be banned)
Boycotted # 6
What Zaney said 😃
@ Boycotters I know none of you are that bright but you do realise saying boycott in AW's article is not boycotting right?
good post Jazar. Cheese plz chill m8, not only has the purpose of writing "boycotted" been acknowledged but the fact that you believe we are stupid is questionable.
Chill Br0ad dude, whats with the anger
Oh I know your purpose of writing boycott, to inflame situations, to disregard anyone that disagrees with you, oh wait I forgot that was chill mate, chill, or my personal favourite chillax
Now now Br0ad you naughty boy trying to put words into my mouth, tut tut tut. I didn't say they were stupid, but they obviously can't be too bright now can they when they don't even know what they are saying 😉
The meaning of Boycott (verb) and I quote:
""to refuse to deal with (an organization or country) as a protest against its actions or policy ""
Pretty plain to understand m8, and im sure all that boycotted understood what was happening. We disliked AW's Policies so we decided to boycott.
Most if not all boycotts are done in public and basically increase awareness of the issue so that it applies pressure to the subject in question. It was a success and this post also highlights the reason for posting "boycotted".
I would like to commend you m8 for replying to every bit of my post. Makes a debate worth having. 🙂
'The meaning of Boycott (verb) and I quote:
""to refuse to deal with (an organization or country) as a protest against its actions or policy ""
Pretty plain to understand m8, and im sure all that boycotted understood what was happening. We disliked AW's Policies so we decided to boycott.'
See the key word there is refuse to 'DEAL' with the organisation etc etc, by commenting on his actual article you are becoming part of it, hence you are not boycotting. If you want to boycott you stick to your own articles or don't comment, choose either alternative and I will agree you are boycotting.
'Most if not all boycotts are done in public and basically increase awareness of the issue so that it applies pressure to the subject in question. It was a success and this post also highlights the reason for posting "boycotted".'
True but you still are doing it the wrong way making it not a boycott. If you boycott a company you do not buy its products and point at it and scream and rant or the other thing you guys recently started doing, pointing and going boycott. You tape your mouth in protest or you write articles.
'I would like to commend you m8 for replying to every bit of my post. Makes a debate worth having. 🙂'
It doesn't give them the excuse of but you didn't respond. That and I hate it when my opponents pretend I haven't said something, I try to act courteously and spare them the irritation. SO if I do it point it out 😉
""See the key word there is refuse to 'DEAL' with the organisation etc etc, by commenting on his actual article you are becoming part of it, hence you are not boycotting. If you want to boycott you stick to your own articles or don't comment, choose either alternative and I will agree you are boycotting.""
Not quite. There are many levels of a boycott and variations of it. in the circumstances the Newspaper and its articles were in question so we boycotted where it hurts and those were the comments. AW lives off comments made by people so by giving him barely anything to work off he was reliant on abuse only.
Not commenting or using another article merely enabled him a way to attack those who boycotted. If we dont comment then the public are not aware of his actions. If we create an article he will be the 1 making posts and will use the article to his advantage.
""True but you still are doing it the wrong way""
Theres many ways to boycott, ours was 1 of the better used ones.
"" If you boycott a company you do not buy its products and point at it and scream and rant or the other thing you guys recently started doing, pointing and going boycott.""
Hmm You sorta do actually. Dont really know about the buying products bit but you do make a racket to notify every1 of the boycott. As weve seen, people noticed.
""You tape your mouth in protest or you write articles.""
Neither is a smart move. To tape your mouth no1 would even know your boycotting so theres no point, and writing articles on it would only feed him.
Boycotts are similar to strikes,you basically make alot of noise. Private and silent protests are those that fail. The only ones of the sort that succeed are when its 2 l8. eg, Some dude is boycotting a company because he doesnt like their prices. Hes alone and stays at his house and eventually starves himself to death.
A very bad and unrealistic example I admit.
@Jazar : This time people from the Peace eNations eItaly & eIndonesia are the bad guys. I'm not going to make accusations against Atlantis people just to 'make things even'.
Of course this is a different cheat to the fake eGold cheat that eitaly & eSpain were the centre of several weeks ago.
Yeah, Indonesia and Italy are the bad guys.Spain isn't right?
Romania isn't?Right?
Right.
@ Br0ad, to shorten my reply, I guess we are going to have to agree to disagree on what boycotting is and how effective each method is
Guess we will 😛
@gonzo23 : When eSpainish eCitizens (along with eItalian & others) participated in the fake eGold scandal several weeks ago, did I pretend that they did no wrong? No I didn't. I criticised eSpanish participants in it along with Peace participants.
What we see from Peace supporters however is the clear view that right & wrong is based in which side the players are on. Infact when Peace aligned players cheat, Peace players ignore that & instead says 'evil Atlantis'.
All that this shows is that Peace aligned players tend to have a lower sense of decency on online games.