[TC] Belgium: CoT ally or British puppet? [with NEW INFO!!!]

Day 2,130, 05:00 Published in Belgium Belgium by Tony Clifford
shout:
[TC] Belgium: CoT ally or British puppet? [with NEW INFO!!!]
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2320313/1/20



Ally, friend, or puppet?

I see that now the Belgian military, and the Belgian strongest soldiers, have finally started to fight and put Combat Orders in the war against UK.
But is that good?


INTRODUCTION


Preparing for sowing

As you may read in this article of Kravenn (a British officer, and "friend" of Belgium), the UK ATTACKED BELGIUM TO DESTROY THE BELGIAN DEFENSE SHIEL😨 yes, the defense shield that Belgium had hardly conquered in the August tournament!
The reason is that the shield could have been used against TWO, the allies of UK. Nonethelees, THE SHIELD WAS THE BELGIAN STRONGEST DEFENSE against an airstrike on Belgium: UK unilaterally decided to wipe it.

MYTHS


Use them! They're miraculous for increasing your intelligence!

(to be reviewed in light of new information)A myth circulating is that UK WARNED BELGIUM BEFORE ATTACKING: FALSE, neither me (I was Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium) nor JdlF (the President of Belgium) received messages from UK.(to be reviewed in light of new information)
NEW INFO: NOHJIS AFFIRMS THAT THE BELGIAN VCP, MARYAMQ WAS MADE AWARE BY UK AND TWO SG ABOUT A PROBABLE ATTACK ON BELGIUM: BUT THIS WARNING WAS MADE AFTER THE NE VOTE STARTED...

Another myth, is that POLAND WAS READY TO ATTACK BELGIUM INSTEAD OF UK: FALSE, Poland was in a Natural Enemy war against the USA, which was their undisputed priority, even Miszi (Polish President) affirmed to me (Minister of Foreign Affair) that Poland had not yet any reason to attack Belgium.
(Nohjis affirms TWO SC (but not Poland) informed the Belgian vCP of a probable attack)

BRITISH INVASION AND COT


The polite treatment of the British and their collaborationists towards peaceful people opposing British colonization
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XE9_zB8k_lk#t=2m5s

The British attacked, and after depleting our shield, they easily conquered Belgium.
I know some people may ask (I did!): why CoT didn't defend Belgium?
Well: because NOBODY ASKED COT TO DEFEND BELGIUM! And some people in the CoT HQ actually thought it was a Training War!
BELGIAN GOVERNMENT WAS SEEKING COMPROMISE WITH UK, and so it didn't ask CoT's help to do not make the war to escalate. UK did not reply to Belgian messages.
(Nohjis affirms that the compromise was sought only after NE: which is true, but it doesn't explain why UK didn't reply to Belgium to clarify any misunderstainding)

For strategic reason, COT WOULD HAVE LIKED BELGIUM TO WIN THE BATTLE IN WALLONIA: Bulgaria was trying to attack UK, and a second front open was good for CoT, even if only for drain.
BUT COT RESPECTED THE WILL OF BELGIUM for a compromise with the UK, and so didn't put any priority in that battle, until Belgium requested to do so (but it was too late to win it!)

"Maybe CoT simply didn't care of Belgium" someone may say. Well, during the invasion of the British, when the British government was not replying to Belgian messages, COT COUNTRIES WERE ALSO INVOLVED IN AN ANTI-PTO OPERATION IN BELGIUM, as so requested by the Belgian government.
As you may see here in this article: [CoT] The Best The Brave and The Fierce

BELGIAN "LIBERATION"


"Out of Belgium, Protestant heretics!"

After the UK wiped Belgium, UK FINALLY AGREED TO GIVE BACK THE REGIONS TO BELGIUM, because UK considers itself friend of Belgium.
Well... good! True friends! Someone may say. And BELGIUM STARTED IMMEDIATELY TO FIGHT THERE to make Belgium win!
But... IS THAT REALLY GOOD?

Currently, SEVERAL COT COUNTRIES ARE STRUGGLING TO GET CONGRESS this month: every damage counts.
And... Belgium? BELGIUM IS PUTTING ALL ITS DAMAGE IN BATTLES THAT UK ALREADY AGREED TO LOSE!
That damage could be used for helping CoT countries in real need, instead of lowering the damage needed by UK to fulfill its promises.
UK deleted the Belgian strongest defense (the defense shield) acting on TWO interests, but re-affirming that UK remained friend of Belgium. If UK is so friend, WHY DOESN'T UK PUT ITS OWN DAMAGE TO LIBERATE BELGIUM (THEIR "FRIENDS")?
(Nohjis affirms that he's personally fighting for Belgium, my question is about all UK)

CONCLUSIONS


"Yehhhhhhheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!"

Rightly or wrongly, UK EXPLICITLY PUT ITS TWO ALLIANCE BEFORE THE FRIENDSHIP AND THE NEEDS OF BELGIUM (even more than the Polish would have done!)
In response, BELGIUM BENT TO UK INTERESTS (which are no more than TWO's interests), without considering that UK was willingly destroying Belgian strongest defense, and without considering the impelling needs of the other CoT countries to get Congress.

Currently, to my personal disappointment, BELGIUM ACTS MORE LIKE A PUPPET-COUNTRY OF THE UK, THAN LIKE A DECENTLY INDEPENDENT COUNTRY ALLIED WITH COT.

Quickly in mathematics symbols.


"Friendship above all" interests' situation:

Belgium+ UK > CoT + TWO

"Alliance above all" interests' situation:
TWO + CoT > UK + Belgium

The interests' situation in this war:
TWO > UK > Belgium > CoT

by Tony Clifford
HOW I FEEL IN THIS WAR



Quotes

"i can't stand british insulting cot, when while cot was helping in anti-pto, british were instead wiping our country..."
Tony Clifford to Annexia (Advisor to the CoT Supreme Commander)

On the other hand : Remain wiped should you to solve a bit your PTO problem. If in a couple of months, you need to speak Croat in Belgium. Not our fault.
Kravenn (Speaker of the British Parliament) to Tony Clifford

shout:
[TC] Belgium: CoT ally or British puppet? [with NEW INFO!!!]
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2320313/1/20