The Sky Is Blue
Day 1,001, 01:00
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by George Armstrong Custer
And here's why.
Dateline: Tuesday August 17 (Day 1001)
Location: Canoga Park, The Valley, L.A.
Reporter: George Armstrong "O.G." Custer
I'm anxious to see how folks will troll "the sky is blue" with a pic and proof.
George Armstrong "F-Bomb" Custer
USCongressman, Oklahoma (2x)
Party President, American Military Party
US Cavalryman (Recruit Battalion!)
US National Guardsman, retired
Australian Drop Bear, retired
USArmy Major General, retired
(got a resume longer than your friggin' arm!)
The American Military Party
Dedicated to supporting our US Soldiers' interests in Government
by supporting US Soldiers' campaigns to Congress and the Presidency.
Join the American Military Party, or just contribute to help cover the Party's August campaign advertizing.
:::
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Josh Frost rocks.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/this-cat--1489925/1/20
These are all lies perpetrated by the liberal media.
I had that exact conversation with my 7-year old last month!
Then of course, there is the theory that the sky is blue because god is a Carolina fan ...
False, it is red!!
I say it's more of a teal.
It's cloudy with a chance of meatballs. Duh.
ITT: more attention whoring
This comment is representative of trolling the clear, blue sky.
The comment is my trolling that there's no such thing as the sky because using a noun to describe a lack of space is like using the term "nothing" as a noun when really it's an adjective.
Therefore the claim that the sky is blue is false in that there is nothing to be blue. When you look up you look into the vacuum of space, not at some giant wall that we can describe with color.
😁^ actually, wouldn't we be looking at the atmosphere, which does indeed have mass, resistance, and refraction capabilities? Hense the blue we see? The 'sky" is our atmospere refracting light, ya?
Well, that's true but there's no clear distinction between where 'space' begins and 'the atmosphere' ends, either. But that's a distinction that's always bothered me for anything. This molecule is a part of me, but this molecule next to it is not. I guess it's just human nature to draw distinctions and categorize things as being this or that, which is useful even when it's usually not entirely true.
Dear Custer,
Your point is made eloquently and in less than five words. Bravo Zulu!
~SM~