Join the new world

Bravo

so who are the 11 and counting people who voted yes?

So you went to all this trouble for a guy who's not in Congress, or any part of government? Anyway, agreed. Accusations without proof and based on suspicion are unacceptable.

Yes, Gaius.

He is accusing me and the CPF of attempting to bring down the government.

It is a lie, and I have every right to address it.

People's ignorance never ceases to amaze me. Great Article.

TFD's articles are always a visual feast.

I rather enjoy TFD, though I appreciate where Captain Sam's heart is.

However, what Tantis did violated our constitution.

I ask the CPF leader publically if we will be so kind as to distance himself from Tantis in the upcoming elections, by refusing to sign his nomination papers?

PWNED

Pwned.

And that NAP was complete failure from both Gladdos and Jacobi, geez. Whoever wrote it up needs to attend a basic law class and learn what a contract should do.

Tyler, great explanation bro.

Jacobi,

I stand up for my people - even if I disagree with actions that they take in arenas where I am powerless to intervene.

I did not know that Tantis was going to initiate that vote, nor was there any CPF conspiracy to do so.

These are ALL spurious, insubstantiated allegations.
There has been NO evidence presented in this regard.

I interpret such allegations as an attack upon me, my Party and all that I stand for.

I am the leader of the CPF, not Congress.

I connot control the actions of Congressmen who are in my Party any more than the PPs of the past could control previous Impeachment votes against you initiated by members of their parties.

There were also 10 other Congressmen who voted to impeach you.

Have you made such a public request of the PP of every other party of whom a member thereof has initiated an Impeachment vote against you?

For the record, I think that signing that NAP was detrimental to the war effort and affords the enemy the freedom to concentrate military focus in ways other than defending the spectre of an eCanadian attack upon teh eUk.

It was basically the same as if Churchill had signed a NAP with Hitler on June 22, 1941 so Hitler could focus all of his forces upon Soviet Russia instead of having to keep substantial units behind to defend the English channel and France from the possibility of an Allied invasion.

If there is one lesson that people in rl have learned in their dealings with me - it is this:

Do not make me your adversary.

It is not wise.

your right DAL didnt have anything to do with this. that is precisely why sam wasnt writing propaganda. he did it all on his own. its merely him stating his view i think he is entitled to do that without being attacked

Scorpius,

Exactly my point, thank you.

If it makes a difference to Captain Sammy, I'm an active member of CPF and never heard of this impeachment until his article 😛 We aren't behind it.

While I would've preferred if Tantis had made a more public advancement of his proposal, justifying it in that manner, since I didn't even realise we signed an agreement with the UK, that an impeachment proposal was advanced, and that this was the reason for it, I think Captain Sam's classless smear effort against his political adversary with nary a hint of substantiation deserved nothing but scorn, and not even a moment's real attention, such in politics and public opinion, a most thorough and exhaustive rebuttal and repudiation of Captain Sam's baseless accusations was the order of the day, and I applaud Tyler F Durden's inspired and authoritative rebuke.

Well said indeed, Tyler.

Cheers,
AR1ARX

I wrote an article then deleted. I intended to go along with it around midnight. At 3oClock this morning, I proposed the Impeachment. If it fails always, everyone knows about the NAP, now, it helps PEACE do wht ever we want, we cant do nothing about it. I didn't tell anyone in CPF, on my decision to Impeach Jacobi, I await any disciplinary action leadership wishes to give me. I do what I do for Canada. Jacobi nor WD will fix this. Someone should...

I don't know why we have Congressman if the President cant even confide in it to help make a decision, that involves war. If it fails ill propose it again. If it fails again, now that everyone knows about the NAP and how it helps PEACE and doesn't do anything for us, ill propose it once more and resign, if it doesn't pass then I see how much our current administration and Congress really cares. They ll disagreed against an NAP with congress and only 11 of us are willing to fix it. We cant fix if Jacobi has the power to what he wants.

I posted this in another article ...
Is the NAP a function of the game itself (part of the code) or is it more of a gentleman's agreement? If the latter, how would it be enforced or regulated?

I thought this would be about Uncle Sam. I am saddened. 🙁

Velvet I answered it in the other article, its a gentleman's agreement.

I appreciate your presence here and your response, Tantis, along with your willingness to accept responsibility. Perhaps we can all agree that your intentions were rightful and honourable, but your approach was rushed and lacking in proper protocols? I would hope you could when presenting your subsequent impeachment proposal, that you include a detailed and exhaustive accounting (much like Tyler F Durden's example in this article) of why your proposal should be adopted, and follow all the requisite eCanada Parliamentary procedures.

I can offer no real opinion on Jacobi's actions that instigated this crisis, but I hope the best interests of Canada are uppermost in all our minds as we proceed down this ugly, but perhaps very necessary, endeavour.

Cheers,
AR1ARX

Does it change anything if I say that EDEN wanted this NAP?

Of course it certainly may, Jacobi, perhaps you could clarify?

Cheers,
AR1ARX

Jacobi,

That changes a lot actually.

Are we not sovereign in our Foreign Policy?

for the record, I only voted because I laughed at the chuck Norris joke.

Sounds like you should be speaking to your congress, not post that quite important point on the bottom of some article after the fact.

@Tantis

>I don't know why we have Congressman if the President cant even >confide in it to help make a decision, that involves war. If it >fails ill propose it again. If it fails again, now that everyone >knows about the NAP and how it helps PEACE and doesn't do >anything for us, ill propose it once more and resign, if it >doesn't pass then I see how much our current administration and >Congress really cares. They ll disagreed against an NAP with >congress and only 11 of us are willing to fix it. We cant fix if >Jacobi has the power to what he wants.


Some Congress members of Canada tend to speak more than what they should in public. This occurs in all countries just about. That is why it was done, however, I would hope that Jacobi did atleast give you guys a heads up right before signing it.

Jacobi made a hard decision, however, that one hard decision should not cloud the many decisions he has made in the past. He's done alot of good for Canada as President for you guys, especially in this war. I'm sure he's learned from some mistakes regarding this ( As in, bringing it to Congress before signing it if he didn't do that ), but that shouldn't take away the trust you've given to him before. He's put alot of work in, I doubt he's trying to shaft EDEN or Canada.

No, I don't support to the NAP, but that's Canada's business and not mine. You guys got alot of trust from us in the US. All you can do now is move forward with it, best to not linger in hatred about it.

Look at it this way as well, the eUK cannot declare war and block you like what eIran wanted to do. Once North America is cleaned up, Canada is entirely safe to focus on economic growth.

Elderon Zakath,

Wasn't the chronology of the eCan/eUK NAP strangely coinciding with eFrance's ressurgent attack upon eUSA?

As I said above in a previous comment, it just allowed eUK tanks to move to eRussia. No way eFrance could've begun a new offensive without a eCAN/eUK NAP