Attention: eCanada Courts, AG, Minister of Justice, CP
Tyler F Durden
Just when I thought I had seen it all...
It has been said that "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within."
"At midnight, I made a final decision on the fate of Samuel de Champlain through the proper channels of private arbitration before sending the case to the courts, and through negotiation between the defendant and the team of the Attorney General, the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister, and myself, we came up with a settlement before the case went to the courts."
An excerpt from Teh Honourable Minister of Justice.
Treason cases do not get sorted out behind closed doors when you exonerate them. Instead, you rely on overwhelming evidence of innocence to clear his name.
You inundate the press with his innocence. In this 'case' - which did not exist, a bunch of SdC's friends cleared his name via PMs - NOT IN COURT, without respect to the citizenry he betrayed, then posted this "settlement" as a post on an open thread about SdC on eCan Forums
You see, he is not cleared of any charges - its that it was merely agreed that none would be presented. Zblewski lauds the AG's skill - yet wasn't it the AG that brought me up on terrorism charges on behalf of the State because I said I was gonna write an article and then once it was pointed out to him that he was violating oh, 9 LAWS or so the charges were dropped faster than pot out the car window when cops are trying to pull you over?
Yes it was.
I find it rich that Zblewski takes pride in negotiating a deal which finds SdC innocent when the PEOPLE wanted a trial - we wanted JUSTICE! Heads rolling down whatever named street the court is on. Certainly NOT to have his buddies give him a clean slate by donating a couple of guns to the Gov't.
The fact that half of this country KNOWS what he is and this sham of a judicial body DENIES without due process screams of arrogance of the highest degree.
OBVIOUSLY nobody TRIED to retrieve a shred of evidence.
Clearly, this case must have been prosecuted by Inspector Clouseau
After all - they would have had to solve Teh DaVinci Code riddle and read SdC's own Newspaper - or that of his Org.
They also would have had to sling shot Odyssey around the Moon by putting a square peg in a round hole by noting on what day the Citizenship mod was introduced and that SdC could NEVER have received French citizenship AFTER the Fall of Ontario because nobody did - we were all Canadian because the Citizenship mod was already in effect. He also didn't receive his French Citizenship after the Fall of Quebec either. For one thing, the Citizenship mod wasn't introduced yet - I happen to have a firm recollection of the day the Citizenship Mod was introduced....
For the second part, well you'll just have to wait for that.
If that wasn't enough, then they would of had to track down and kill Jason Bourne by reading the eCan forum threads about SdC where evidence was provided almost 2 months ago, after Ozzel O'Dunn granted him citizenship and he immediately tried to run for Congress.
There was no case yet everyone involved in SdC's exoneration refers to phantom evidence to point out that SdC "he didn't give any weapon." If there was no trial then how is he found innocent?
Of course, donation histories for the time in question have long expired away...
"Oh, he was a French Citizen by accident", says Zblewski, jfstpierre, the AG and Chucky Norris.
Samuel de Champlain applied for Citizenship of France and was approved as a Citizen of France on August 11th. Ontario fell on August 6th, 2009
The man who happily granted SdC Canadian Citizenship himself was approved for Citizenship by France on August 10th. I guess his was "by accident" too.
Tell me, how does one "accidentally" apply for citizenship of a country which he is at war with and not realize it? How do two for that matter?
Tyler's Verdict
Minister of Justice = Guilty, for feeling it was his right to pardon a traitor without due process and respect of eCanadians and failing to discover all the evidence that was posted in the very threads on eCan forums concerning this issue - including the very one he chose to post his decision on, in game on newspapers and citizenship application records...
eCanada Courts = Guilty, for it's mere existence, once again proving without a shadow of a doubt that the whole charade should be demolished. It has NO EFFECT on in game dynamics and is a waste of server space and time.
Attorney General = Guilty of failing to find a fire in a haystack.
CP = Guilty, for sticking his snout as CP into a judicial matter, a branch of Gov't not a part of the Executive's jurisdiction of legal intervention...
I vote non confidence of these so called "courts".
http://somokon.com/erep/hitcounter.png">
Comments
Damn Rights TFD
Grand Frere will be defeated in the courts, on the streets and eventually...on the battlefield!
It looks like the MOJ should resign and that an open trial should take place. the evidence against SdC is clear and this backroom positioning has not only made eCanadians mad but also made them sick!!!
there is no case, move on.
lol SdC saying there is no case is like Gofarman investigating the theft of 35K CAD when he was the main suspect LMAO!!!!
NO! There is a case! KEEP GOING!
ARRRRRRGH!
I cant wait to see how our ministry of justice comments on this article.
Nothing to see here people, move along. Move along now people.
as always, spot on tyler, couldnt agree with ya more
If you are interested in justice hows about you get some by going after people masquerading as patriots and breaking rules D and E of our criminal code.
d) Wrongful accusation, In this case, the accusation must be extremely aggressive, unprovoked, continuous, and not retracted to be deemed a Criminal Offense.
e) Extreme personal attacks (aggressive behavior, threats and insults) against another player. In this case, the accusations and personal attacks must be extremely aggressive, unprovoked, and continuous, to be deemed a Criminal Offence.
He has been declared innocent, anything Caesar, Spencer the rest of the eCan bully boy plastic patriots do after this can be seeing as breaking those rules.
And all that's before I go into what some of the same people have been saying and doing to someone not even under suspicion from our security services.
TFD, the case was before court and no one ever daigned accused him during the period it was there, for almost a month.
Everyone is overhyped about this now, but why didnt they did something back then? Furthermore, that was freakingly 8 months ago! There is about 100 citizen in Canada that fought agaisnt us at some point, why all we hear about is Samuel de Champlain? You guys have been railing agaisnt him for the past 2 month.
He has been blocked from getting into congress for 2 months, and this, without even being accused of anything. NO ONE has ever been prosecuted this much in the past. Not even our dear little homegrown terrorist Augustus Baldwin.
I stand by my team and I think they did their job. Go ahead, troll me. I'm not going to change that decision.
tamas with no trial he can't be declared innocent..that is the whole point.
as for chucky and his MOJ...if they won't do what's right..the next PM will...and that is only days away.
How many people were involved in the decision of this whole flimflam? it seems like 3 people decided the outcome. It seems pretty clear that the majority of eCanadians outside of eQuebec reject Mr. de Champlain for past instances of, shall we say less then Maple Leaf friendly acts, and want no part of him in this country in any part be it private citizen, business owner, or politician.
Now correct me if I am wrong, but is it not the duty of elected officials to do their job for benefit of the great good? i.e.. doing their part to help majority in the country? i.e. the people who vote for them (not counting the whole mobile voter charade).
Members of Congress, Member of Parliament, Ministers, and Mr. Prime Minister, I as a member of this great country humbly request that you listen to the citizens and run a proper and thorough investigation, in the open, using the forums and newspapers.
Do the right thing.
P. Magee, wants justice either way, but justice he can see in action.
Pants>"How many people were involved in the decision of this whole flimflam? it seems like 3 people decided the outcome. It seems pretty clear that the majority of eCanadians outside of eQuebec reject Mr. de Champlain for past instances of, shall we say less then Maple Leaf friendly acts"
Justice isn't a democracy, it's not decided by how many people _wish_ somebody's guilty. So having three people make the descision is completely reasonable but,
SdC>"there is no case, move on."
Just sounds Big Brotheresque. Yes, I agree that the courts have the _right_ to declare him innocent against popular opinion, but I also think they have an _obligation_ to fully explain their descision and do their best to get the public on board. One article by Zeblewski isn't enough to do that.
TFD>"you rely on overwhelming evidence of innocence to clear his name. You inundate the press with his innocence."
Tyler's right. Whatever evidince you used to come to your descion--ALL the evidence you used to come to your descision--should be posted. When people keep btching, post it again. And again. Keep posting EVIDENCE until people finally shut up and leave SdC alone.
Unfortunately, right now they don't have much of a reason to leave him alone as the whole thing looks awfully shady. If your process was just it should stand on its own. If you get it out there and enough people read it enough times then anti-SdC articles will slowly lose support and we can "move on".
Chucky Norris stands for true justice.
Petz, by doing right do you mean by doing what the knee jerk reactionaries with their own agenda want?
How many times are the same people going to pull the same 'traitor' crap before they themselves get sorted out for breaking the law?
It get tiresome AND its the same people everytime, surely the department of Justice need to act against these people including the ones in it own department.
NO CONFIDENCE!
IMPEACHMENT
I call Tyler's article and raise it two impeachments.
I like Chucky as a player, but this has rocked any and all confidence I had in his government.
Tyler:
When you call me "Zblowme" and have nothing to do with the issue at hand, I officially drop my qualms right there and walk off.
Consider yourself ignored. I don't care what you have to say.
See: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/reconsiderations-and-an-apology--1266655/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/reco[..]/1/20 for the rest of the people who didn't flame me or insult my personal convictions IRL.
[removed]
[removed]
SdC (Serpentor de COBRA) knows how to pull the strings. He's Illuminati, after all.
So when he says "move along" you better get your ass in gear:
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/a29f83c913.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/[..]3.jpg
tamas..the right thing would be to do a trial...guilty or innocent...proper procedure not backroom deals is needed
[removed]
Poor Spencer,
Always appearing to shout abuse from behind the more intellectual group.
You are right though spencer (yep, I know it surprised me as well), why threaten anything to someone who hides behind the fact the game will never make him accountable and the eCanadian system is powerless?
The funny thing is that you are screaming about the lack of action from the same non game related entity.
Ether you want to acknowledge the non game related justice system or you don't, you can't have it both ways and just using it when it suits just make you look more of a fool.
That actually goes for all the eCanadian bully sect that appears to finding a common goal to gel them into one nasty little blob.
Just have the trial for f sakes.
He can't have a fair one now, thats the irony, glands A, B and C have seen to that.
And lets be honest, and this isn't an attack on the CC, whilst you are trialing him, trial which ever member of the CC has ever fought against eCanada under the defence of 'the lulz'.
Totally different Tamas, ask Chucky as he has done it himself.
I think he could have a fair trial now. New MoJ/AG and new justices coming. The only unfair thing would be that the old MoJ/AG would probably defend him ( with the help of half of the civil service).
Blaaaaaaa blaaaaaa blaaaaaaaaaaa... J'aime ça chialer car je suis Tyler f. Durden le tout puissant et je décide du sort des eCanadiens à la place des instances en place.
Franchement, tu devrais tellement te la fermer et parler de choses UTILES dans ton journal-à-la-con !
Le cas SdC ne règle rien aux problèmes eCanadiens.
Pathétiquement vôtre:
Actorios
Its not totally different only atoms, you can't say its totally different if certain people are going to look at things in a black and white only sense then everything must be looked at.
treason and being a traitor is a very subjective title, it can also be manipulate for the individual accuser.
If we are going to have sham witch hunt 'Volksgerichtshof' then we might as well do it right.
Gotta side with Durden on this one. Nothing happened 8 months ago because he was an 'enemy'. He had no rights in Canada at that time base on his French citizenship and willingness to set up camp in France. As far as I know, there is no statute of limitations when it comes to treason, but I'm no expert on our criminal code.
Secondly, trying to justify him as one of many is ignorant. Chucky, I like you but by you yourself admitting he fought against Canada, that shows me/us that you believe he is guilty. So why settle for a small slap on the wrist?
It's time we make an example out of someone who does not have Canada's best interests at hand.
"As far as I know, there is no statute of limitations when it comes to treason, but I'm no expert on our criminal code."
The people wanting a trial don't care about the criminal code because they are breaking it themselves.
"It's time we make an example out of someone who does not have Canada's best interests at hand."
Again that is subjective,
I would call people creating their own military unit when eCanada dissapeared as not having eCanada's best interest at heart,
I would call a political party using deliberately divisive tactics as not having eCanada's best interest at heart,
I would call people fighting against eCanada for the lulz as not having eCanada's best interest at heart,
I would call people hounding other citizens as not having eCanada's best interests at heart,
I could also say that being part of EDEN isn't in eCanada's best interest.
So now we all are all going to made an example of, who's going to run eCanada?
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/concerning-citizen-de-champlain-1268446/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/conc[..]/1/20
d) Wrongful accusation, In this case, the accusation must be extremely aggressive, unprovoked, continuous, and not retracted to be deemed a Criminal Offense.
e) Extreme personal attacks (aggressive behavior, threats and insults) against another player. In this case, the accusations and personal attacks must be extremely aggressive, unprovoked, and continuous, to be deemed a Criminal Offence.
To qualify for wrongful accusation it must be proven the accusation is wrong... give it's admitted the trial was a sham, no code broken.
The personal attacks have been directed at SdC who, thus far, certainly has 'provoked' them by, you know, quite possibly being guilty as charged..
Isit just me or does Tyler have a funny-not funny cycle?
Its not been admitted it was a sham.
And both D and E have been broken, its all over here.