[DoE] Library of Informative Links
Department of Citizen Affairs
Hello everyone! DoE here to help you find all you need to find as efficiently as possible. So this is the article OF all articles. Stuffed full with links and basic info to help you find what you need with a single bookmark. We’ll cover a few topics, and this will be added to on a regular basis. YAY!
Miscellaneous Links
♦Official eRepublik Wiki
♦American University Application
♦Department of Education Wiki Page
♦Guide to: Congress [DoE]
♦Guide to: Media Module
♦Guide to: Political Module
♦Guide to: Economic Module
♦Guide to: War Module
♦Guide to: eRepublik Acronyms
♦Guide to: Gold
♦Guide to: Training Centers
♦Guide to: Guerrilla Warfare
♦Guide to: Understanding Bonuses
♦Guide to: Food Factories
♦Guide to: All about Weapons
Social Related Links
♦Guide to: Mibbit IRC [DoE]
♦Download Link for IceChat 9 [IRC Client
♦Guide to: IceChat 9 [IRC Client]
♦Download Link for mIRC
♦guide To: mIRC [Beginner's IRC Client
♦eUnited States Forum
♦eUS Facebook page
Welfare Related
♦Meals on Wheels [D1 only|Levels 1-25]
♦Tank Up 2 Rank Up! [D2 Only|Levels 25-29]
♦Bewbs4Newbs[Everyone]
♦Feed The World
♦A Helping Hand
♦Brains For Zombies
News/Financial Related
♦DoE Newspaper
♦White House Press Release
♦DoI Newspaper
♦DoD Newspaper
♦Congress Newspaper
♦Yesterday's News
eRepublik Tools
♦eRepublik Calculator/Tools
♦eRepublik Profit Tool
Military Units
♦Air Force
♦Cannon Cockers
♦Easy Company
♦Flight Training
♦Rogue Squandron
♦Seal Team 6
♦The Special Forces
♦Ultramarines
♦VMA-214 The Black Sheep
Political Parties
♦American Military Party
♦Federalist Party
♦United States Workers Party
♦Vox Populi
♦We The People
PTO Information
♦Why say no to RGR?
♦The American Freedom Alliance Party
♦Willful Ignorance
Government Links
♦eUnited States Constitution
♦IES Application
Comments
Bookmarked. Please include links to training MUs. :3
In the works - I'd like articles on them as well. 🙂
Not made by an American, but this could be beneficial:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-mechanics-of-military-units-2191488/1/20
That is a nice article Venerable. 🙂 Don't suppose you'll allow me to 'borrow' your work to republish in the eUS with you receiving credit?
If you'd like. 😛
BOO, Don't give him credit, this is Murrica, he retroactively copied you!
Oh stop.
Great Article, Mazzy...!
WOO! Great job, DoE!
Strength and Honour
vote
Good job DoE
Would have been nice if Flight Training was added
It's actually in the plans. I just want the articles first.
Good work!
cross-linked in today's WHPR
friggin awesome
❤ ❤ ❤ ... so much love
Just great, EZC update coming soon.
Yay! Thank y'all 😃
splooooge
A lot of links, anyhow, I think it's quite wrong of the government to add links to just a small fraction of the parties and label them as the popular ones. Other than that, good and helpful links.
I agree...having Vox listed there makes no sense.
😢
The government picked the more populated parties. With the addition of another party that the DoE had done an issue on. Please don't make an issue out of this. There are over 50 parties in the eUS. Would you have all listed and overwhelm the newer players?
I would have none of them listed. Now you quite clearly favor a few parties which is not what the DoE should do. You're supposed to educate our newbies not influence how they move politically which you do by pointing out a few parties.
You know nothing. You want to debate this that's fine, but not here. Do not confuse new players for your own use.
So you think it's the DoEs job to influence the political decisions of newbies? You didn't just link the 4 top parties that the government consider none-PTO parties, you linked Vox as well. Last time I checked they are ranked 12 so quite obviously not one of the most populated parties yet it's there.
You either link all parties or link none and inform them how the political module works, not influence their direction the way you want it to be, this is the work of an extremely bad and biased education department.
IF you had bothered to do research - you would find that the previous SoE did the articles. Not I. I simply linked them. And IF you had bothered to not nitpick you would see that the article is not complete. Now - That said. I am willing to bet that VOX was more than shocked to see their name there considering a few things. They actually are the ones to ask if they think I let my personal opinions or feelings into this.
I am limited on time and have put HOURS into this work. I am doing the best I can. If it is not good for you OR ANYBODY else. Try volunteering instead of being yet another troll lingering about ready to tear someone time for what they do trying to help.
I never said that it was you who wrote them, I simply stated that it's wrong to list a small fraction of the parties on a list of "popular parties".
I am sure that you're doing the best you can, I simply gave you critique, or is that not allowed on here and makes someone a troll? I am quite certain that I do not linger around trying to shred people to pieces, but when I do see something wrong I will quite obviously point it out.
And if you do intend to cover all parties you could simply type their names out and link to the article later, it's just confusing that you first ask if all parties should be linked which would "overwhelm the newbies" and then later jump at me on basis that the article is not completed. So how is it, all of them will be added or not?
I can tell you are doing the best you can. That's all people can ask of you. Embrace your limitations!
It is not complete - It will never be complete. I have MU's that I have not listed. I have parties that I have not listed. Does that mean I will list all? No. It means that the articles need to be written.
Let's point out a few things in here, shall we?
1. You are from a political party that just got born, if you are so upset with the fact the DoE did not list all parties, perhaps you should give DoE the information they need instead of coming here and do vain critique. It seems to me you are upset only because your party isn't listed there rather than the reasons you're pointing out. I actually wonder if you aren't doing this just for your own personal interest.... I wonder if you would make this such a discussion if your party was actually listed there....
2. You want to cooperate with other parties? Start by not taking the fact the DoE did not post your party on the list too personally. You want to see your party on the list, give the DoE the information they need. Plain and simple.
3. You want to overwhelm the new players with 50 parties in an article? Does not seem right to me, new players need to have an example on how the party politics work, would you deny that knowledge to new players because of this? Again, I don't think it's a good policy.
You want your party to be respected? Start be respecting other people as well, specially people who give their best to grab the needed information to the new players.
Best regards and don't take this personally, it's just me opinion.
You're quite wrong, I do not want my party on that list, that's one of the least things I would want. If my party was on that list I would ask to have it removed.
I don't believe that the government should publish a list of political parties, unless it's all of the parties. Such a list would indeed be very confusing due to the nature that everyone can create parties in this game so I would rather see no list but information of how to get a better understanding of the political module and how to get information about parties.
What good came out from this is that now the term "popular" was removed, before it stated that these 5 parties were the popular parties of the eUS.
So no, all I want is for the newbies to not be influenced on an early stage of their gaming experience of where to go politically.
Good job. voted.
Why didn't you put all the political parties?
An entire multitude of reasons. The number one being I wanted to go ahead and the the article out so people could use it. And since the other parties do not have articles - Well there ya go.
Anyone wishing to do some writing?
So Parties with published articles will be added? That's good, I'm looking forward to the extended list 🙂
@Greyfool - I am not saying that all parties will be listed. I am not saying I have time to write 45+ more articles.
Also - I find it amusing that the people complaining are only upset about the party..not the MU's.
The mechanics for MUs and political parties are completely different. In the political module you need numbers to drive your politics through, without enough members you will not get congress, this is not an issue with MUs as you can always do anything you want there.
~hyuu~
V
█▀▀░█░░░█░█▀▀░░█░█░▀█▀
█▀▀░█░░░█░█░▀█░█▀█░░█
▀░░░▀▀▀░▀░▀▀▀░░▀░▀░░▀
▀█▀░█▀█░█▀█░█░█░░█░█░█░░█░█▀▀░
░█░░██▀░█▀█░█░█▀██░█░█▀██░█░▀█
░▀░░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀░▀░░▀░▀░▀░░▀░▀▀▀░
http://tinyurl.com/FlightTrainingApp
I do love me some MazzyCat
https://www.facebook.com/eRepublikUSA
you forgot that WTF?
i kid, I mean WTP. i'll s top.but really, it would be nice to see OUR page built something and which would divesefy eUSA.
The FB page is a link worth adding. 🙂
Why didn't you put all the political parties?
read at your last comment dude??wtf
I don't think you are in the loop.