Join the new world

原文地址:http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/source-of-bulgarian-crisis-1992608/1/20

原文作者😛an Xenonchik
譯者😒oultama

---

I want to tell you something cause Im a man who was strongly probulgarian during a lot of time of this conflict but now changed his position. Tell about reasons that changed my point of view.

我想告訴你一些事，因為我在這次衝突裡的大部份時間都是一個強烈地親Bulgaria的人，可是我現在改變立場。告訴你我改變我立場的原因。

We all could see the kindergarten during few months. Referendums, summits, special summits, blackmails, threats, swaps, votings, votings with canceled results, logs and more, and more. Snowball of insults, distrust and hasty decisions rolled through the winter. But spring has come, hormones has begun to play and over the hills and far away.

這幾個月裡，我們都看到了如幼稚園般的鬧劇[a]。公投、高峰會、特別高峰會、敲詐、威脅、交換（按：換地）、表決、表決並取消結果、記錄，更多更多的。侮辱、不信任和傖促的決定像雪球般滾過這個嚴冬。不過春天已經來臨，春啼[1]已經開始並越過多個山岳。

We cant analyze all this line of mutual mistakes adequately. I can tell more - there is no player who possesses the fullness of the situation. A web of hidden relations between SC, former SC, BG CP, TR CP, EDEN puppetmasters, BG puppetmasters, TR puppetmasters, line of understatements and plume of same things that always supports high politics impedes possibility of strict analysis. And who can estimate weight of such or another word or insult?

我們不能充分地分析這些交互的錯誤。我可以講更多－－沒有玩家得悉這個局面的完貌。千絲萬縷的隱藏關係：SC和前SC，BG和CP，TR和CP，EDEN的操縱者、BG的操縱者、TR的操縱者，輕描淡寫和煙幕，這些支持高層政治[2]的事阻礙嚴格分析的可能性。而且誰能估量侮辱的話語有什麼影響？

Okay, lets leave this demagogy and go to root of problem. EDEN HQ invites Turkey to EDEN and Bulgaria doesnt approve. We need to estimate both decisions.

OK，讓我們跳出這煽動情緒的說話，到達問題的根源。EDEN總部邀請Turkey進入EDEN而Bulgaria不批准。我們要估量這兩個決定。

1. EDEN HQ invites Turkey to EDEN. For our estimation we need to look at the situation in e-World before Turkey invitation. 2011 wasnt a good year for TEDEN. We remember Poland that controlled a half of Western Europe, Serbia that made crusades over the world, Romania that erased by Hungary, Macedonian empire in Greece, Italy and Arabian East. Countries like Italy, Ukraine, Belorus or Israel lived from erasing to erasing. Total domination of ONE in population and damage - this we saw before invitation of Turkey. I think there are many guys, who with me went to egov and calculated the summary damage: EDEN+Terra+proEDEN+proTerra vs ONE+proONE+ABC... and it was obviously that Turkey can change the situation. This was not just damage. Do you really think HQ needed Turkey only for good numbers in Egov? HQ tried to stop ONE domination.

1. EDEN總部邀請Turkey加入EDEN。我們要看看在邀請Turkey前，eWorld的局面。2011對TEDEN來說不是一個好年。我們記得波蘭控制了半個West Europe，Serbia征戰了整個世界，Romania被Hungary消滅，Macedonian掌控了Greece、Italy和Arabian East。像Italy, Ukarine, Belorus或Israel的國家周而復始地被滅國。ONE擁有壓倒性的人口和傷害輸出－－在Turkey加入前我們都能看到。我想有好多人，像我一樣跑去eGov和計算總傷害輸出：EDEN+Terra+proEDEN+ProTerra vs ONE+proONE+ABC……明顯地，Turkey能夠改變形勢。這並不只是傷害輸出。你真的只認為(EDEN)總部只是為了在eGov的數字好看而要Turkey嗎？總部嘗試制止ONE的支配。

2. Bulgaria doesnt approve. That time I read all BG press. I listened their thoughts and arguments. I can select three main: "RL problems", "We need an enemy", "We need resources".
a) RL problems. RL problems couldnt interrupt cooperation with TR and BG when they were in Phoenix. Okay, you told about baby-boom. But you have anti-MCD baby-boom too, you left Phoenix cause Macedonia joining and no RL problems cant stop BG-MCD cooperation now. You can solve your RL problems with MCD and cant with TR? Lol.
b) "We need an enemy". Lets look on the map. BG has two ONE countries near - SRB and MCD. Good enemies, no? Or, you made NAPs with them? And who asked you for it? You periodically negotiate with countries of enemy alliance and who blame that you have no enemy?
c) "We need resources". Yep now there is no need to protect Ukraine or Russia from TR. But with support of EDEN and Turkey BG can swap to any place of world and "mexicanize" it. Or look at Romania. They live without extra resources most of the time and dont cry.

2. Bulgaria不批准。那段時間，我讀完所有BG的新聞。我聽過他們的想法和論點。我可以選出三個重要的：「RL問題」、「我們需要敵人」和「我們需要資源」。
a) RL問題。當TR和BG在Phoenix時，RL問題不能打斷他們的合作。OK，你說有新人潮。不過，你也有anti-MCD的新人潮，因為Macedonia的加入，你離開Phoenix。而現在沒有RL問題能夠阻止BG和MCD的合作。你能夠解決和MCD的RL問題，可是與TR就解決不了？ LOL。
b) 我們需要敵人。我們看看地圖。BG有兩個ONE國家有附近－－SRB和MCD。好敵人，不是嗎？不過，你與他們簽NAP？而且，誰為了NAP而問過你（按：意思是BG主動要求NAP）？你定期與敵對聯盟的國家協議，到底是誰說你們沒有敵人？
c) 我們需要資源。對的，現在沒有需要從TR手中保護Ukraine或是Russia。不過，EDEN和Turkey的支持，BG能夠調到世界任何一個地方和「墨西哥化」它[3]。或者可以看看Romania。他們大部份時間都沒有額外的資源，他們並沒有呻吟過。

Summary. In my eyes Bulgaria didnt give any rational reason of its position. They said "Brotherhood is better than damage", but the real position was "WE DONT CARE THAT ONE DOMINATES AND HALF OF EDEN IS UNDER TOTAL ERASING. WE HAVE MANY REGIONS AND PRETTY DEALS WITH SERBIA AND MACEDONIA SO WE DONT NEED ANY EXTRA DAMAGE FOR TEDEN". I think this has no common with "brotherhood" but a lot with usual egoism.

總括而言。在我眼中Bulgaria並沒有為他們立場提出任何理性的原因。他們說過「友情比傷害輸出重要」，可是實際的立場是「我們不介意ONE支配世界和半個EDEN被消滅。我們要更多的領土，和與Serbia及Macedonia美好的交易，所以我們不需要為TEDEN額外輸出」我想這與「友情」沒有半點關係，卻充斥著利己主義。

I dont want to justify the EDEN HQ. All who spoke with me know that I have not a high opinion of former SC whom I know in inner UA politics. But as I said higher both mistakes after were only particulars. And primary key is the words that I decorate by capslock. EDEN HQ hasnt solved the problem but bulgarians made it.

我不是為EDEN總部護航。與我聊過的人都知道，我得不到一位在UA政界深入工作的前SC的高度評價。不過我說，升高雙方的錯誤後，剩下的便是細節（按：相信是抽絲剝繭的意思）。而關鍵是所有capslock過的字。EDEN總部並沒有解決這問題，可是Bulgaria人做了。

And one more. During eight years I was a captain of teams that played in different intellectual games. And my experience say me: "If player A said 'Or player B will leave the team or me', player A must go away from the team automatically." Teammember who raises the question in this way already made his choice. After last voting in EDEN Bulgaria completely lost my liking.

還有一件事。在這八年裡，我在各個鬥智力的遊戲裡都是團隊的領袖。而我的經驗告訴我，「如果玩家A說『要麼玩家B離開隊伍，要麼我走』，玩家A一定會自動離隊。」。先提出這個問題的隊伍早已下了決定。Bulgaria在EDEN最後一次表決後完全失去了我的支持。

Best regards, Bulgaria. Your former friend.

最親切的問候，Bulgaria。你的前朋友。


[1] hormones：谷歌大神表示，這字跟叫有聲有關。
[2] high politics：軍事或國防；low politics：人權、環境或經濟顧慮
- http://www.flashcardmachine.com/international-politics-exam1.html
[3] mexicanize：擠爆它（誤），請謹慎使用這一單詞。

---

第二次翻译家光源氏计畫連結：http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-1-1991898/1/20