[MC]getting to know PANAM
Day 1,189, 14:24
•
Published in United Kingdom 
•
by
•
by Michael Crookes
Hello eWorld!
You probably haven’t missed my articles but I have so I thought it was about time I dusted off my typewriter and set to work. I have an interview to bring you today, this time with a rather important guest not just in the eUK, but in the eWorld. My guest is Krems Secretary General of the PANAM alliance and we will be talking about…you guessed it, PANAM.
Interview with St Krems
Michael Crookes: ok...so to start off with, can you tell us a little about PANAM, the countries that are in it and what it’s primary aims are?
St Krems: PANAM has 8 member countries, Argentina, Brazil, France, Japan, Russia, Turkey and USA. primary aims are mutual defense and aquisition of resource regions for our members through fair and just means
Michael Crookes: are Canada not a member of PANAM currently?
St Krems: Ah yes, knew I was forgetting someone ty, though technically Canada are not full members according to themselves we still see them as brothers though ofc
One potential PANAM logo
Michael Crookes: What would you say is your main goal for PANAM?
St Krems: we are still in the building stage. My personal goal is to lay the foundations for a strong alliance that will last for a long time.
Michael Crookes: how long do you see it lasting, or do you think NWO and PANAM are simply the next alliances in a cycle?
St Krems: This game is cyclical, I think saying PANAM will last forever is simply arrogant but the bonds that it is forming between nations will… we have always seen the same allies in different alliances, this is the first time a new alliance, with new allies has been formed. and that will effect the game for a very long time indeed
Michael Crookes: and what is the structure of command in PANAM going to look like?
St Krems: currently we have 4 HQ members. We want to keep the HQ small and focus more on our member's presidents. There's a SG, vSG, SC and vSC:
SG focuses on diplomacy and generally runs the alliance
SC focuses on military coordination
Michael Crookes: No Treasurer?
St Krems: No treasurer. we don't have alliance fees so no need
St Krems
Michael Crookes: could you tell us a little about you and what qualified you to lead PANAM
St Krems: I'm a two time president of the USA, like 6 term MoFA, I put a lot of the initial work into forming PANAM when I was USA MoFA over the course of about 3 months… I guess people in PANAM saw how I worked and liked it enough to appoint me SG
Michael Crookes: So what does your alliance offer that remaining neutral or joining NWO does not?
St Krems: Remaining neutral can be dangerous to your health considering the disregard for national soverienty NWO displays and 'joining' NWO is a misnomer. NWO will never let anyone but a military giant fully 'join' it. contrast this where PANAM where all nations who are admitted have an equal voice and vote: we don't believe in 'Puppet states'
Michael Crookes: So what is your view on the united kingdom renting regions to the Serbians?
St Krems: I hope they have a plan for when serbia breaks the agreement and rushes to the US border
Michael Crookes: why do you hope that?
St Krems: because if they don't handle that well it's going to end badly for them
Michael Crookes: do you see that as the likely outcome of the deal?
St Krems: yes. it's the reason serbia is renting regions in the UK and not say...norway, which is closer and would have been easier to get to.
Michael Crookes: As I understand, in an attempt to stop Serbia from reaching the eUK you told France to invade Belgium, is this true?
St Krems: I asked france to, yes…I don't order member nations
Michael Crookes: I also believe that the French army actually fought for Belgium (and against PANAM) in the battle, how are you planning to ensure unity in your alliance in the future?
St Krems: that was a training war. They fought to insure BE won the battle and keep the terms of their agreement
Michael Crookes: so did France refuse to block the Serbia deal then?
St Krems: not at all, they successfully blocked serbia going through BE. They simply found another route but we delayed them by about a week… successful op imo and relations with BE shall be normalised again soon.
That concludes todays article, Hopefully this will be the start of a more regular set of articles from me so that my paper doesn’t become stagnant and boring
😉
Stay safe and play hard,
(Michael Crookes)
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
nice!
Now do an interview with the SG of NWO.... Or whenever they manage to settle their differences and choose one.... Or not
We don't believe in puppet states...
we just agreed to a humiliating peace deal between turkey and greece, against the will of the turkish people, with an illegally elected CP, for the sake of kissing up to Greece.
we just told France that they had to ditch their regions in Europe and then stick themselves in the way of the Serbian war machine
why not join our alliance and provide a convenient buffer state between ourselves and Serbia/Hungary
It took all the smileys out of that, but it was only semi-serious.
voted
lol keers
voted
\o/ /o\
voted
Japan looks a little phallic in that logo
jussayin....
Also:
St Krems: because if they don't handle that well it's going to end badly for them
Serbian Deal = Stupid
Yeah, because taking regions from norway is a much better idea than renting from an ally.
An interesting read. Nice article, MC.
V + S
"we don't believe in 'Puppet states'"
But it sure looks like you believe in buffer states. Some people see the similarities. What the expression now again? Shame shit different name? Ah yeah that's it.
Try to focus more on promoting PanAm next time instead of spreading your crap propaganda about NWO. Makes the interview childish. They can speak for themselves. "My p***s is bigger than yours!" isn't very classy.
Would be nice to see an interview with someone high in command from NWO.
"considering the disregard for national soverienty NWO displays and 'joining' NWO is a misnomer"
Indeed.
American Airlines countries have the utmost respect for national sovereignity. Just ask SouthAfrica, Switzerland, Belgium, Peru, Bolivia, or Mexico, small countries that are their favourite and obviously only preys. But, hey, they're doing them a favour.
Also, TWA countries don't believe in puppet states. They believe in buffer states to build around the approaches to USA ,to boss around, tell waht and when to do things and fight proxy wars.
Voted
V, S
Voted. Good of people to actually go to the people and ask before coming to decisions.[Insert Smiley here]
nice. voted.
Kain Propan: NWO doesn't exist yet, high command are angry Serbs and Poles surviving impeachments by the skin of their teeth.
tbf PANAM are the only alliance which could threten the UK when within their original borders - Norway & Denmark are completely dead, just look at their (lack of) media.
Let's see PANAM's record so far:
- Attempted and FAILED invasion of the Balkans.
- Humiliating peace treaty between Turkey and Greece (attempted buttlick of EDEN at the expense of an "equal member").
- Buffer state in Japan
- Buffer state in France
- Direct threat at UK in above article
PANAM = US = moral bankrupcy
eSerbia is arguably the most militarily powerful state in eRep, yet they negotiate with everyone in good faith.
If there is any threat to the eUK in eRep, it's always been from the eUS. You can run into the arms of your enemy to save yourselves, or you can ally yourselves with those that have never threatened you and would do their utmost to help you in case of an invasion.
Oh, did I mention the eUS' upcoming invasion of ePortugal?
...now I have
"considering the disregard for national sovereignty NWO displays" Yeah because PANAM countries like Brazil have so much regard for national sovereignty.........
@JyM22: I would raise argument, but I don't feel like fighting with a stubborn relative-newbie. No offense.
@Bobady zoo: What do you mean? Are you saying Brazil PTOs countries? If you are, please show me an example. No like really, I have no idea if they have or not, it'd be greatly appreciated.
If you mean a military-takeover perspective, I don't think I'd agree. While Serbia has PTOed New Zealand, Poland -> Belarus etc, no PANAM countries have PTOed any nations as of late.
😁^
That I'm aware of, I could be wrong of course.
voted
PANAM is good for the UK in many ways