[Individual]The selling out of ideals

Day 1,589, 04:58 • Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom • by Grampa Alfagrem

In response to a copy of an article that dropped on my desk from London Congressman ImmortalD.

Having been elected on the backs of hard work by the UKPP and UKPP voters, it seems that former Party President ImmortalD has stuck 2 fingers up to those who delivered his mandate now that he can hang out in 'secretz' channels and wear his fancy medal.

He claims the UKPP never had any intention of delivering change? Seeming to forget the parties strong clamour and pressure to reintroduce the National Army, a change that initial evolved along the formet long suggested by the UKPP.
On a party level, he somehow has missed the saltpeter program, the food drive, the balloting and the party conferences that define the UKPP and its policies.

He accuses the party of screaming 'it's all their fault' when the topic of division comes about even tho' the bogeyman (me) has pointed out time and again that there is fault on both sides as we both react and counteract to every motion made and the items on which the 'haters' base their claims are wildy misunderstood to the point of entering the realms of mythology.

ImmortalD also vents "You're taught that if elected as a congressman, that the agreement to receive forum access goes against th UKPP Policy" and justifies this with "if you were a UKPP member and successfully ran and acheived CP, you'd yourself be in breach of this policy? Yes"

When you are not taught that about congress at all! You were elected as a UKPP representative by UKPP members, the same members who agreed to certain policies the strongest of which (in reference to conflicting with the pledge the other parties enacted) is about citizenship pass usuage.

So if you don't want to snub the people who gave you your medal and 5G then you can't take the pledge and if you did acheive CP and were expected to take a similar pledge to gain 'special access' on the old boards then you would again have to decline (unless your manifesto pointed out your deviation from democratic policy on such an issue).

Neither action restricts you from performing your role in-game.

I'd also like to address the last claim that the UKPP has an upper echelon who demands your worship - There is no upper echelon (if there is then ImmortalD was in it as PP) and blind obediance to some mythical bible is certainly not encouraged as options are always presented and collegial suggestion rather then orders are the norm.

In closing, If you had a problem with how the UKPP policy was set then you could of highlighted this at the last party conference (under your term as PP) or now that you have acheived 'position' you could of asked for another conference to address the specific problem before rushing headlong into the arms of oldfaggery.

Furthur, You could of made your displeasure known before you ran under the banner of a party you seem to have no regard for, run instead for PP and changed the position of the party (something you didn't do as PP) and then run next month for congress with the backing from those that agree with your ideals.


You've been a major voice in UKPP, you were the last PP and regarded enough to be given a guaranteed congress seat.......Yet only now when it impinges on your freedom to RP - You suddenly have an issue?