[FR/EN] Follow-up on VAT and government income
SpockPQ
Je poursuis ici mon analyse des revenus du gouvernement. Bien qu’avant le jour 1793, il ne semblait pas y avoir de lien entre la taxe de vente et les revenus du gouvernement, nous observons récemment une corrélation entre ces deux paramètres. Est-ce que Platon a changé les règles du jeu autour du jour 1793: je crois bien que OUI. Cependant, la récente hausse de la taxe de vente sur les armes de 10% à 15%, soit une hausse relative de 50%, n’a produit qu’une modeste hausse des revenus de 27%, ce qui peut être expliqué par la théorie de Laffer: la vache ne se laissera pas traire si facilement!
Follow-up on VAT and government income
It’s time for an update about my last paper, in which I have made the hypothesis that VAT has no effect on government income.
To analyse the data, I have chosen to plot the cumulative government income free from donations and MPP fees. If you want to analyse the data like me, it’s available here (thanks to Bryan Alexander for its work!). To get the cumulative income, you only have to compute the cumulative sum of column K. In my graphs given below, the slope of the curve corresponds to the daily income. I add linear regressions on some part of the curve to give the value of the daily income for few key moments of the last 100 days. This approach is the best way to filter the day-to-day fluctuations in the government income and give a clear picture of what is happening.
If we zoom a little bit, we obtain :
So, even if my hypothesis seems to be valid before day 1793 (VAT was changed from 3% to 20%, but no significant change in the daily income can been seen), the results obtained after day 1793 show that VAT has a small effect on government income. So, I was partly wrong! Plato seems to have put his hands in game mechanics around this day and now, the economic game is much more interesting (market bots seems to be much less active than before….good thing IMO).
Now, if we look at the results after the last tax increase on day 1838, we can see a slight increase of the government income from 3766 CAD/day to 4796 CAD/day. It’s a 27% increase, but the VAT on weapons has been relatively increased by 50% (10% to 15
😵and the VAT on food has been relatively increased by 150% (10% to 25
😵. I think it’s a good example of the Laffer theory. We could summarize it like this: the cow won’t let you milk it as much as you wish. We also see that the new game mechanics gives much lower daily income than before, so we have to adapt our play to this new reality.
Finally, congressmen, do you think these results are satisfactory?
Comments
Is there a place where we can see the tax revenue taken in each day...I mean not on a cumulative scale but just daily totals.
In the spread sheet of Bryan Alexander (the link is in the text)
thanks ~ hmmm, yeah the overall change is higher, yet I suspect the average intake over a week is not amazingly higher.
Was anyone tracking the effect on the prices of weapons? Q6s have not gone up in price, so far as I can tell, since I was buying some at 7 CAD last week but they are 6.3 this week. But then, I have not been tracking things closely.
It's mostly Q7 weapons that have increased. http://tinyurl.com/amyjhae
I THINK I AM SLOWLY BECOMING A E-COMMUNIST! 😉
Let's not go nuts just yet. Give it a few more days before we call it a "success" of sorts.
I think the biggest factor we need to address is the number of citizens. We are about 200 citizens down from where we were less than 50 days ago. 200 citizens (active ones at that) can be quite an increase in revenue.
Need to keep up a global presence to attract more players, then profit!
Bryan Alexander, it would also be interesting to monitor the CAD/gold rate on your spread sheet.
Nice work again Spock. Thanks to the two of you for putting in the time.
Bryan Alexander does this for every country, nice stuff.
Yeah, I don't think we'll ever get back to 10k+/day average income with weapon prices so low, but at the same time, for the same effect on MU funding, less capital is needed? Since WRM are now 0.06-0.07 vs 0.11-0.12. Problem is MPPs are static at 10k, unless they lower it.
Anyway even 2k/day from recent tax changes would be significant.
nice article
Its deflation. The biggest impact from the revenue decrease is the MPPs.
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/optimizing-our-mpp-stack-2162761/1/20
We really need to optimize our MPP stack for optimal DO, and money savings. we can't just be signing MPPs cause we're in the same alliance.
It's deflation... because Plato changed the parameters of the market bots. 🙂
chriswen : "We really need to optimize our MPP stack for optimal DO, and money savings. we can't just be signing MPPs cause we're in the same alliance. "
+1
Yup, the bot was holding up the hold market which help the monetary market at 2.5 k.
[FR/EN] VAT & Government Income : quick update (day 1844)
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-fr-en-vat-government-income-quick-update-day-1844--2171364/1/20