Ya Boi D Money Admits To The Lies

Day 3,341, 06:30 Published in USA USA by Goddess Dilvany


I would like to take this opportunity to address the stuff SColbert was talking about in his most recent article. I hope to clear up misunderstandings.



This is an image I took a screenshot of during my ban. There is some misunderstanding around the word ban. I think it would be better to use suspension. So while I was suspended I couldn't reply or send messages on the forum. The evidence they used against me to claim I was a liar is that I could be seen logged into the forum. They are right, but I couldn't reply to anything so reading the forum was useless.

Now SColbert showed a series of messages on discord were they claimed I wasn't banned. This whole event occurred when it was a day past when the forum ban message said I would regain my access. Interestingly enough after they called me a liar and dragged my name through the mud on discord, I regained me access. So I don't know if their inquiry led to someone realizing that my write access had been suspended. This action is obviously done by a top level admin for the whole forum, since the suspension was forum wide. But I think it is quite disingenuous for these people to call me a liar presuming they could view the status of my account. I think this ultimately was just people misunderstanding each other.



Next I want to clear up the whole censured by my own request. Senry came out in response to the article saying that I had requested I be censured before as a protest so my statement has validity. The whole contention is around the most recent censure. When I got word that people wanted to censure me. I immediately requested that my good friend Komeko censure me so that we can allow the system to take its course.

The reason I made this an issue was over the language involving me being a trouble maker. I just wanted it to be clear that I was never censured for doing anything bad. I wrote this at the time, because I assumed that the speaker would not find me guilty of doing anything bad. Which technically the speaker declined to make a decision on it. This means I am still censured, but I have yet to see where he is actually punishing me for this.

I assumed that SColbert would use his discretion to reverse my censure, because it had no potential of causing harm. My whole point surrounding the situation is that I am being punished for a symbolic action. It is the equivalence of during a revolution clicking to open the fight on the side of the revolution, but never actually fighting. We obviously don't blacklist people for checking the battle on the side of the revolution. I started a vote to impeach Fingerguns when I knew that there was no way it could pass because the democracy would be over before the vote could finish. I also consulted with Fingerguns Live On Air. If you broke the rules any other time then I would understand that from the forum's perspective that you should censure people. What is the danger of a harmless prank? Nothing!