Why I support Dominik
Jacobi
By Jacobi,
Chairman of Carpenter Industries (CI Grain, CI Foods, CI Homes)
I'm a businessman here, plain and simple. I argue, agitate, and advocate on behalf of the Canadian businessman or woman primarily because I believe that Canada's present condition demands a strong domestic economy. It is my primary interest in the game and the reason I am so absorbed in the fate of eCanada and a leader to whom the economy and its fortunes is a top priority is a leader I can get behind.
I am also a strong, ardent, democrat. Perhaps if I had joined the game 6 months ago, developed contacts during V1 and allowed myself to become a part of the Old Guard I would think differently, but I do not. I am a boomer, the members of my generation are not particularly well enfranchised, and my opinions and beliefs are shaped from that view point. I do not believe in continuing status quo's because "that's the way they have always been" and I do not believe in supporting institutions and leaderships that have become accustomed to tradition because I myself am not a part of that tradition.
I am not a member of the CAF, so I do not possess the near institutional loyalty that I have seen many CAF members on IRC display.
I was against the subversion of democracy in the Congressional elections.
I was against the Duncan reforms of the CAF, which cost me hardworking and active employees.
I have been disappointed in the government's inability to keep its citizens in the loop, the transparency of many government organizations still completely lacking.
I am for Canadian citizens participating in battles....any battles, regardless of what the numbers say, because battles improve our nations experience and wellness. There are ideal situations where we might be able to train in war games with our allies, but if our options are only to attack France or nothing, I say that we must for our nations future attack France.
Our options are very stark and select this election. There are only two choices, or two brands to choose from. There is a honorable man, the current Prime Minister, who has displayed in his campaign that he stands for the status quo: A Canada with little influence and a middling future, proud perhaps, but unimportant.
And then, there is Democratic Action League President Dominik, the choice of many larger political parties than his own. Dominik in the past two elections has shown remarkable intelligence and vision as to where Canada needs to go to grow. Where Canada can obtain more and renewed activity, and how Canadian business can compete in the global market. Dominik provides the solutions that Canada needs to take its place in eRepublik, and his election will be essential for Canada to break the status quo.
I urge people today to make a choice and decision for Canada's future, to embrace change, and to select a leader that can take the Old Guard and Boomers alike to a more prosperous and powerful Canada. That choice is Dominik, and I hope that he can have your vote as he has mine.
Comments
Thank you for the confidence, Jacobi.
Old Guard, Dominik has been around longer then I have and has long since been entrenched in the "old Guard" no matter what he says now.
"There is a honorable man, the current Prime Minister, who has displayed in his campaign that he stands for the status quo: A Canada with little influence and a middling future, proud perhaps, but unimportant."
When did I ever say anything like that? Never, that statement is not supported by fact.
"I was against the subversion of democracy in the Congressional elections. "
That "Subversion" of our democracy may have saved Canada, had we not acted so decisively we may have seen a full on assault instead.
The government won't stop it's citizens from fighting in "any" battles but if Canadian citizens are going to fight against Canada and it's allies they are doing us all harm.
I don't see any reason who you should support Dominik based off this information. I see several reasons why not to if he supports some of these things.
Bruck, despite the name of your coalition, your policies are inherently reactionary. Other than restarting the French war, there has been no change since the Zanalan administration (which was quite reactionary in itself).
I do not deny being part of this "old guard" but does that simple fact not give me MORE credibility when I come out and criticise it? I understand how it works up there- and I don't like it.
During the leadership of Bruck (though I am not placing the full responsibility upon his shoulders) several boomers have expressed dissatisfaction with the political process especially the lack of power congress has- many have even left it. Many older players, even, (myself included) have decided not to seek congressional seats and this very strongly helped cause the Hungarian TO attempt- not enough trustworthy Canadian candidates. Why? Because they all left because of the utter meaninglessness of the most important branch of our government.
Same with boomers- many are dissatisfied with the way things are going. The ones who managed to succeed with the government are the ones who have befriended veteran players. The only way boomers are successful independently, nowadays, is with private projects. This has to change. This game is a political simulator and all players have a right to take part in it.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Dominik the separatist Bloc candidate!
So... how's the weather where you are Jacobi?
Eh. Guelph has been cold and windy all weekend
May I ask how exactly you propose to include boomers more? I can say I am pro-boomer 1000 times and say I want them to be more important in the political process but that doesn't explain any policy that will do so.
Also, Jacobi you do know Dominik wants to create state run RM industries to fill government coffers, as a businessmen why would you support such a policy. (I am 100% against this policy and will work to insure it doesn't happen should Dominik be elected).
Yes, and I recall Bruck promising socialism a month ago, what happened to that? RM companies controlled by the state will not affect Canadian business owners one bit and I have yet to see a reason that they should. All it will mean is more money for the government without crippling our own private markets. I am NOT proposing selling RMs on the Canadian market.
I realized it was a bad idea and didn't follow through, what about you?
Me? What about me? I'm a hard-core socialist in real life but think quite differently in the game. I'm more in the centre leaning slightly towards market economics. For sure, there is not enough government industry, though.
I think we have plenty of government industry, last I checked the state ran 10 companies, 6 in MoI, 1 in NHS, 3 in Shinra.
You would like to add 3? 4? more. And it would hurt Canadian businesses, each company would take 10 much needed employees from the private sector and since we are using private citizens money we have the capacity to push wages up and to get employees will have to.
Canada's capacity to maintain companies efficiently is nearly at its upper limit with 381 companies for a population of 4000, since portion of this 4K is 1-time logins and some of those companies have been shut down we still have some wiggle room for some new companies. I do not think they are neccessary to fund new social services and maintain a CAF budget, which should be smaller than last month.
Though It doesn't quite matter at this point, it would have been a fund debate though 😛