Who is the AGW Supporting?
![South Africa](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/South-Africa.png)
AGW and Co
I know it's too late for our endorsement to be official (we're sorry), but after fierce debate, we in the Associates of General Wellness have decided to support:
Frank Furglar
Good Luck Mate.
-Tacointern
President of the AGW
eSA Director of Mentorship
Comments
Am I still allowed to vote for who I want?
HOORAY!
You bastard! Leaving that huge gap there to build suspense and then...let me down...🙁 I'm crying you know. I hope you're happy.
Of course Matt, it was said on the forums you can vote for who you want. 😃
It's too bad we were too late to do an official endorsement, I was really excited we were going to support Frank. >:
Still crying...
It's okay, Corn, the party isn't obligated to vote for Frank, you never know which of our members is supporting you. 😉
There is no sympathy for you corn, get out.
Why do you hate me Crazy? What have I ever done to you?.................................... .......still crying.
Ohh and voted. Despite the hurtful news...
Here is my Presidential presentation, I'd like undecided AGW members to have a look: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/time-for-progress-my-candidacy-announced-1062006/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/time[..]/1/20
doubtful corn
I pulled a Travis there.
Ah, what joyous news. Nice suspense Taco. 😛
Where's all this belligerence coming from? Champinator, you too? Why?
It's not belligerence Corn. It's anything but. We supported who we felt was best. You can't argue with personal opinion. There was a vote, and Frank won.
"There is no sympathy for you here, get out"
That seems belligerent.
So does, the "doubtful" response from Champinator, at least ostensibly. Did I get any votes in the vote? Just interested.
Dont think I talk for the AGW, If I was I would have said something about it.
Your a useless troll, no different than exilious or ajay.
That or you take the game wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy too seriously.
Corn we discussed this civil and respectfully, we just came to the conclusion that Frank would be a better president, so we're supporting him.
Nothing personal.
Doubtful is not belligerent. We based our voting on platforms and the debate. And what Stryke said.
You should have a different system of voting rather then going to the forums. Alot of members probably didnt get a chance to vote. I couldnt find the article so i didnt. Also, will it be saying the AGW will be supporting him?
We will try to work out our system to make it much more inclusive. We tried to get the word out to check out the forum but time was running out. And no, it won't be saying that the AGW will be supporting him. This is more of an unofficial announcement.
Well, Eric, we've mass PMed the party with links to the forums before. If people in the AGW want to have a say in things like this, then they should register on the forums.
Thankyou all very much for this 🙂 If i get in, i shan't let you down!
FF