Understanding eUS Class Structure
![USA](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/USA.png)
Heero Blaze
So the term “elite” has been thrown around for sometime now, in newspapers and on the eUS Forums, which spawns discussions on class in eRepublik society. But how should we image our class structure and are the classifications valid? Is it bipolar, such that there are only “elites” and “non-elites?” Or is it something more complex, such has having divisions between the politicians, soldiers, and workers (though many citizens play multiple roles)? Well after some thought, this structure may be appropriate.
This is a graphical representation of George Orwell’s society in Nineteen Eighty-Four, a structure with three distinct pieces and of course Big Brother. Now, how does this structure relate to eRepublik society? Well let’s look at each piece.
The Proles:
Off to work!
The Proles in Orwell’s work are the bottom of society and the largest segment of the population. In eRepublik, we refer to them as “2-clickers.” They are definitely here and contribute to society mostly through working in companies and occasionally fighting in wars, but they have a limited voice. They are essential for keep the nation running through taxes, but may not benefit from government programs to the fullest extent. For some, the treatment of the Proles is a travesty, for others it is a necessity.
The Outer Party:
They dress nice.
The Outer Party in Orewell’s work was like the middle-class, full of government bureaucrats and other professionals. For eRepublik, they are our businessmen, Congressmen, military officers and soldiers, militiamen, and newspaper writers. They have more presence in how the nation is run, but to not necessarily make all the key decisions, rather they make sure there are jobs for the Proles, orders are followed, and the government is secure. The members fluctuate, sometimes rising up to the Inner Party or sometimes fading away into the masses of Proles. eLife here can be comfortable, but keeping interested in the work can be the greatest challenge.
The Inner Party:
Big guys with big ideas. Notice how some wear lots of medals.
When some use the term “elite,” they just might be referring to this segment of society (though some in the Outer Party may also be termed “elite” if the user decides to). These are the guys who make the big decisions. They are Presidents (current and/or former), members of the Executive, economic experts, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, among a few others. Reaching this point in society seems to take a lot of dedication, but may also be achieved through knowing the right people or by accomplishing something exceptional. In Orwell’s work, the members of the Inner Party are groomed from a young age, which might be possible in our society as well.
The Inner Party has a great presence throughout the media and elsewhere and their opinions are carefully listened to. Moving out of the Inner Party seems impossible given the exposure and rather than degrading into a lower class, the members seem to become legends or heroes in society when they eventually fade from active life. Of course, the challenge in this part of society is the careful watch of your peers.
Now, if I had to choose a Big Brother, it could only be the Admin/Plato itself.
But unlike Orwell’s Big Brother, the Admin does allow a fair amount of freedom for the people and if all else fails we can speak freely on our own forums. Fortunately, unlike Nineteen Eight-Four, we do have a more mobile society and if you are reading this, you may already be one your way to a higher class of society.
(Of course, any comments and criticism of this model are welcomed, just thought it would be fun to put it out there.)
Comments
Interesting, voted.
Voted, good stuff!
Nice analysis. I'd agree that the "elite" terminology is overly vague and populist.. doesn't really say much about production relationships and so on.
Whereas Orwell's framework works pretty well for analytical purposes.
The question I would add to this is: "Where do truly revolutionary -- as opposed to just populist -- ideas come from?" If we assume Orwell's book has some predictive value, then the 1984 framework leaves the proles and disaffected members of the Outer Party with nowhere to go. (Rebellion is useless; everything is reified according to Big Brother's all-seeing-eye.)
I would suggest that there is also a class of revolutionaries (understood very broadly) who, by forming institutions and programs (not only slogans) that challenge the core paradigms can provide, at least, a path to an alternate node if not a real challenge to the Inner Party's network dominance.
Just a thought.
eRep society = Brave New World
We are all epsilon minus semi-morons! Wooohooo!
v+s
Interesting
@Pheonix Quinn: I believe in Orwell's work, any hope is within the Proles. They are the only class that still retains human qualities, they have their own language (Oldspeak) and customs. So if we apply that to eRepublik, our hope (assuming we need change) would be in the "2-clickers." In terms of a "class of revolutionaries" as you suggest, that would be even more difficult to assess since various revolutions stem from different parts of society.
@Wladimir Rascian: lol, I thought of Brave New World, but we aren't created to perform specific tasks. Though I guess we could use Huxley's terms to describe our society (alphas, betas, and so on).
Work and train, buy food, pay your taxes, and stay the f'n away from highpolitics.
Voted and subscribed!