Treason in Plutocracy
Robert Bayer
The old adage says that "silence is golden". While I, too, like my peace and quiet, silence sometimes is the most deafening, debilitating roar that could fill one's ears. Sometimes the silence makes me run in a screaming panic into the street, to soothe myself with unfiltered cigarettes, RPG's, yoo-hoos, swiss rolls, and women who listen to the Decemberists.
You could hear a pin drop in the aisles of the Senate yesterday evening as a near-unanimous vote was pushed through with little to no debate and even less consideration. Let's all get up to speed, shall we?
Nine months ago, under the administration of President Justinious McWalburgson III, our congress voted after a teeth-gnashing, potty-mouthed debate ending in a vote of 12 to 5, to reduce our international iron trade tariffs from 45% to 1%. This reduction was in response to the eUS's virtually non-existent iron ore deposits, and was an attempt at flirting with international iron tycoons who scoffed at our admittedly all-too-high tariff. Our businesses were suffering, our skilled workers were out of a job, and our state-of-the-art weapons industry was at a virtual stand-still.
But instead, of lowering our tariff to a responsible, reasonable rate, we decided to adopt a "free trade" stance, which admittedly, helped our industry get back on the right track, with plenty of raw materials for proto-types, research and development, and a boom in our weapons manufacturing capability.
Like most "free traders", instead of implementing this as a temporary measure to get the markets back on track and to mitigate market scarcity, decided to keep ourselves cheap and easy, with our proverbial legs spread for every international iron tycoon out there. As our domestic iron miners scrambled to make a living, extracting enough iron ore in the process to keep our prices somewhat stable, there was a beast lurking: The Hungarian iron tycoon. These adept financiers plotted the eUS weapons and iron industry's demise as they saw this fatal flaw of our own congress and calculated how best to exploit it.
And like any shrewd investor, exploit it they did, flooding our markets with cheap Hungarian iron. These same corporations our irresponsible eUS Congress invited into our markets, were only a shade better than inviting PEACE soldiers into our living rooms. Our miners, manufacturers were not only put out of work, but the value of their very products, they worked so hard to invent and build, were rendered worthless in the international market due to "overproduction".
Yesterday, our Senate had the opportunity to acknowledge that these "free trade" policies were, in retrospect, a gaping hole in eUS National Security. These policies did, and continue to put our entire economy at risk. Treason for profit. No one is safe, not our children, who depend on their parents who work in all sectors, private and public, for their food, Tonka trucks and Barbie dolls. Not the workers, who depend on our nation's leaders to enact responsible fiscal plans, so that they may buy homes, eat q2 or better, and invest in our nation. And rendered most unsafe: our patriotic, duty-driven soldiers, pilots, and Marines, who depend on all of us not to profit from policies that essentially undermine them, their efforts overseas and at home, to keep us safe. These Hungarian iron financiers might as well be dressed in olive-drab fatigues, camo-paint, and toting bayonets, with which to run through our wives, and pierce our children as they sleep.
Instead of admitting the mistake, and taking measures to mitigate the effects, our favorite panel of pompous windbags voted to keep these treasonous policies in place, putting our paychecks, our livelihoods, our way of life, and yes, our entire national security at risk. The course of action, proposed by the Chief Windbag himself, and echoed in his party's latest nominee's platform, that:
"We can use the embargo to rule out nations which don't subscribe to this theory and to prevent the dumping cheap goods on our market." ~Harrison Richardson
I pose to you, citizens, that to embargo nations, to go to war with nations, and to choose war instead of responsible financial planning and strategy is a blunder at best, and a large step down the road to fascism at worst. We must come out against the current administration, against his hand-picked successor, and against the eUS Senate for undermining our markets in the name of quick profits.
Our nation's babies wail and starve in the streets, their parents' one-time paychecks going to fund PEACE and their aggression against our European allies. Is this how our eGovernment works for us?
~Daniel Jacob Asher, AAP Democratic Ambassador, Independent news underwriter
Comments
Okay,, you’ve sold me,,, LET’s FIGHT THE HUNGARIANS!
Quit playin’ patty cake,,, LET’S DO THIS
Says he with a whopping twenty-two fights under his belt at level 13? Pshaw.
well true,,, i got a lot of street fightin' in me tho
I don’t think we could beat the Hungarians
Them group of people are strategically motivated!
And I don’t trust our allies to come to our defense
I have mighty respect for the Hungarian style of play,, and one day,, they are gonna prove it
Mr Bayer,
Why dont you get real, or even better stop trying to make up issues by forcing real life things into a game. We need iron for our weapons companies so we can fight Hungary. Actually doing some research before writing such a silly article might help others take you more seriously.
>by forcing real life things into a game.
i think he did that for the drama
he has been doing it in congress and was serious about it until others told him to wake up and smell the eCoffee
i agree w/ u.. i'm not in favor of the use of it either,,
it appears to me,, he aint too happy with the outside world neither,,
thats how accepted it
Augustis, I wrote the article. And you cleary need an understanding of something: That we were flooded with CHEAP IRON BY THE HUNGARIANS. This disrupted our domestic iron prices. But you would need a basic understanding in economics to get it. Consider yourself schooled.
i consider you a little snot nose brat
i didnt address the iron issue one bit you twit
still,, you're a little snot nose brat
Mr Asher I run 5 companies and wrote eBusiness 101. Maybe you need a history lesson. The USA sold Japan tons of scrap metal before WW2 and Japan gave it back at Pearl Harbor. Consider yourself schools
>The USA sold Japan tons of scrap metal before WW2 and Japan gave it back at Pearl Harbor
we returned it
Asher you dont even know what you are talking about
Consider yourself expelled
Do we have doomsday devices in here?
Nah,, no way,, we have HR and Emerick runnin for prez,, so there must not be anything like that in here
>Asher you dont even know what you are talking about
Consider yourself expelled
agree,, he is going off the deep end there
Congress responded to Hungary by cutting off all trade. I don't know what more you want.
Agent: The point is: we want their iron, we just want them to pay a decent tax to sell it to us. Before we let them send it here for free, only to make profit, and that's what ruined our weapons manufacturing and other sectors that depend on raw iron. What I want is to point out how "free trade" is harmful to the eUSA.
how exactly is cheap iron hurting the manufacturing companies?
I'm not in the free trade camp. I think we should protect the shiznitch out of our businesses because the programmers designed the game to reward countries for being protectionist and paranoid. But the fact is, since we are no longer doing business with Hungary now all this sturm und drang seems a little hot and bothery to me. *shrug*
Insightful Mr Archer. Your a bold young man with a nose for scullduggery, political intrigue and quest for the deep connectivity of the matter. A budding Philip Noel Pettit.
Augustis, you obviously didn't read the whole article or you'd have realized that I didn't write the article, I only posted it.
Augustis: It hurts us because when we are flooded with cheap iron, such as the Hungarians did, it plummets the prices OUR miners and manufacturers can get for OUR products, and ultimately, put many US weapons manufacturers and mining companies in NJ out of business. If we just had set a responsible trade tariff in the first place, we could benefit from anyone;s iron, Hungary's included, while still being able to reap hefty profits for our businesses, and be able to sell our products here, and abroad. But flooded with cheap iron, this is impossible to do.
Argent: We should save acts of war for warfare, not economic manipulation. It also makes one wonder where the next flood of cheap, poorly made foreign goods will come from next.
The alternative is isolation,, is that what you are promoting?
Additionally,, I don’t agree with your premise,, Bayer is laying a lot of the blame for this debacle on congress and the president for mismanaging the dang thing
They are the ones that have deteriorated this to an embargo
Our leadership opened the door to the eUSA for ‘em,, as it were.
He is saying better management shoulda been instilled from the git go
I don’t believe he was advocating “isolationism”,, but then again,, maybe he was,, i dunno,, that "our kids" bit threw me for a loop,,, i havent even laid anybody in here yet
over stock on iron does hurt the iron producers but does not hurt the manufacturing companies. In fact it helps them with cheaper raw material prices.
Okay: Please, read it again.
First off, Bayer didn't write it. I did.
Second of all: the "alternative" is not isolation. It's setting responsible trade tariffs so our economy cannot be manipulated from abroad. If it's not Hungary next time, who will it be?
Set responsible trade tariffs NOW, Congress.
Bayer since you posted it you obviously agree with the uneducated theories held within
Asher have you even looked at the last 7 days of proposals? How many import taxes are set at 1%?
Augustis: Very good, Threadhopper. . . . . . You are correct in saying that some tariffs have been re-set to responsible rates. My case is made that the iron industry was an exception, and it proved to be a hole in our economic security. It had a devastating impact on our domestic iron trade. This is not theory. This is what has happened.
I agree with some of what he said, but just because I posted it doesn't mean I agree with all of his theories. The fact that you think that, alone, demonstrates your ignorance. Aristotle once said, "the mark of an educated mind is that it can entertain an idea without accepting it". Apparently, this is not true for certain people here, however.
Bayer even heard of a disclaimer?
Well, Congressman Bayer, it is true, because you voted for the embargo. So it's obvious that you don't completely agree. I applaud you for printing a differing point of view, however. I'm only posing a different view that says if our Government had protected our domestic work-force initially, like any "Worker's Party" should have, we wouldn't have to cover our arses by setting sanctions and embargoes.
Well Congressman Augustis also voted for the embargo and the raise of the imports that have been changed.
Then I applaud you Augustis, for responsible fiscal policy and management. But we ought to either garner free trade agreements first, and decide what nations our businesses will and won't trade with, before we take our pants down like that again.
If we're playing a global game of "if I show you mine, will you show me yours", then darn it, the USA needs to see theirs first!
Mr. Asher, I'm not sure how the vote in favor of the embargo is inconsistent with anti-"free" trade economics. Could you please expound that for you?
Just that the embargo was a band-aid on a wound that our own government caused us by lowering the tariffs in "free"-trade fashion in the first place. So to go to put in place an embargo in lieu of raising the tariffs to a responsible rate, is in my opinion, at the very least, playing into the "free" trade camp's hands.
The thing is cheap iron is good for both weapon manufacturers and for consumers. Cheaper inputs lead to higher profits and cheaper goods.
Also, as far as iron workers are concerned, any land worker working in iron in the USA is being cheated out of a fair wage because their productivity is lower. 2 units of oil or wood are worth more than 1 unit of iron.
To sum up, iron tariffs hurt every single person in America.
Any restriction of trading also hurts everyone. So the embargo is less of a bandaid, and more of salt in the wound. (because we already have embargoes against so many iron producers)
I'm getting more and more disturbed by the trend of eAmerican University professors and staff leveraging their educational roles for political advantage.
Nice!