The Pursuit of Happiness
![United Kingdom](http://www.erepublik.net/images/flags_png/S/United-Kingdom.png)
Johnobrow
Over the past two years or so, the vast majority of players have chosen to pursue the rewards of conformity instead of the fruits of revolt. What they have been left with are ugly and stupid elives, ugly and stupid countries and a game pushed to the very edge of destruction by the admins' efforts to keep feeding them new promises of consumable happiness.
But the thought that one is wasting one's elife is not a cheerful one, and respectable citizens everywhere have gone to considerable lengths to avoid it. They have erected elaborate architectures of lies and self-deceptions in an attempt to persuade themselves and others that their work is not petty nonsense directed by contemptible admins and elites to idiotic and dull ends, that their political parties are not desolate bunkers of mutual contempt and shared incarceration, that their leisure and friendships are not collections of inconsequential games and insubstantial interests, that their wars are not banal tramps through despoilation, that the ways in which they think they avoid the common vulgarity are not entirely spurious, that their pleasures are not dreadfully small.
They cling to these illusions with ferocious desperation; but the whole house of lying ghosts and grim parodies is a fragile one, and it is threatened by the depredations of delinquency. To the extent that delinquency prevents respectable citizens from misperceiving themselves as happy and free players who are blessed with rich experiences and who continue to grow as individuals, it provokes their fury. It threatens to take away the very little they have, and to replace it with nothing. It threatens to bring them face to face with the poverty of eRepublik that has been there in one form or another all along.
Rebellion and non-conformism are always intolerable. They threaten to expose the lie, to tear down the facade, to disillusion. When illusion is all you know, it is your everything - no matter how unfulfilling and dissatisfying it inevitably is. All opposition must be hounded, banned and blacklisted.
This quest for contentment has spawned a series of 'rebeligions' including Dioists and Bobloists and more loosely, all the world's trolls. Each of these has put forward its own particular array of culture, language, imagery and cool behaviours as an authentic and ecstatic alternative to the misery of the orthodoxy and the ways of elife that honest and conforming people pursue. But none of these have marked the slightest departure from the global domination of bourgeois-nationalism and its logic. They have served only to assimilate players into yet more external models of thought and action, into yet more waves of commodity production and consumption. The delinquents of today remain stuck in this pseudo-rebellious process. Consider, my friends, their behaviour; the ways in which they talk and present themselves; and they're view of what makes up the good elife. Do these not reveal the extent to which they are seeking to gain status and pleasure by acting out a small variation on the templates the dominant society has shown them?
Consider, too, their unbroken, nervous concern for the visible approval of their friends. Does this not show how the individual is subordinated to a domineering collective? For all their difference, the delinquents essentially elive much as others do. Assimilating oneself into an external image of a good elife - and submitting to a collectivity - is a perfectly ordinary form of alienated "existence" in the "existing" society. The delinquents are mistaken to associate this state of affairs with autonomy, excitement, shrewdness and freedom - both by themselves and others. They may purchase some fragile self-esteem, kicks and acceptance. They may even secure some precarious means of esurvival. But they pay for them with the usual currency of submission and self-alienation.
Comments
Death to decadence!
You can add the Kumnaa cult to that and all.
Yep.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlNpks9WtnY&feature=fvsr
but death to decadence?
Ah come on now, thats a little unreasonable, isn't it?
*sits back with strawberries dipped in warm nutella ...mmmm.mmmmm...mmm...*
reported
dontbotherreading.jpg
The world is like a ride in an amusement park, and when you choose to go on it you think it's real because that's how powerful our minds are. The ride goes up and down, around and around, it has thrills and chills, and it's very brightly coloured, and it's very loud, and it's fun for a while. Many people have been on the ride a long time, and they begin to wonder, "Hey, is this real, or is this just a ride?" And other people have remembered, and they come back to us and say, "Hey, don't worry; don't be afraid, ever, because this is just a ride." And we...kill those people. "Shut him up! I've got a lot invested in this ride, shut him up! Look at my furrows of worry, look at my big bank account, and my family. This has to be real."
I posted a video of that Bill Hicks spiel on facebook day before yesterday...
Phil Jupitus quoted it when he recently spoke/received his honorary degree.
DIO DIO DIO DIO DIO etc
Wow you do take this all very seriously..
I am impressed you can get higher level thinking from a really basic one dimensional online game with the (former) simple strategy elements removed. I guess you have to be very deep in imaginary socio-policical constructs to see it this way. I suppose people want to find 'The Meaning of e-Life'. I wouldn't have thought however that this poorly run gaming product offered much of an example, compared to the rich variety of immersive 3 D virtual worlds with their 'real world currency exchanges' and myriad avatar-personified 'e-lifestyle' choices.
Well written piece indeed but...I find it hard to worry about such ethereal constructs here in 'Few Click' Land.
But then I suppose given the way the actual game play has been reduced back to almost nothing, there is little else to do here... hence I suppose why we have so many 'politicians' and fervent 'nationalism' over 'e-countries'.
tldr; on this?
tldr? But this is one of my shorter articles...
I didn't understand a word of this. can someone translate for me?
"you find philosophy when the rules of the world cease to make sense, the same goes for the eWorld"
-Vincent Nolan whilst eating a taco