The Poles either they are playing the Game or they are in trouble
Barflys
Today I would like to commend to the recent crisis that was created within EDEN, with the situation in ePeru. I have read the articles, seen the explanations, and heard the arguments. But still there is something missing.
My understanding is that some Polish private armies took-over ePeru and the Peruvians invited the Argentineans to invade them in order to liberate them. And then the mess began.
The official Polish government assumed a stance of neutrality, Spain supported Argentina, Croatia fought for ePeru and others like Greece fought on both sides !!
So many concluded the EDEN is in crisis.
It is the opinion of this publication that the Poles are playing the game which is good, but more seriously are playing with the future of the alliance, or….
Lets assume that the private Polish armies cannot be controlled by the Polish government and that they are doing whatever they want, they are rogue. In this scenario I would expect that the Polish government would condemned the take-over and the alliance as a whole would demand the departure of the Polish groups from ePeru, or else. But the Polish government did not condemn the attacks and therefore one can assume that they could be secretly supporting the action, although publicly proclaimed neutrality. With this way they divide EDEN loyalties (so the alliance is ineffective and confused) and could take the high iron of ePeru, having at the same time a launching pad for future military actions in the Latin America.
There is of course also the scenario that the Polish government cannot control the different private armies and moreover is afraid of them. Then in this case we are talking about a puppet government, prisoner of their private armies’ agendas. The neutrality they kept was out of fear generated by domestic issues.
So following this logic the Polish Government is either complacent and co-conspirator to this affair, or completely irrelevant and weak unable to lead its own citizens and protect the interests of the alliance.
This issue becomes of particular importance since the Polish delegate will assume an important role in the EDEN HQ.
The main questions that arise are two:
1) Can we (as alliance) rely on Poland? Or they are using EDEN in order to promote their agenda?
2) Can we allow this to happen again ? Or the alliance should have an official stance regarding such issues, in general.
And do not be mistaken about all of the above that there is a proclamation of any sort of “morality”. We play a war game and if we want to be aggressive (now that ex-Peace is in some difficulty, debatable) is absolutely fine….. BUT… we need to do this all together and agree upon it. EDEN (and this is something our leaders should consider seriously) can not be prisoner or spectator to the policies and actions of a single group or country. And if the rules of the alliance are breached then there should be some consequences !!!
Last but not least, I find unacceptable the comments made by some Poles like “Only the Croats are our friends” or “and Jaguaros and his outfit” or “EDEN did not support us”. Not only you brought this situation onto yourselves, assuming unilateral action even against the wishes from your own government (at least this is the official explanation), but you created a big problem and insecurity in the EDEN brotherhood. All of EDEN (and eGreece especially), we are ready to fight until the bitter end for any of our allies, just we expect to be part of the plan and not to be forced into a complex situation against our wishes. And for those that claim that Argentina are the real aggressors that want ePeru’s Iron I say : Let them be, let them take Peru, and they will find us there fighting for its liberation.
Comments
The question is - Can we rely on you? Who is more important to Eden, Peace countries or Poles? Ask yourself and think why Spain fight for peace country and Greece is fighting on both sides.
Poles are Poles, and Peace is Peace. And you can't change that.
Love to Croatia.
Vinniczek I dont think you read the article. The Polish government was 'neutral'. EDEN as far as i know is an alliance of states/countries, not groups or individuals. Poles created this mess, and therefore you cannot complain about the actions of all the others when you go and do your own thing....
Our government already broke up because of this. And something about 80% of Poles are supporting Peru so i don't think you get the point.
Government is representing the majority of Poles, and in this case they represents they own business. What is more, people in Peru ARE Poles. Poles. Eden. You get this? Because of EDEN move, PEACE gain another high region, and we simply don't understand that.
Government of Poland 😕= voice of majority of Poles
who cares about peru, as if there aren't enough high iron regions to go around
stop bickering about petty BS because you can't find any real issues to talk about
The point which seems you dont get is that you cannot start a war on your own (right or wrong, majority or minority, debatable), and then expect all the alliance to follow without objections, because as you claim "Because of EDEN move, PEACE gain another high region", is for our own good.
The right course of action is for.. discuss it.. take approval and we will all support you. For unilateral actions you cannot demand unquestioned obedience....
@atom
It is your right to believe what is BS or not. This discussion (not bickering) is about EDEN and the way the allies behave or better should behave, not about Peru.
Hey. We din't want you to follow us.
Just don't fight against us along with PEACE.
Precisely my friend, i am glad for your answer.
So alliance for you is "dont bother/oppose us when we do our own thing" whatever it is.
Silly me that i thought that alliance is collective action and cooperation.
No.
Croatia is an Allie to us. Spain is not. Now.