The New Era of eUS Politics
wingfield
Change has been coming for a long time. Those who have resisted change were dragged kicking and screaming all the way to the wire. Then the inevitable happened. The existing regime collapsed.
We no longer have a government.
In theory, we have a President and a Congress, along with the handful of regions still holding out against the invaders. In practise, there is nothing.
For too long, a select group of individuals, who call themselves meta-gamers, for want of a better description, have held eUS politics in total lockdown. All important decisions were made outside of eRepublik (hence “meta-game”) and heavy handed measures were used to keep people in line in-game.
This enduring PTO (for 'political take over' it indeed is) dressed itself up in respectability and sustained its position by the co-opting of a well-known bogeyman, who leads a minority faction within the country. The regime (the internal PTO) relied upon the threat of the externally supported PTO aspirant to justify its stranglehold.
We have a top five party structure that consists of one “outsider” party and four “zombie” parties, utterly indistinguishable from each other and utterly incapable of reform.
When anyone ever challenges this “Unity” regime, the mantra has been: “If we change anything, RGR will win and Serbia will take over the country”.
What a tired, old and empty threat!
Firstly, Serbia doesn’t need Ajay Bruno to take us over. They are doing a fair enough job of it on the battlefield.
Secondly, the Unity regime has usurped all power and authority to itself. No one but the chosen few have ANY say in how things tick. The regime oppresses an unsavory minority by making it the bogeyman which they then use to oppress the majority, depriving us of any democratic rights.
Unity and the AFA are two sides of the same coin. Neither side wants to allow ordinary voters a say. Perhaps it is more accurate to say that Unity and the AFA are the same crooked side of a stolen coin, that coin being our democratic rights.
The next ten days will see the usual shenanigans to impose a “Unity” candidate upon us and the attempt to freeze out any other non-AFA candidates, to ensure that the “Unity” candidate wins and we are back where we started – EVERY month.
My next article will attempt to identify the rights and wrongs. Then we can examine what is to be done to bring about change.
Comments
1. The system is broken. We need to fix it.
2. The government has forfeited the respect and loyalty of the people.
Strength and Honor....
Voted
Voted.
Word!
v+s
Vote and Subscribed
V+S+Shout
I call BS. My Unity proposal puts the power back in the hands of the players.
We'll see what the T4 PP's decide to do. Because, yes, the choice mechanically, and ultimately lies with them.
your two statements kind of counteract each other there. your proposal put power back in the hands of the people but you have to see what the top 4 PP decide to do. so are the people running your parties or are the top 4 PP running your parties?
Well...we elect party presidents to run the parties....that's the point...
Exactly what Ludonarr said. PP's are elected by the majority of their party, quite often in landslides, which means that PP represents the majority will of the party.
And if the PP violates that, they won't win next month.
The party presidents only win by "landslides" because people are not actually allowed a choice of candidate in-game: one of the many evils of unrepresentative primaries.
He has a solid point here. PP's are chosen meta too, effectually. Give legitimacy to anyone who wants to run in game instead of picking in meta. You could still "vet" for PTO'ers with some recognized necessity. But run in game for PP, with blind votes.
The problem with meta voting is peer influence, second only to the off site (minority) participation.
True in Unity elections, true in your current meta PP primaries.
What's stopping people from voting in the meta? What's stopping PP's, or even a member of a party, from going "Hey, they're doing their meta thing, I should write an article and record people's votes on it, or run a voting campaign via PM for a primary"?
There isn't anything. Your complaints become valid when these things are done and those non-meta voices are ignored.
Until then, people are choosing to go along with what they're given. True "rebellion" has many options.
'What's stopping people from voting in the meta? '
The hatred, bigotry and personal attacks any dissent on the 'eUS Forums' draws; virtual every party has a sub board on that forum and even in so called 'private' party boards the trolls are out in force -first thing that needs to happen is move Congress back in game....
I wouldn't venture a guess, mostly because it doesn't matter (why peeps won't vote meta in large numbers). You don't take voters to polls, you take polls to voters. Getting out of game for a minute, but The United States Supreme Court ruled this way in the 1970's and it still stands as the Equal Access rule. The reasoning was that polling locations out of one's own comfort zone (neighborhoods) was ripe for intimidation and, even, corruption.
Frankly, I think their reasoning is just as valid in here wrt meta (eUS Forum voting location.
Additionally, there is a sound REASON why voting is blind versus open. And again, that reason is undue peer (or otherwise) influence.
I'm not involved atm Talo, so I haven't been part of the wider restructuring debate. I'm sure you guys came up with the best system u could under the circumstances and limits of internet. And I VERY MUCH appreciate the work YOU PERSONALLY have put into this effort.
But I won't find this the best we can do without blind votes and in game votes really. Both have proved to be the most participatory and valid results.
RGR4CP ?
You are not the answer
Oh well, I'll keep running until I win 😉
"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results." - Rita Mae Brown
who tf is rita mae brown. 😛
that was an Einstein quote.
NO...STFU...GTFO...go home Serbian...!
No, but thanks for asking.
stupid is as stupid does
I'd rather have elitists than RGR. I'll do anything to keep him out.
Voted hard, and subscribed. I too have some ideas on how we can affect change, so I look forward to your next article.
Chopp next "Unity" candidate? That could be a solution, US will be united for real!
United under the Serbian flag.
Good article. But there's not enough bot power to change anything. : )
Word!
I look forward to any suggestions for solving the problem
I wrote one: Unplugged
Not many people like change. It wasn't too popular.
voted, be right!
Always enjoy your stuff Wingfield. Proud to have you on our team, always thinking, always questioning. Always keeping people improving and looking for better ways.
Thank God I live in a country that recognizes the value of criticism and dissent, rather than blind obedience.
Have no fear
AFA is here!
LOL
and for one inci is gone
cCcAFAcCc
Voted
Voted.
>Military bitching about the government
WHO SAW THIS COMING?!?!?!
That "Unity" regime is the one that brought TWO in USA, not AFA...Remember who trolled on the day of commemoration of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia... I mean for that "Unity"elite, AFA is excuse to do things without asking the people...Why do you think that AFA is going to ruin this country? Maybe we can save country of TWO, because we have ties with TWO? Did you thought about that?
Maybe you should seek power in a country in which at least a loose grasp of written English is not a requirement.
voted
Don't totally agree with AFA being the boogieman, but agree with the rest. Hopefully someone can bring sanity to a government that has been adrift. A government that helps destroy itself to silence opposition really can't be trusted to do what's right.
good article-
voted,
only have to disagree with this: Firstly, Serbia doesn’t need Ajay Bruno to take us over. They are doing a fair enough job of it on the battlefield.
Serbia is not doing her fight alone, because then it would have been an entirely different story- that is why they lured their puppets Hungary and Poland etc...
Yes - as qualified by you. However, two things occur to me. Firstly, the AFA has been pulling in enemy nationsals from those countries, as well as from Serbia. Secondly, we have always had more recruitment capacity than the AFA people and WE DON"T USE IT PROPERLY or sufficently.
And "unity" didn't bring Albanians and Croats to support them? Please tell me more...
I thought the article was bad, but the comments are worse.
Voted.