Join the new world

There are so many issues to cover it is hard to know where to begin... Let me start by explaining some meanings so we are 'on the same page'.

'Corruptocratic Dictatorship'???

No I am not sure 'corruptocratic' is a word... or a recognised system of Government. We shall perhaps become the first community to achieve this singular dishonour. So let me explain: a 'demo -cracy' derives from ancient Greek in which 'demos' means 'people' and '-cracy' means 'rule by'; thus it means literaly 'rule by the people'. Thus 'aristo -cracy' where 'aristo' means literaly in ancient Greek 'best'. Similarly an 'auto-cracy' derives from 'autokrteia' meaning 'power of oneself' so an autocrat is a sole ruler; the last self proclaimed one being the last Czar of Russia I believe. So a 'corrupto-cracy' means 'rule by the corrupt'. It is fairly easy to see how a corruptocracy can descend into a dictatorship; the most corrupt wins and wins every time. In a way it's an inverted aristocracy in that the best at corruption wins. Of the dawning dictatorship I shall deal later.


New flag?

Of Congress and the Corruptocracy

I do not allege that ALL Congressmen are buying votes. I know there ARE honest Congressmen who would not stoop so low, particularly those representing the CPF. However where corruption is alowed and ignored all the honest Congressmen - and would be Congressmen - are at a distinct disadvantage as are any newer players who may wish ti stand for Congress: Suppose a newer player wishes to stand for Congress? He earns little and probably has no companies... he doesn't have the resources to outbid others for votes so his/her voice is lost and disillusioned he/she leaves for another country. Has anyone noticed the fall in eCanada's population? Even if Wombatmans admirable attempt at a 'baby-boom' works it is likely they would not stay in eCanada as their path forward here may be blocked by corruption. Obviously if one person resorts to these methods others will do so as well to 'keep up' so to speak. So in the end we may well see ALL Congressmen in a bidding war for votes, what they vote for Congress also subject to the same principle of corruptocracy, if principles it can be said to have. We have not reached this stage yet but are well down the path. So I ask ALL those standing for CP and Congress itself:

Will you introduce and support a law against buying votes?

Of course a corrupt would be Congressman wouldn't achieve any success if people didn't sell votes. I have myself been approached in the past to vote for a certain candidate with offers of tanks and it took me several replies to make the candidate understand that I wasn't 'buyable'. Sasha, of course, calls this "rewarding activity"... Get a grip. One click of button to vote is hardly 'activity'. However we, the public, who oppose corruption in our Congress must reject all such advances and better still publicize them to embarrass the would be vote buyer. Accepting the bribe is only worse than making the bribe in that you did not start the process, it is however collusion in the process. It defrauds honest voters and candidates and must be actionable by law. Until this resolved and removed from the eCanadian system democracy is on the back foot, some may survive by honest means but slowly the disease will spread and eCanada will end empty of honest people.


Cos eCanada needs YOU!

The End of 'Political Terrorism'...Realy?

'Political terrorism' is term I am endebted to the naive Sasha for; ty. By this term we should read 'PTO-ing Parties'. Is this a crime? Apparently not... Perhaps Congress and our next CP might also look to this? Sadly I doubt they have the will or the 'balls' as of course such an action may result in their own Parties PTO... So what is 'terrorism'? Here's one definition I found from Google: "the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes." Well if we are scared of the consequences should we act in a particular way we are NOT free of terrorism but living under the constant threat of it. ONLY when a terrorist renounces their methods and disarms do we speak to them as only THEN are we on a level 'playing field'. This does NOT seem to be the case.


Scared?

So recently it has been suggested me that ALL the 'Norsefire Chapters' are not associated. That as one Party after another fell and became Norsefire 'chapters' it was mere coincidence... Rolo has committed no more 'political terrorism' since the illegal pardon granted to him by Congress; that was Code-Y that PTO'ed CanVision... Strange how Rolo started Norsefire and now his agents are not to be associated with him. What bullsh*t... What is the common link between the 'chapters'? If there IS none why are the same methods and name used? Perhaps 'Norsefire' just stands for 'political terrorism'? Could others not then PTO a Party and NOT become a 'chapter'? Evidently they could... but it is not for the honest to use the methods of the dishonest. Currently N-fire Parties are two of the top 5 and block would be Congressional and CP candidates. So I ask this, which if 'political terrorism' is indeed renounced they will surely do:

Will Norsefire Parties combine to form a single Party?

Otherwise their MUST be some connection with the aim to block other 'free' Parties and their candidates. This is NOT an end to 'political terrorism' it is living under it's threat and aquiesiating to it's dictats for 'self preservation'.

Of Dictatorship

I recently raised the case of 'Sweeta vs Congress' in the Court: Sweeta is a legaly elected Congress Lady, no doubts have been raised on the legality of her election, yet was deprived access to Congress voting forums. She was considered a 'threat' apparently... This decision was made, I am informed, by the previous Speaker in his newly voted power to ban any member of Congress he wishes. Of course any evidence against a banned Congressman would be in closed door Congress and being banned from an accused Congressman or Lady could have no chance to refute any such evidence. This ban, we are told by our partly corrupt Congress, can be applied for 7 days at a time. There is nothing to stop it going on ad infinitum though... So we have a situation already where the law says anyone that is elected can be tried and judged in secret without being a chance to reply by a political faction... for any Speaker can be changed by a vote should he fail to act accordingly.


Cool? Very... dead cold.

Nor is this all! Now Congressmen can themselves be judges... meaning that as well a making the law he can - or his faction - can now enforce the law; a clear breach of the 'seperation of powers' required for a working democracy: Guess who was the first to 'volunteer' for this new entitlement....? A thief and 'political terrorist'! Without wishing to fall into 'Godwins Law' which says "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1" I shall leave you to consider the implications of these changes.

The Blue Moose and CP Nominations



I would like to thank the Canadian Progressive Front for their endorsement of my campaign in their nomination. We have a true and vibrant Party where we can disagree we can always agree to differ and remain united in our central aim to promote and make a better eCanada. Here at least we still breathe the fresh air of freedom where disagreeing is not agreeing to terrorism and liable to charges. I say now what I have said our Party: Judging from the number of votes for other CP candidates articles and mine (which I understand is not always a true guide) it would seem as if I would have stood a good chance of winning this election. I don't regret the chance lost myself - being CP is a thankless task at the best of times and here and now particularly so; I wish whoever wins the best.

In his recent article ' CPF's CP Nomination Results (and my thoughts on stuff)' Funky (our PP) clearly disects Sashas logic and stance. This was clear from the start for me and thus I surmise as was said to me by others that Sasha was 'stringing me along'. It is not for me to decide MDPs reaction to this truth.

Many things I am unclear about in this nomianation process and will probably never get answers to such as:

Trentonius THE EPIC POLLS HAVE CLOSED!
04:03 Muglack lying to push an agenda is something that you've been doing quite a lot lately
04:04 Muglack then you claim to not be corrupt and have principals
04:04 SaraD I still don't see where I have lied
04:04 Trentonius Congrats Sara

Trent then went on of course to provide results... which proved he had won. Why 'Congrats'? A wind up I assume.

I ask for no answers. I never wanted CP and am glad not to have the chance. The truth is though that the one candidate who offered a real choice to the path we are now on was not on the ballot. As Exalted Druid commented to Funkys article: "This election will accomplish nothing without Sara." Sadly we are now faced with different emphasis's and not directions; a lack of choice where, judging by article votes alone, a choice was welcomed.

Conclusion and The Future

We are faced with more people leaving eCanada every day. Nor would any new honest person who did not already care stay in a corrupt community. The threat of 'political terrorism' and power in an ever diminishing pond by corruption lie heavy and will strangle the life of free speech and democracy in eCanada if we do not act in defence of our values. We shall be a laughing stock in all the regions of this game - we already are in some. There are NO easy 'wave a wand' solutions, the fight back will be slow and hard, nor can these problems be ignored... At present we have one faction and it's apologists rampant and destroying the Constitution piece by piece. It has been suggest to me that I now stand in the position of leader of the 'seriously?' party, that I should start my own Party, that I run for PP of CPF etc etc etc... People it is for us all exile and loyalist alike to fight together through this. I shall NOT leave the CPF nor run for PP, nor shall I leave eCanada and turn my back on our problems. I shall remain me - a retired MoFa who says what she believes. I shall take the hardest route... to continue and to win; I am a loyal eCanadian!