Supreme Court of eCanada -March 7 update
•
by olivermellors
The Rolo trial began friday evening. The prosecution has completed its case and the defence is about to get started. The thread is here:
http://ecanada.cc/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=12133
Wes Lewis proposed an idyosincratic interpretation of "discrimination" in relation to decisions by CAF, forum and IRC admins. He has moved from eCanada and the thread is locked pending decision. The thread contains some interesting discussion about what is/is not "discrimination". the thread is here:
http://ecanada.cc/forums/viewtopic.php?f=283&t=12177
Kilgour trout has drafted and proposed a new constitution. The proposal has not been posted to a public thread as required by the constitutional amending formula. Nevertheless, Kilgour is asking congress to vote on it in the apparently mistaken view that a congressional vote will be effective to amend the constitution. In fact, the best that can be said is that it will create a statute which is in direct contradiction to the constitution and therefore void. Caution and attention to the amending formula are required.
The Funding Cap Act prosecution will come before the court again on March 19. Congress has been asked by the Vice President to consider retroactively approving any violation which may have occured. The Court had previously adjourned for the purpose of permitting congress to decide whether or not it wished to debate and deal with that issue.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Seems awfully legalistic in here.
Would be nice if you guys didn't perma-ban me from the forums every few months so I could actually see these threads.
Great work coming for all thoses working on Rolo trial.
now this is where the fun is at
loltrial
MOO!!!
Oliver doesn't do his job, he interprets what he wants and leaves out what makes their laws fail, good thing Congress is going to make a new Constitution in this fifth attempt...
😁😁
Wes Lewis: you are correct. Faced with an alternative which makes the law fail, and one which makes it successful, beneficial and harmonious, the Court doesn't choose the fail.
I did want to congratulate you on the decision to send a fair chunk of money back to eCanada. It may not outweigh the past harm, but it is a step in the right direction.