Supreme Court of eCanada -March 21 update
Day 1,217, 20:16
•
Published in Canada 
•
by
•
by olivermellors
A player appeared to purge his past behavior.
After deliberating, a majority of the court (3-0, one pending) found the accused guilty of contempt and imposed sentence as follows:
forum and irc ban until April 16, 2011.
The forum/irc Admins have been advised and have acted accodingly.
Reasons are found on the forum thread, which is here:
http://ecanada.cc/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=12407
A new constitution is in the last days of party president approval. If the vote holds, the measure will pass. In order to address the concern of some party presidents, max maher has done the community a great favour. He has created a French language version of the proposed constitution, which is true to the English language counterpart. He has done so without promise of benefit, without prodding, in the absence of anything except a desire to see the community flourish and prosper. His product is here:
http://ecanada.cc/forums/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=11927&p=197011#p197011
The Court has now ruled that the attorney general act is not in conflict with the constitution, and that changes to the “speaker election” provisions of the Rules of Decorum were within the exclusive power of the congress.
A majority of the court has determined that, given the special act passed by congress and the President’s pardon, no trial date shall be set in the funding act case and that the case itself is dismissed. I have expressed thanks to max maher and lavis knight for having brought the matter to public attention as well as to others. Other judges have delivered written reasons. The thread is here:
http://ecanada.cc/forums/viewtopic.php?f=42&t=12405
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I'd like to appeal my case.
I'll expect my access to be restored in a timely matter so I can post the reasons for my appeal.
have your councel contact the court by public posting to the "public discussion" area of the supreme court forum.
I'd like to represent myself.
Given the court's past in not keeping defendants informed on the status of their case, and how easily the court is manipulated I feel it's only right that I have access so I can see exactly what's happening.
you have my answer. It will not change.
This court is so full of crap
One day people who appoint such positions as Chief Justice are going to have to realize that olivermellors is a know nothing hack
Excellent.
We can do it all over again. I can find someone to represent me and authorize them to post whatever they want.
Then you can charge them.
Then they can choose someone to represent them and write whatever they want.
Then you can charge them.
And we keep going on and on forever making your farce of a court looking like an ever bigger joke.
Just end it now. Give me "In Court" status so I can file my appeal or we can start this roller coaster ride all over again.
That is of course until the next round of Justice appointments. You're probably gonna find that the 2/3rds of congress necessary to re-appoint you is gonna be a little hard to find especially with antics like this.
😁😁^
true, but please vote and subscribe.
Lets recap the facts in olivermellors kangaroo court
Muglack has been banned from the forums and IRC for contempt of court for 1 month
He was banned for, among other things, falsifying my testimony in court and not providing a sincere defense
I was found guilty and sentenced
So, Which one is it? - Either I got a fair trial and Muglack is guilty of nothing, or Muglack sabotaged my trial and I was found guilty because of it
Need I remind the court that my previous trial was declared a mistrial for MUCH LESS......
Chicken and the egg situation....
Does the Supreme Court make olivermellors look like a joke?....or does olivermellors make the Supreme Court look like a joke...?
supabeasty should do another poll....
rolo: i think you will be hard pressed to find many who think you should be acquitted. Quite a few think we shouldn't have permitted you any choice but a permaban. But we will take that heat also. In all cases, someone will be unhappy. As for the deceit for which mug faces a ban... didn't just happen during your trial... but readers can become informed by reading the thread. thank you for your input.
this is a disaster
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/5-weeks-ain-039-t-that-some-ish--1718798/1/20
I want to represent Muglack!
Oh btw, if I have to name my counsil I choose...
Dominik
Rolo
and.....
Pimpdollaz.
If you can have their access restored so they can file my appeal I'd appreciate it.
Merci pour les bons mots, Oliver. J'apprécie beaucoup. : )
romper room
de rien. j'ai eu un véritable plaisir en lisant ton texte: l'espérance que le français ne sera pas complétement négligée tant qu'il y aura de tel joueurs. En ce qui concerne la poursuite Funding Cap, ce fut un litige acharné mais qui aboute quand même des éléments de politique et du juridique. Ce mélange est commun, je le reconnais, et c'est pourquoi la vigilance nous est nécessaire dans un futur présent, faute duquel toutes disputes se verront décider non par la cour mais de façon législative. Ce n'est pas a espérer. Néanmoins, devant la preuve et reconnaissant de ce que les pièces semblent démontrer ils nous semblait que la question politique devrait être discuter au préalable. Le jugement n'est jamais parfait. Seul le bon Dieu voit et comprend tout; pour les hommes, l'humilité est a conseiller.
"Romper, bomper, stomper boo. Tell me, tell me, tell me, do. Magic Mirror, tell me today, have all my friends had fun at play?"
La dernière fois que j'avais traduit un texte en francais, c'était pour la campagne de Wes Lewis. Je suis bien heureux d'avoir renouer avec cette habitude pour une bonne cause, cette fois. : P
En ce qui concerne le FCA, tu peux être rassuré mon ami, je ne suis nullement amer de la décision de la Cour d'avoir déléguer le cas au législatif, ni même de l'issue de l'affaire. Considérant les circonstances, je crois que la cour a extrêmement bien naviguer avec ce dossier, disons, "politiquement chaud". Contrairement à d'autres, je ne vois pas aucune tentative de complots ou de traitement différencié pour certains, du moins provenant de la cour actuelle. Au contraire, j'admire l'indépendance qu'affiche la Cour présentement. Le travail de la cour m'étonne davantage de jour en jour par son efficacité, et je crois que cela est causé par le travail acharné qui consacre le Juge en chef. Je tiens à te remercier personnellement pour cela.
J'espère à tout le moins que je ne suis pas le seul à remarquer ces efforts et que la question de la légitimité de la Cour ne se posera plus un jour. Du moins, ça semble aller dans la bonne direction présentement et c'est rassurant. Une cour active et efficace comme celle actuellement ne peut qu'être un atout important et nécessaire à notre communauté.
Oh god. Supreme Court can't take a joke. And Muglack has the legal right to represent himself.