Stara priča koja kraja nema / The neverending story [HR/EN]

Day 1,382, 08:50 Published in Croatia Croatia by mkey

English version down below.

Prije svega, svim komšijama koji su dali mnogo od sebe u ovom ratu kapa dolje, bilo je uzbudljivo. Čestitke svim saveznicima, svim zemljama koje su povratile svoje regije, svim ljudima koji se polomili da se dođe do ovakvog rezultata. Neki su u svojim naporima uspjeli, neki nisu, ali poštovanje ide svima. Ostalima upućujem opet poziv da malo smanje trolanje, ako to rade i drugi ne znači kako morate i vi. Ne zaboravite kako su trolovi u većini internet zajednica na samom dnu demograskog poretka. Nitko vas ne voli, nikome ne trebate, niste duhoviti.

Predmet ovog članka

Vidim iz brojnih komentara koji dolaze od manje inteligentnih ali i drugih, inače potpuno trezvenih komšija, kako se promiče ideja o tome kako je eSrbija tokom ovog brisanja imala 5 aktivnih ratova. Pokušati se na koliko toliko logičan način (uz minimalnu količinu trolanja) obratiti pobornicima takve i sličnih ideja je uzaludno i redovito ispadneš budala, pogotovo ako si dozvoliš da te neke male duše obore na svoj ništavan nivo.

Činjenično stanje je slijedeće:

1. eSrbija je napala eBugarsku. Pretpostavljam sa željom da ih se obriše, ne znam što drugo. Novih resursa Bugari mislim da nisu imali, fronta je relativno skučena sa svih strana i nema se previše preko Bugarske ikamo putovat, pogotovo stoga što je eSrbija imala regije i u eUkrajini, dakle "dalje" od eBugarske. Bugare se napalo iz objesti i kako bi se pomoglo (donekle) eMakedoniji.

Zar se u ovakvoj situaciji Bugarima ne odobrava pravo da se brane i udaraju kontru? Zar trebaju ući u sukobe s moćnom eSrbijom položenog oružja?

2. eHrvatska napada eSrbiju... ne, ovo je netočno. eHrvatska vlada stavlja zakon na izglasavanje i ČEKA hoće li eSrbija nastaviti sa svojim naumom. Tek kada se vidjelo kako je NE eSrbije prema eBugarskoj neminovan, kreće se u finalizaciju NE eHrvatske prema eSrbiji. Dakle, Srbi su imali dovoljno vremena da se još jednom malo proračunaju, provjere svoje ciljeve i potraže neke druge mogućnosti međutim to vrijeme nije dobro utrošeno. Arogantan stav vodi eSrbiju prema više manje beskorisnom ratu, kasnije i u propast. Također, postojeći je mirovni sporazum u tom trenutku već istekao, tako da nisu "Kroasani još jednom prekršili sporazum što je bilo i za očekivat". Ne, makar ovaj puta ne.

Zar eHrvatska nema pravo napasti neku neprijateljsku zemlju kako bi pomogla savezniku? Pogotovo kada se radi o savezniku koji je par mjeseci unatrag u sličnoj situaciji ostavljen na cjedilu. S kojim je razlogom eSrbija napala eBugarsku? Želite li zaista reći kako su svi ratovi koje eSrbija pokrene sveti, dok su svi ratovi protiv eSrbije samo "ratovi protiv Srbije"?

3. eRumunjska se izvlači iz okupacije i objavljuje NE eSrbiji. Kukaju li Rumunji kako su u rasulu, kako nema sloge, kako su se razbježali po ovom virtualnom planetu i rasipaju svoj utjecaj? Koliko ja pratim, baš i ne, uvidjeli su priliku za napad na OKUPATORA i to iskoristili.

Zar eRumunjska nema pravo na obranu i povratak vlastitih teritorija? Zar nemaju pravo na donošenje taktičkih odluka, tempiranje svojeg vojnog napora kako bi on bio maksimalno uspješan i što lakše izvediv?

4. eUkrajina čini slično što i eRumunjska, iako su se orijentirali na oslobodilačke ratove, nije bilo NE. Prema dosadašnjim zaključcima, niti Ukrajinci očito nemaju to pravo boriti se za vlastitu slobodu protiv okupatora, svemoćne eSrbije.

5. eBIH. Namjerno eBIH ostavljam za kraj, o toj maloj virtualnoj zemljici trošiti previše riječi je suludo. Nakon svega što su razne struje u eSrbiji, ljudi vođenih sumanutim idejama i nevjerojatnim kompleksima učinile eBIH, šteta koja se nanosi već godinama tako što se namjerno satire njihova i tako malena populacija; šteta nastala krađom, političkim podmetanjima i okupacijom....

NEMA APSOLUTNO NIČEGA ŠTO eBIH MOŽE URADITI eSRBIJI ŠTO BI POTONJIMA DALO ZA PRAVO DA IH SE PROZIVA. APSOLUTNO NIČEGA.

Međutim, i ovdje je, po valjda stoti put, eBIH pokazala želju za slobodom i odlučnost u ostvarivanju iste; eBIH koja je u erep povijesti imala jedan napad i jednu osvojenu regiju; eBIH kojom se manipulira već godinama; eBIH u kojoj je veličanstvena eSrbija na kraju i skončala. Govoriti o poetskoj pravdi je suvišno.

Vertikale

Dakle, eSrbiju se napalo sa svih strana i to na jako nepošten način. Što eSrbija radi? Prvo eSlovenci imaju jedan fail pokušaj NE prema eHrvatskoj, međutim gospodi se omilili bonusi koje imaju pa taj rat ne prolazi. U rezervnom rješenju, upada eMađarska (koja je tek nedavno izmolila primirje) te se grozničavo pokušava do granice s eHrvatskom navuć i one naziv čije zemlje neću ni spomenuti, jer su nedostojni. Dakle, s jedne strane imate tri okupatora, eSrbija, eMađarska i ove treće dok s druge strane stoje tri okupirane zemlje, jedna koja se brani i jedna koja pomaže savezniku. I svejedeno Srbi su ti koji drže moralnu vertikalu, koji su "napadnuti" (valjda iz čistog mira) sa svih strana i koji se žale. Ali u redu je, onaj koji gubi ima se pravo žaliti.

Povijest

Za kraj, pogledajmo malo unatrag. Recimo, u ono vrijeme kada su na eBugarsku bila proglašena 3 (rječju i brojkom, tri) NE. Huni, Srbi i Makedonci uz već otvoren rat protiv Turaka. A kukalo se da je šteta što se i one pete ne može dovuć na granicu pa da i oni malo napadaju. Gdje je tada bila moralna vertikala? Što je sa vremenom starog V1, gdje se na eHrvatsku išlo u napad s isključivo barem tri strane? Srbi na Slavoniju, Mađari na NWC, poslušnici Slovenci po Istri ili Lici? Što je s onim vremenima kada je izvršena politička otimačina u eBosni, samo kako bi se eHrvatsku moglo "udariti u bok"? Gdje su tada bile ove moralne vertikale?

Hoće li ova prokleta priča ikada doživjeti svoj kraj? Može li itko sastaviti listu uvjeta pod kojima eSrbija ima biti poražena kako bi se to moglo smatrati poštenim?




---> DISCLAIMER

In this article I refer to this country as eMacedonia or Republic of Macedonia. I understand that there is a region Macedonia in Greece and that some people may find it demeaning their original region name is being used for something else, but since the "Republic of" makes it crystal clear about which geographical area I'm talking about and since the title FYROM is demeaning to say the least, I'll continue using the term Republic of Macedonia in my personal texts. I'm not UN nor a bureaucrat nor a politician. I do not seek arguments, I do not want to offend anyone, be it a Greek from region of Macedonia or a Macedonian from the Republic of Macedonia. Can we just get along?

---
First things first, all among our neighbors who gave all they could in this war I salute them. I congratulate our allies and the countries who have regained their regions, all the people who broke their backs so that this result could ever be possible. Some among you were successfull, some not so much, but my respect goes to you all. To others, once again I send my plea, stop with your trolling efforts. Trolls in most internet communities are the bottom feeders. Nobody likes you, nobody needs you, you are not being funny. You are being ridiculous.

What is this article about

From various comments coming from some of our neighbors, some of them bright some to so much, I see an idea forming stating that eSerbia has been attacked from 5 different directions. Trying to address this people with common logic is practically useless and you just end up feeling stupid. Especially if they manage to draw you down to their pathetic level.

Here come the facts:

1. eSerbia has attacked eBulgaria. I suppose they were driven by their insatiable desire to consume other countries. eBulgaria has no extra bonuses, they are not positioned geographically in an interesting fashion; Bulgarians have been attacked due to wickedness and to some degree to help out eMacedonia.

Is eBulgaria (or any other country for that matter) in a situation such as this not allowed to defend their integrity? Should they just lay down their arms and be overwhelmed by the mighty eSerbia?

2. eCroatia attacks eSerbia... hold on one moment, this is not true. Croatian government has issued the NE law and decided to WAIT and see what eSerbia will do. Only and only when the Serbian attack against Bulgaria was imminent, the Croatian NE was finalized. Therefore, eSerbia had enough time to reevaluate their position, double check their goals and maybe seek some other possibilities. Sadly, that time wasn't spent well, the sheer arrogance has led eSerbia toward a pretty much useless war, which later on meant their demise. Do not forget that the existing cease fire between eCroatia and eSerbia has expired, so the omnipresent construct about inconsistent and treachery driven "Kroasans" doesn't hold its ground. At least not this time around.

Is eCroatia not allowed to attach some enemy country to assist an ally? Especially since this concerned an ally which had been left behind in a similar situation not so long ago? What was the reason for Serbian aggression against eBulgaria? Does anyone really want to tell me how all the wars eSerbia starts are holy and just, while wars started against eSerbia are just "against Serbia"?

3. eRomania has managed to regain one of their regions and declared eSerbia as their NE. Can you see Romanians moaning about the state of disarray, lack of harmony amidst their ranks, the fact most players are running all across this virtual planet, aimlessly wasting their influence? For what it's worth, I haven't managed to spot them doing so, they saw their chance and seized it by attacking their OCCUPATOR.

Does not eRomania have the right to defend themselves and reclaim their own regions? Are they not allowed to bring tactical decisions, timing their war effort so that it may yield maximum results at minimum price?

4. eUkraine did more or less what eRomania did, but without declaring a NE, they solely orientated on resistance wars. Based on some of the conclusions we have reached thus far, it's fairly obvious Ukrainians do not have the right to fight for their freedom, against their mighty occupator eSerbia.

5. eBIH. Intentionally left as last, eBIH is one of those little virtual countries one does not have to say much about. After all the damage various people coming from eSerbia, people with demented ideas have done; damage which has been devastating for years now; damage which practically destroyed the small Bosnian community; theft, political takeovers, occupation...

THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING eBIH CAN DO TO eSERBIA WHICH WOULD ALLOW A RIGHTEOUS STANCE TO THE LATTER PARTY. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

However, after eBIH has shown their will for freedom and decisiveness to reach their gals for countless times over and over again; eBIH which in the erepublik history had only one single attack and one conquered region; eBIH which has been manipulated for years; eBIH the country in which the majestic eSerbia has drawn its final breath. Talking about poetic justice is useless at this point.

Morality

So, eSerbia has been attacked from many sides and in a very dishonest fashion at that. What does eSerbia do to counter? Firstly they have eSlovenia try to declare eCroatia as their NE. I say tried because eSlovenia likes their bonuses a lot more then they like their ally. From the substitutes bench comes eHungary (which has just barely managed to postpone a direct conflict with eCroatia only a few weeks ago) and in a frenzy ploy the country which name I shall not mention in this article as they are not worthy has tried everything to gain a border with eCroatia. To recapitulate, on one side you have three offensive, occupying forces eSerbia, eHungary and the third one. On the other hand you have three countries fighting hard for their freedom, one country merely defending themselves and another one trying to help their ally, losing regions along the way. Regardless, Serbs are the virtuous ones, they have been "attacked" (for no apparent reason) from all sides. And now they are complaining, but that's OK, those who lose have the right to complain.

History

Lets take a look back. Say, that time when eBulgaria had 3 NE declarations cast against them. Huns, Serbs and Macedonians along with an ongoing war with eTurkey (thanks to Wildrunner for setting me straight). They also moaned about how it was unfortunate the country I shall not name can not join the attack. Where was morality then? What about the good ol' V1 days, when eCroatia had to face organized attacks from three sides? Serbs attacking Slavonia, Hungarians going at NWC, Slovenian lackeys draining Lika or Istria? What about the time eSerbia used their politically taken over "ally" eBIH to attack eCroatia from below the belt? Where were the virtuous ones then?

Shall this damned story ever see its end? Could anyone compile a list of conditions under which eSerbia could be taken over so that it would be deemed as honest?