Serious Article: Reform Without Organisation

Day 1,605, 05:16 Published in Canada Canada by SaraDroz
Blitzkreig Theory

As you know I like to give a real life analogy or example of the point I am trying to convey so I ask you to cast your minds back to WW2. It is commonly thought that 'blitzkreig' was a German conception; it was not. Actualy it was orogionaly a British idea developed by a total wierdo (he was into 'Magik' and stuff) called J.F.C.Fuller. Perhaps because he was a bit odd and also because in war the victors see no reason to change, his ideas didn't 'catch on' in Allied strategic thinking. The Germans read his books though and adapted his ideas with Heinz Guderian incorporating the use of radio to give 'real time' management of a battle. The result was the defeat of France in 6 weeks.



The main point of this theory is this: Commit overwhelming forces on the vital sector and hold other sectors; once the breakthrough is achieved keep going! Surprise, as always, is advantage but the breakthough is ALL important. Evidently for this sort of theory to work a plan is required and for a plan you need to work together.

The eCanadian 'Reform Movement'

We have seen a rash of articles starting with Mia's 'Cutting Down the Redwoo😛 Mia for Party President'. Then we see Rylde returning and standing for MDP PP, Sperry onto EPIC, OLloyd standing in N-fire Wolfpac, killer2001 in N-fire MOO and Ardikus V2 in N-fire T.N.S... Clearly there is a desire for change and solid movement to retake our Parties from the 'corruptoctracy'. It is a shame that the self interests of Congress members do not reflect this obvious mood of the ordinary people. I don't know what had sparked this new 'fight back' attitude but as I suggested in my last article it clearly fulfils the EPC desire to dispel 'indifference' and I suggest to them again that they should return and support this.

There is, of course, what might be described as an ethical arguement arguement about these actions: Are you doing what you condemn in 'PTOing' a Party (the 'Sasha confusion')? This depends on a link between the N-fire Parties... if there is NO link why the same name? Why do they not have PP elections in the normal manner? MOO was MOO before it became N-fire MOO and how does changing it back count as a PTO? It is offering choice to my mind and without choice there is no democracy - much like the last CP election and several before that. Taking back choice which is our inherent right from the Garden of Eden ever since is not stealing: You cannot steal what is yours.


Serpent to sue for copyright.

Dangers and Suggestions

Apart from Sperry in EPIC and Rylde in MDP I see four seperate attempts to liberate a Norsefire 'Chapter'. I naturaly support ALL these efforts as essentialy many different N-fire Parties block our choice and so corrupt our democracy. The evident danger is that no single 'liberation' will succeed. Like blitzkreig theory teaches it is wiser to concentrate forces on a single target and achieve a breakthrough there. Furthermore the single target should be decided between all and kept private (so as to achieve surprise). This may seem 'underhand' but when dealing with corrupt thieves of our money and democracy some forethought must be given to guard ourselves. That is not to say that we should stoop to their depths but only keep our counsels to ourselves.



I have no wish to coordinate this but am ready to help set up a network where planning etc can be undertaken so that a 'breakthrough' can be made in one 'sector'. I therefore urge all those standing for PP in N-fire Parties to contact me. Any who would be prepared to help by voting please also contact me so that the would be PPs can assess the numbers. A plan is required and for a plan we need to work together. I will try to be on IRC as well from around 11.00 erep time 'till 15.00.

Conclusion

Noble causes are often consigned to dustbin of history from lack of coordination and planning; a good intention is wasted. I fear this may well befall dispirate uncoordinated and unplanned attempts to reclaim our Parties. I think you will know I support these efforts and until we are more organised I am happy to act as liason. You may of course wish to continue independantly and if so I shall wish you well. Whatever decision is reached is for you to make; not me. I am ready to help but will not stay in any of the 'liberated' Parties. I am not doing this for me and once we know who is with us you can chose another liason. I stand up and put myself forward to say this ONLY because without organisation and planning we face 'over-stretch' and failure. Work together and win!



P.S: Of Recent Events

Firstly the Declaration of War instead of the NE was a mistake. Sure it was a mistake but what's worse Congress passed it! They have NO right to criticise the CP for his mistake when they compounded it. If they had rejected it the mistake would have been costless.

The Org: This is not the current CPs fault; nobody has hacked an org. The org was listed as ours - are we to blame? If it was hacked perhaps so but it was not. It's clearly an evil eUK plot to try to get our CP banned by themselves listing their org as ours. Let us smite them hard!