Results in the German congress elections
Yasmin D'Ahara
These are the results*:
Steinmetze (centre/totalitarian): 18
OMG (centre/libertarian): 5
PPD (center-right/libertarian): 6
SPeD (center-left/authoritarian): 6
KPeD (far-left/authoritarian): 5
LDP (centre/libertarian): 1
Gummibären (centre/authoritarian): 1
* List with the full names/ translated names of German Parties:
Steinmetze: Stonemasons
OMG: Open Minded Germany
PP
😨Patriotische Partei eDeutschlands/Patriotic Party of eGermany
SPe
😨Sozialsdemokratische Partei eDeutschlands/Socialdemocratic Party of eGermany
KPe
😨Kommunistische Partei eDeutschlands/Communistic Party of eGermany
LDP: Liberaldamokratische Partei/Liberal-democratic Party
Gummibären: Gummi Bears
Many would say now: But Wait, that are 7 parties, but there are only 5 allowed!!! Yes, that's true, the candidates for LDP and the Gummibären ran for the OMG for congress. That was allowed by the OMG, because they do not hav enough people for all the contries and because they are a party for those who want to go to congress, but don't want to do normal work for the party. That is also the reason, why in the country stats the OMG has 7 sits and in my list only 5.
And there is another fact in my list, that I want to explain, namely the arrangement of the parties in the three groups. In fact, there are only two big groups of Ideology in eGermany: this, who support a strong government and a weak congress and this, who support a not so strong government and a strong congress.
The first group with Steinmetze and OMG has normally supported a strong government and a weak congress. The second group with PPD, SPeD and KPeD support the Ideology of a not so strong government and a strong congress. The third groups consist of new parties, so I don't really know, which Ideology they support, but I would say, they would support the Way of PPD, SPeD and KPeD.
Why have the Steinmetze so much sits in the congress? Yeah, in Germay the coordination of the elections is normal and every party does it. There sheats, newspaper articels, IRC-explainations and other things, which explain, that the voters where they have to vote, who they have to vote and where they get support and so on. So it is not important, waht the party had done in past or waht it want to do in future but only, how much people they can get to go to vote in the states outside the Saarland (in which all people, who run for congress, are in congress, at least which the states configuration at the moment). This time, the Steinmetze were the most successful election-coordinator.
I think, this would become an interesting congress period, which 7 parties in the parliament and a very strong Steinmetze-party. If this would be good for German politics or not, can you only say in the future (and in view of your ideology, like always).
Comments
We do. \o/
First: I like your explanations, vote.
We have been very efficient at coordinating our votes, yes. And we see it as a duty to do so. We think that a party should support playing the game in an "active" way and for us that means hanging out in IRC, buying each others products, having companies together, gifting each other and look to get some votes in the elections.
And in my opinion it's in this, that our voters support us. They don't have to drive around the whole country to vote for their friend or brother. We get the members of the party to actively support us. Can't see anything wrong with that.
And btw: The "strong gov" position is also caused by the above. We don't wanna talk, we want to do. As is, that is easier to do in a gov. because the congress can't agree on shit, as you know as well. It's not, that we don't respect it. Otherwise we wouldn't wanna be in there, right?
We Did !
wow yasmin ...
deine internationalen artikel sind so ... so ... so ganz anders als deine deutschen ...
als ob sie ein anderer schreibt
für die zukunft: abgeordnete bekommen "seats" und keine "sits"
ansonsten ganz passabel ;>
Hab ich deinen Artikel gestern glatt übersehen 🙂
Vote.