Reconsiderations and an apology..
zblewski
To eCanadians,
Recently, I made a statement regarding the fate of Samuel de Champlain, and stated that the Government of eCanada and himself, alongside his legal adviser, had negotiated a deal in pre-trial negotiations. I released a statement to this effect, as well as a secondary statement on the status of de Champlain. Criticism was expected, and a mixed reply did arrive, however, an error in judgment was indeed made, as stated by several people, and I am willing to accept the fact that I made an error.
In the secondary statement, I had said that Samuel de Champlain was in no way responsible for treasonous act. I did this because of the long and arduous process involved on the part of de Champlain, who has for months been trying to return to a life of normalcy, playing by the rules which govern us all. However, it was inappropriate for me to say that. de Champlain has stated he "doesn't believe he betrayed Canada, but that he worked on the interests of his fellow French-speaker colleagues, as many other people did in France." The fact remains, that no matter what ideas were behind the action, he willingly worked against Canada on more than one occasion, no matter what citizenship he had, or what logic was behind it. He did indeed act against the eCanadian state, and this acceptance of terms reflects that.
I will remind you that this does not change the terms of the deal. He will still have to comply to the terms given by the Attorney General. However, the reasoning behind the statement has changed to reflect the actions of de Champlain. I had consulted with the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister, Chucky Norris, and he agreed that my wording and my statement had been made in error. I am a man of my word, I accept the critisism, and retract the statement regarding the actions of de Champlain. However, de Champlain is still in the crossfire. He has accepted the terms, and, as such, plans on becoming a productive eCanadian citizen who will work and live by the law of eCanada. His present and future actions will carve his path, and the Government wishes him luck. We want the rest of the nation to guide him, and once he has returned to normalcy, forgive him of his past and allow him to make a better future for all of us.
Comments
A big improvement on your last article. Thank you.
The scale of this error demands a response. I still call for resignation and the trying of the guilty parties, including Ozzel (who granted citizenship to Sam).
I would encourage eCanada to not get misty-eyed over a few nice words. Sam's sentence was light, Ozzel escaped unscathed and Chucky maintained his support with the UN. Maintain your rage, and do not accept any concessions. There is no compromise on treason.
What was considered evidence in this trial? As far as I have seen, this decision could only have been reached if you let SdC feed you "Teh Evidence"....
Evidence incriminating SdC has been posted for months in the forums, saying that no one actively posted it on the forums (Chucky's words) for the purpose of the trial is, quite simply, BS. The evidence is on the forums, easily found.
Now, if you did consider everything, show me that, and I will accept this decision. I have less against Sdc than I do against the process that I am currently witness to.
Evidence was collected by the Attorney General, based off of his damage reports and what side he was on, and going through his history. Also, I personally went through the CSIS report I recieved from marcchelala. The CSIS report was basically useless, since it only rehashed common knowelege and made inferences based on character evidence.
Mob rule! Mob Rule!
lynch the traitors
A well-worded redaction, z.
Yet...
"SdC is not guilty of working against Canada" vs "SdC does not feel guilty for working against Canada."
...won't this make people more disatisfied of the results?
I love mob rule
"He did indeed act against the eCanadian state"
He gave us a 2 Q1 weapons though so all's fair. Hell, we should invite GLaDOS and Hassan over here and make them pay us FIVE Q2 WEAPONS in exchange for giving them a shot at congress.
Yes Spencer, I love your logic!
Lmao misty eyed. Good luck pulling that off on me. Thx for the apology now go prosecute some grade schoolers as thats all you seem capable of.
Your error means we will have a traitor in congress soon. Good job
@rylde we may have a traitor in congress soon but we will also have a new PM and MOJ, that is a given
Political correctness sucks ass, big time.