Preserving Canadian Heritage with Bruck's Canucks [UK]
Ralph de Ver
My Friends and Colleagues,
We are all in agreement that it was a sad day when Canada fell. We and our gracious allies fought long and hard as records were shattered in eRepublik. This says something about the caliber of our allies and the quality of the citizens of our great Nation. During these times of war we have proven that we are not afraid to stand up for ourselves at all costs. I wholeheartedly believe that to submit and join PEACE would have been a greater loss than to lose all of our beloved Regions. Now, what lies ahead of us will be an even greater battle because we must all avoid political and military stagnation while we rebuild. Instead of starting a new life, I urge you all to consider a new concept: our eHeritage (please forgive me if I am not the first to speak of this concept).
Now, I am not saying refrain from aiding our allies in their endeavours to push back the threat, the "Peace". All I'm saying is to consider how you will band together to help liberate our Home. Because, at the heart of our eHeritage, that is where your sense of belonging should lie, your Home, Canada. So, how can you do this? How can you avoid stagnation? If you are still an active member of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) then that is a great start to avoid military stagnation. But what about the other side of the coin, the politics? And aren't they so intertwined that, like "Love and Marriage", "you can't have one without the other"? The answer is "yes". We need a place, a group solely dedicated to perserving our eHeritage. Canadians dedicated to freedome fighting and rebuilding. That place/group is the aptly appointed Bruck's Canucks, and you can join us here: http://bruckscanucks.forumotion.ca/.
You see, politics is essentially the science of discussion and debate (political science majors, please don't focus on this statement as I hold a profession in a completely different field in real life). Depending on the type of government, this can be a factor of the abilities of the politicians appointed by the people or simply the charisma of a political power's figurehead. Either way it involves interaction with a group of specialized individuals and response from a general concensus. It can be highly unorganized at times but the outcome of various political sessions are the same; either acceptance or rejection of a proposal.
The way I see it, the upper echelons of the military are a large part of politics (especially in this game) but the military begins its journey as the highly organized. It is the outcome of all the military's efforts that are often unknown unless the intentions are absolutely foolhardy. Please note that foolhardiness is a very difficult variable to quantify and is dependant any given individual's judgement/ideals.
What Bruck's Canucks are doing is combining a military force with politics. We are fighting to preserve our eHeritage and preparing for life after the fallout. We are not against any other military or political faction, in fact many of us hold respectable positions in the CAF and the former eCanadian Government. We come from all walks of life and political orientations with one common goal. If this message fits the puzzle you are trying to complete by playing this game then please join us.
http://bruckscanucks.forumotion.ca/
If you have any questions then please don't hesitate to contact the undersigned or Bruck himself.
Regards,
Ralph de Ver
Comments
Bruck as a general for anything?
No, not again.
Cheers.
You weren't even in ediapers when I was commanding the CAF
I know.
Still, if it weren't for it's name and commander, I might've joined.
This way it's just a piece of constructive (at least!) Bruck propaganda, and cult of personality step.
Couldn't you've named it after some retired Canadian President?
But as Coda said on IRC: "To value Bruck more then your country, come on!"
Country first, then myself, then Bruck. Maybe more people would join our group if we called ourselves Coda's Crusaders (jokes).
If I can bring people together through personality all the better for Canada. I'm not involved in politics and I don't plan to be any time soon.
Yea.. Something else to divide the people. I don't get why everyone thinks they need to create/ join a new 'cult' in order to 'save' the country. I could create my own little cult of followers, and say I want to save Canada. But I choose not to. Instead I choose to fight along with everyone else in the quest to get our country back together.
All these little orgs/ cults do is divide the population. You may think it doesn't because we are 'all working for the same goals.' The problem is everyone has their own way of fixing problems, which then you divide the people as to who's is the best way to fix the issues. Instead of everyone joining one persons ideas, or another's... Why can't we all be members of 'Canada' and work together?
Don't 'join' Bruck, or Jacobi or whoever else wants to make a cult. Instead, 'work alongside' Bruck, and Jacobi and the rest of eCanadian's to get our country back!
We will not hold any qualms with citizens that decide not to join. Nor will we blast organizations similar to ours. Everyone and every group is of their own opinions and beliefs and we respect that.
A cult holds so many negative connotations and, as such, a cult we are not. We would appreciate it if you would discontinue using that term. We were established as like minded citizens actively participating in some camaraderie and fighting towards liberating and rebuilding our country because this is what makes the game fun.
We don't believe that we are dividing any country because we will endeavour to keep good ties with others. But if people want to try and shut us down for fighting for what we believe in or because of any personality clashes then so be it. We choose to take the higher road and continue on having fun in the game.
Couldn't agree with you more that we must all work together but, to do so, we must abandon preconceived negativism about each other. Avoid publishing bad press about other groups and citizens and stop unqualified labeling in comments; it just makes Canada look bad.