You are reading an article written by a citizen of eRepublik, an immersive multiplayer strategy game based on real life countries. Create your own character and help your country achieve its glory while establishing yourself as a war hero, renowned publisher or finance guru.
•
by Arthur Reynolds
Just a quick word about peace, PEACE are not peacful. Ivading and occupying countrys is not peacful, it is completly the opersite. They should be called TERROR
Wiki | Latest Updates | Forum | Blog | Contact | Jobs | Erepublik media | Terms of Service | Privacy | eRepublik Laws
Follow us: 
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Articles
Our other games: War and Peace | World at War | The Great War Rivals | Game of Nations
Copyright © 2007-2024 eRepublik
Comments
Relax, that's what we call "PEACE enforcement" 🙂
i dont see anything wrong with bringing peace and democracy to countries that support terorrism.
I don't se anything wrong in beating the crap out of your enemies. Old Atlantis countries (and actual EDEN and FORTIS ones) are enemies. Now that the table has turned and PEACE is the strong alliance you call us Terrorists? lol.
Are you referring to Slovakia, Karantanec? >.
I'm just taking this all as part of the cycle.
It is similar to a cycle - one side wrongs the other, then the other side wants revenge, then the first side wants revenge for the second's revenge... and so on. Its a cycle that doesn't have to continue, though.
We could meet their aggression with overwhelming force and prevent them from conquering others, and act as true peacekeepers. We could have broken the cycle. Instead, PEACE uses its strength to become aggressive itself - conquering others and occupying land. And unless PEACE stops soon, it will be dealing with the reprucussions of becoming the aggressor.
Well in my view of the cycle PEACE is going to overtake eUSA, after the last territory is gone the eUSA will be reinvigorated, and with new leaders will fight more efficiently and take back their territory, they will probably try to claim land that doesn't belong to them, and begin their wane again, but should have learned a lesson and maybe keep a stalemate going. Long time in the future of course.
We can hope they will learn the lesson and not try to occupy others again, but it would be better if we just learned it, then we wouldn't need to worry about them.
I've always since my first few weeks here promoted the idea of keeping nations in their own borders and returning control to the natives. I'm generally anti-alliance.
I don't really understand how PEACE is doing anything wrong in the current war. USA has been pushing against PEACE countries for a long time, trying to hurt them in any way possible. They have been rude and fall in-love with trolls. USA had an attack coming, and they know it. If they didn't want to be attacked, they shouldn't have been so rude, they should have supported Germany when it was against Sweden, they should not have tried to hurt PEACE countries.
It is pretty just turning them down and showing them that they are wrong.
Rangeley: The objective is not conquring USA and the others. It's only breaking their DS and Hospitals, so they are less powerful and are not a threat. This is called strategy. And it's a method of defense nonetheless.