Join the new world

Already have an account? Login



What is this?

You are reading an article written by a citizen of eRepublik, an immersive multiplayer strategy game based on real life countries. Create your own character and help your country achieve its glory while establishing yourself as a war hero, renowned publisher or finance guru.

Open Interview for Tim09

Day 559, 16:38 • Published in Australia

• by Icey1174

Tim09,

I write this article in request that you answer a few questions for our citizens as you plan to run for PM.

1. Will you allow Cabinet Members that have been proven by the Admins to have multiple accounts, as government officials in the game we should be supporting the Admins decisions?

2. Following on from Question 1 will you allow Senators to continue if they have been perma banned by the admins?

3. Will you try and put a more strict code of conduct around how Senators and Cabinet members behave in public? For example if they flame have a temp ban?

Thank you for taking the time to read this article and answer these questions.

Comments

Mr. Smo Day 559, 16:39

The answer is yes to all of those questions and what will you pay for a Q3 house?!?

Australian Warlord Day 559, 17:49

How can you answer for him unless you're attempting to dictate what he is to say?

Icey1174 Day 559, 17:55

AW, I think someone deleted their comment. SORRY! 🙂

John

Derek Apollyon Day 559, 19:42

You are aware Icey, that a "stricter code of conduct in public" would also apply to you.

Tim09 Day 559, 21:07

To answer your questions. If anyone in my cabinet comes under ADMIN suspicion, they would be asked to stand down. This is for permanent bannable accusations. For temporary bans, I would take it on a case by case basis, since some temp bans are more serious than others and aren't usually a result of deliberate cheating. (for example Patti got a 24 hour ban for publicly questioning the admin)

I do not have a say on who is in senate. This is for the senate themselves and the speaker to decide. I will suggest that someone banned is stepped down but I will not over-step my authority.

3) Who decides what flaming is? I support the amendment that Ranger-Bob proposed. Once again I am running to lead the nation not judge senate. I have control over cabinet and I have made myself clear to prospective cabinet members that I want a thouroughly professional cabinet. Senate is not under my control. That is the juristiction of the speaker primarily. My vision is that senate thinks and proposes for themselves, not that I rule with an iron fist. If a senator, like yourself, thinks there should be changes then they should propose such a change.

Newt Gingrich Day 560, 16:47

As a Senator I applaud Tim09 for letting the senate deal with its own issues/disputes internally. The PM has jurisdiction and the Senate has his. If he were to try to impose himself on the senate that would be a disservice to Democracy; I'm fairly certain no one was a Dictatorship.

Post your comment