Of Congress and Wizards
•
by Frodo Tea Baggins
Today I made one of the most fantastic discoveries. You may think Canada is boring, politics humdrum, and nothing crazy ever happens. Today I put a lot of thought into matters and discovered that Canadain congress is one of the most exciting places to be right now in all the world.
Now some may question how iI can claim such a thing seeing I was just banned from congress for 3 days for doing the proper thing and moving business along. Well that was before I seen the obvious signs of what was really going on. I must admit I was wrong because I was unaware of what was right under my nose until I sat back and put deep thought into it.
Prepare yourselves for a shock Canada as I reveal to you that the Canadian speaker of congess is indeed......
Yes indeed, Harry Potter.
How can I claim this, why it's simple really once you add up the clues.
Let's think about this statement, nobody objected in congress, yet the speaker knew people disagreed to it that didn't post. The first choice is highly unlikely and I won't consider it, that the speakers party disagreed to it on their private forums and the ingame vote was held up intentionally. This is highly unethical and I won't even amuse such an idea towards such a person to be in an esteemed position.
Second choice, the speaker is a wizard, can read minds and see the future. Yes this is the most logical conclusion
The Speaker of the House for Canada is Harry Potter
I've never been so proud
Aeriala
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I wonder what his animus is?!
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
I just love this post.
Personally, I would have classified the speaker was more like Severus Snape or Lord Valdemort... LOL
WIN
The speaker is a doink.
I'm a wizard. I have to be. I mean if the other option is my party discussed it on our forums and we decided what I want then I'd have to be. I haven't been to my party's forums in.... 5 months? So clearly the other logical option is that I MUST be a wizard.
There's no other way people from this game, in my party or otherwise, that would converse and exchange ideas with me. I mean it's not like I spend any time having conversations with people on IRC, or receive private messages either in game or on the forum.
Nope, that just doesn't happen. This has to be some big MDP plot to ruin the country. Of course the other option is that you're a bitter old man who has absolutely nothing going on his life except the pixels in this game so as soon as you get a slap on the wrists for something you completely over react instead of being a man and stepping up and take responsibility for your actions.
Naaah, that's can't be it can it?
As a member of MDP I will say that this accusation is completely false. There hasn't even been a post on the MDP forums in over a week, let alone a discussion on anything involving congress. And I also voted yes, both in game and on the forums, so our entire party is definitely not against this.
Aeriala's still butthurt that Rylde ran him out of the country back in February and he focuses that rage on MDP instead of letting it go. Just ignore him.
lol still hiding behind your criminal best buddy.
Muglack, you are comments on this article are inapropriate because currently you are a Speaker of Congress and a public figure who should be much more polite with his public appearance. Your actions and your writing is representing the whole Congress in this virtual society.
I will now elaborate why that particular parts of your comments are inapropriate.
Your first post is a fairly reasonable until this part: ''Of course the other option is that you're a bitter old man who has absolutely nothing going on his life except the pixels in this game so as soon as you get a slap on the wrists for something you completely over react instead of being a man and stepping up and take responsibility for your actions.''
This is a clear example of argumentum ad hominem or a logical fallacy, combined with unprovable speculation and indications.
Your second stament is also just a collection of an unprovable speculation and indication and that is not a level on which one public person who is representing the Congress should discuss or comment.
Yeah, I know that you will now say to me me that Aeriala is a tempered man who is acting on his impulsiveness and that he just wrote a smearing article against you. But you should, you should never allow yourself to subordinate on his irrational way of discussing. With that act you just spoiled an image of one honorable function in the eyes of the public.
Speaker should debate with facts and arguments not with personal attacks and speculations.
S.Dan...it's erepublik...and also eCanada...you're aiming a bit high.