New Lies by WHAW
Australian Warlord
Quote WHAW : :More Lies by the Puppet of Romania..
You had your Donations List Wiped..
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/1302500/0
Whether you requested it, or you did so manually is still questionable."
- - - - -
This is the new round of lies by WHAW & those behind WHAW. By the same conjob, you can claim that everybody has wiped their donation histories.
Preditorian
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/1346488/0
Br0adside
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/1209725/0
MachineMadness
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/179722/0
Maybe they have something to hide. Maybe they're getting 100's of gold from their eIndonesian masters? Or maybe it's just showing how dishonest WHAW & those behind WHAW are.
Comments
I think we are getting sick of the word "lies", you have the word "lies" more then anyone i know!
Please STOP!
How about fibs, untruths, fiction or fabrication?
yeah they are better 🙂
Seriously, does any one of you care what you are putting the rest of us who play this game with you through?
You all hate each other we get it, AW you presented all of this in the comments section and refutted it, why make an article about the same thing you all ready spoke about.
I really wish all parties would STFU once and for all and let the rest of us play the game with out your drama.
And I know AW, your going to say that I'm allowing them to get the better of you or something like that but I'm asking BOTH/ALL of you to quit it.
If you all feel such a need to yell at each other then do it on the forums or PM or send love letters but stop destroying the eAustralian media with it.
I do not wish to enter into debate with any of this, but I will say that I was unable to access my org's past donations list tonight.
@Cerridwen : Your problem might be a bug but the deliberate fabrication by WHAW & their supporters in yet another attack against me isn't.
ScotyWest
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/270771/0
http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/270771/1
Sorry Scoty to use you as a example here however if you click on each link above, you'll see what I'm referring to.
AW change the 0 to a 1 at the end of each of the links you provided in your article and you will see the donations.
oh im stupid. my bad AW its 3am lol..
1.Where did I say I supported WHAW?
2.I have nothing to hide. It was obviously a bug that you couldn't view my donation page.
3. http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/donate/list/179722/1
I expect an apology.
Keep digging deeper AW...
@Alex Australis
I agree wholeheartedly. This Us vs Them mentality is getting pretty old, no matter which side it's coming from.
Doesn't everyone have more productive ways to use their time?
Dude if I was getting 100's of gold from Indos, dont you think id have something to show for it? to be honest, ive only got 3 gold and 36 AUD, and u can wish the 3 gold away soon neway.
Let's eat his flesh.
I'm going to make a humorous article soon about how to kill him and crush his ideas.
I just don't get why the collaborationist crew comes in guns blazing to every single article AW posts, they MUST have something to conceal. The effort they go to discredit, argue and derail into personal attacks is uncanny.
We don't. He's been bugging us for months and eventually he will go. We tried ignoring him, blocking him, reporting him, but it just doesn't work!
Ah yes, the idea that if you flame & attack people enough, that they will go. That's the typical Socialist way, claim that you support democracy & freedom of speach, until that is that somebody has the guts to say that you're incorrect in any particular area. This goes beyond whether this person or that person is correct in any particular topic, it goes to the heart of one's character. And the character that people like Mouj displays when someone has a contrary viewpoint is something that everybody that enjoys freedom should be concerned about.
Umm, I believe there's a difference between offering some constructive criticism when you believe someone is poorly informed and blatantly slandering their views.