My Tryst With The Law...
Claire Littleton
As some of you know, I was recently temp-banned for not responding to the Admin's warnings for vulgarity in the manner in which the law states. I responded to an email sent by the Admins as opposed to Appealing their ruling in the proper channels. Honestly, I didn't know that was a rule that would get you banned. That was my mistake for not knowing the laws.
To be honest, I could care less about the banning. What I do care about... ***EDIT: Rest of Article was Taken Out to Avoid Possible Banning during the Congressional Elections... I am so Against Censoring, but for the Sake of the Party... I'm Censoring Myself. Enjoy the Photo of the Hot Man Below***
Coming Soon: The Results to the 7 Hottest eGays on eRep! With Picutres! The winner gets 5 gold!!!!
Sincerely and Sensually,
THE Claire Littleton
Please Remember to Vote & Subscribe!
Comments
Oh no -- hope his gun isn't too large ;P LALALALA
BAN!
Rule #7
Yeah, I never actually read the rules. Perhaps I shoulda.
No showing nipples, that's vulgar. Cover those things up on that guy.
My comment was meant to help you understand why a mod might take down this article.
Hot Claire Bear. I voted it up.
I knew you would, Medy... I knew you would!
Please don't get banned again Claire...
FIGHT THE POWER...
...with half-naked men. Not my cup of tea, but I do like to fight Admin whenever possible.
Well I suppose it wouldn't be easy for them to delete it after people have already read it, right? 😁
My theory of banning is related to volume. The more you post the more likely you are to get banned. I think you are not supposed to tell people that they are stupid for example. You can only find out so much of this by trial and error. It doesn't seem to be the seriousness of the offense but the rate at which you commit the errors. The idea that "ignorance of the law is no excuse" is associated with laws that are finite and understandable and codified. Allowances like points and fines and time erasures I associate with allowing you to feel out the laws because the laws are whims and preferences.
I kinda wish we could properly learn from our mistakes or even the mistakes of others if they are not going to codify it at least tell you after they make a decision. I have fellow Monetary market traders that I think do the same things I do (maybe not) and they got banned. You can't find out if it is a behavior you have in common or not. I share some frustration here. but you should try this again after points go away. Because they care about the rate at which you break the rules, Obviously.
Voted!
End the hate
FIGHT THE POWER! lol but wtf admins.
I wonder what would the admins would do if they found out all the guys were playing erep shirtless?
youll get 3 fp lol
Yeah, publishing pics of women in thongs and pics of women with obviously large and partially unclothed breasts is cool.
But... any depiction of the male form not completely covered?
My GOD! Call out the staats police!
You have to remember, you are going by the standards of Bucharest.
It never was one of the capitols of the Warsaw Pact opposition, and it still isn't.
Now, let's put out a lot of ta-ta pics, and thong pics. Which are okay. As long as Nicolae Ceacescu would approve, I think we should, too.
HAWT TRYST!
😛
Thanks for the photo.
Admins, how they make me lol
I'm confused you almost got banned for posting that pic? What's wrong with it? Didn't our previous president have a chicks ass shot as his avatar? lol
BOO HOO!! Cry me an eRiver!!
I'm sorry I deleted my old paper, where my eRepublik Tutorial for Women contained tons of hot pics. Indeed, it was considered offensive, but I only got FP 😁)
@Jon Barack Bluejacket, Romania was a member till 1989...and it's Ceausescu btw 🙂
I voted just because someone actually knew the word tryst, and used it in the proper context.
get over it. it was a temp ban
SEoA, this is exactly the opposite of the correct context for the word "tryst." A tryst is a prearranged meeting, and Claire's banning was anything but prearranged.
Voted anyway, because it's Claire.
You aren't real good with sarcasm are you Andra?
I don't like rules.
"""SEoA, this is exactly the opposite of the correct context for the word "tryst." A tryst is a prearranged meeting, and Claire's banning was anything but prearranged."""
Wasn't it?! 😉
@You dumb-asses: If you read it carefully, I said I could give a frick about the temp-ban. I'm mad at the reasoning behind why my articles were pulle😛 There wasn't one!
what a load of crop... C.L.,,, "not knowing the rules" is a kinda sorta lame excuse - that being said, i'm starting to think that just maybe the time i've invested here to date has been a total, as opposed to just a partial, waste.
i don't have a dog in this fight, but me thinks, imho lmao, admin is lucky that an outgoing, active player such as yourself came back from the land of ban, after being sent there for such cheeseynees.
no, i don't know you, or have even had any contact with you. i do though, know how to search, and i do know how to read. ;O) one other thing i do know how to do, is open my mouth and have my say. good, bad, or indifferent, it's my piece and i'll say it, any way, and any where, i please.
then there are some of the comments here... pro or con, there's nothing wrong with spouting your opinion in a forum such as this. between what appears to be veiled threats, stupidity, and just being mean, do some of you really have to be such a sausage about it? ? ?
oh, and zane,,, not only shirtless, but in some cases, i suspect a few of these guys would be lucky to be wearing their chones, +*yuck*+, let alone tshirts.
Again, if you read my article you will see that I claimed total responsibility and I quote myself:
"Honestly, I didn't know that was a rule that would get you banned. That was my mistake for not knowing the laws."
Lame or not, it's the truth and again, I don't care about the ban because the reason for the ban is not what made me mad. As for the photos of the men. I will give you the breakdown. One was shirtless, 3 were in nothing but their underwear (camo underwear), one was holding a gun over his business completely covering it up and the last one was holding a machine gun up to himself (fully clothed) in a manner that it was an extension of his boy business. None of which showed anything you wouldn't see in a PG-13 Rated movie, if not a G rated movie.
Oh and that was just the first time the article was posted. The second and third times I only had the men in their underwear. I took out the one of the guy with the gun over his business and the one pretending the gun was his man part. I thought those maybe crossed the line, but apparently not as it was pulled 2 more times. The 3 time it was pulled I had the photo above and another guy in camo underwear with dogtags on. There was nothing vulgar about it.
You go Claire!
Fight the power!
Oh lawds Claire, controversial as usual 😉
With the amount of vagina and fake titties I am forced to see just by existing in this game, I'm surprised you can't show a fully erect penis in an article.