Join the new world

So uh, how can you be so sure of this Ajay, and we know you've made baseless claims before

All accounts signed on, voted systematically and signed off. All accounts have no jobs, no party id's, no papers and have roughly equal combat experience. I reported them all fortunately.

>All accounts signed on, voted systematically and signed off. All accounts have no jobs, no party id's, no papers and have roughly equal combat experience. I reported them all fortunately.

So how were you able to keep track of all 4 to make sure that they were on at the same time?

I check online now every 5 minutes on election night. I kept careful watch.

>I check online now every 5 minutes on election night. I kept careful watch.

So how do you know that these people were the ones to watch?

Suspicious much?

Holy f*ck, geek alert! Not that being a geek is a bad thing, but this is serious geek activity! Every 5 minutes!? Jesus...

Actually, I just looked over these accounts, and as much as I hate to say it, I think I actually have to agree with you that these are multis.

I'm still a little suspicious as to how you knew to watch them and how you were able to check them all.

If we are to be beaten, let it be fairly by individual voters. This is a very low act by whoever is behind this.

Sorry Ajay, but even if you were telling the truth, I doubt many people are going to believe you. They'll probably think you made them yourself. It would probably do you better to just remove this article. If you reported it already then the admins can take care of it.

How do you know who they voted for?

I'm glad that someone so familiar with multi tactics is out there watching for voter fraud...I'm reminded of the old adage "takes one to know one."

Yes, I made them myself to sabotage my own candidates. YOu're a genius!

Actually again, as much as I hate to admit it I think Ajay is right, at least 3 of the 4 people he listed (I didnt check the fourth) had similar donations between a single other person and his org.

I didn' say I thought that. I'm just saying that's what your public image will lead people to believe. Joe Schmo at least.

So when you multi it's ok, when others do it's suddenly wrong? Great double standard....

definitely a double standard, but in all fairness what the other guy (seems) to be doing is equally wrong. In the end I think Ajay's got it right on this one.

First of all, I do not multi. Second of all, I do not deploy armies of voters to screw with results. Third of all, Philip and Marmaduke have both made strong statements against me in the past. This is a matter of fairness. They were screwed over by a cheating punk.

If all the accounts signed on at the same time, then they can't be multis since no one can type on 4 keyboards at the same time. It's called organization, you need to learn a thing or two from real PTOers that have actually succeeded.
And if it were a script, they would have more than 4 accounts.
Also, how do you know their names?

No dude. They are the same person. Look them over

I too am wondering how exactly Ajay knew to check these EXACT accounts. I'm not saying he's behind it, but it's still suspicious nonetheless.

Course, Ajay will probably never release this information, because it will just further instill his image as a stalker.

It's called checking Online Now

And am I the same person as Mesther, and Sunsetter, and Ciprihino, and Slider, and. . .
And for the record theres nothing that says they are the same person, or even controlled by a script.

Quick Question Ajay:
How many multi accounts do you have?

I am quiet impressed, actually.

"So how do you know that these people were the ones to watch?"

He checked the Who's Online page: http://www.erepublik.com/en/list/online_users/South-Africa/all/1" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/list/online_[..]ll/1

"How do you know who they voted for?"

One voter comes online, one more vote for the candidate. One voter comes online, one more vote for the candidate. One voter comes online, one more vote for the candidate. One voter comes online, one more vote for the candidate. Conclusions are easy to draw.

If you've got the time for it, and the numbers are small enough, it would work pretty well.

see reply here:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/free-south-africa-188722/1" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/newspaper/fr[..]722/1

Just so everyone knows an Ajay multi was also running for Congress in Texas in the eUS. Some people have screen captures of this multi saying it was actually Ajay, as well as of Ajay saying that he controlled this multi. The multi lost the election to a far better candidate who wasn't a multi, and now Ajay and the multi have been reported be many people. With any luck the admins will take action and ban them both soon.

Oh, and Hi South Africa!

So when you Multi-Account its A-ok Ajay, but heaven forbid if anyone else does it against you.

Nice to know your high and mighty standards are only offended when its someone aside from you cheating.

I am not cheating and I do not multi. ALso, systematically voting candidates down with multis is a FAR different matter.