Indian political scenario having troubled undercurrents..! ?
•
by S M Nair
Active campaigning in recent elections seems to have stroke some soft spots in Indian leadership.
There has been increasing discontent, regarding the need for the existence of two political parties in eIndia. There has been accusation from some parts implying to the wasting of resources that can be other wise used for our nation’s development to run a political party against the current leadership. The accusation also pointed to usage of the relatively new DPI by the members to forward there own personal growth and UI members also said that DPI lacked national commitment.
The current government is run by India United the larger of the two parties the first political party in independent eIndia and mostly represented by IU members which has raised eIndia to its present condition.
Comments by DPI leadership have not been available as of now regarding the accusations leveled against the party in our national forum.
Details of the discussions are available at our national forum here>>
http://forum.erepublikindia.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=789
(The article is based on authors observation alone and do not have any political intention)
Editor
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Just to make note for you mate...Current Govt. has many ministers from DPI too..Governemnt doesnt run by party....
Like to say -
Our MOFA kansarasumit is from DPI
Our CoC head - Dragons is frm DPI
NPF head is from DPI
Many NPF members are from DPI
And more to that DPI PP jelly is also working in Defense...with a IU minister..
So its not at all about parties in india..and more or less both parties views are same abt INDIA...
This kind of article is why we dont need two parties at this stage in India, yes if you want to have a voice great but why make trouble towards a party that has done nothing but develop India in the right way.
1 - We liberated India
2 - We regained 10 regions
3 - We built a strong economy
4 - We build a great community
Quite simply the IU Party has done such an amazing job developing India that the DPI is troubled to find a reason to justify its existence in my honest opinion as in two months I still dont know what they are supposed to be providing other then a distracion to our effort to regain regions, yes I will say it again all the DPI has done so far is cause internal arguements which take up valuable government time which could be spent trying to regain regions.
NOT VOTED!
I agree on that mate.. Thats exactly what is being said in the forum too shail. but at the forum, words of accusation has been put forth against DPI. Let the guyz from DPI respond on it mate.
(at the start itself, let me speak my mind.. This aint my party any more than it is urs)But how has having a political opposition hindered the growth mate.
Has there been any critism or personal attack against anyone in UI from DPI
If any thing India could have achived, and was denied jzt becoz of the existance of DPI?
S M Nair yes there has been opposistion and also we have been prevented from moving on........
Pheenic & Rituraj have both made scathing attacks on myself shail and the IU for absolutly no reason.
I will speak from me alone but I personally have spent so much time on sorting out internal politics ensuring India is secure from blowing itself up that I have not been able to spend as much time negotiating with Indonesia and Iran to regain our regions, this to me is so frustrating that if you want the truth ask the guys who know me, I almost left India last week out of utter frustration at having to log on and sort out arguements and internal politics that I said enough is enough, if it wasnt for certain people asking me to stick it out I would now have left the game as the fun goes out of it when people become motivated by greed.
Simply put these internal politics ARE stopping us from developing quicker.
David I don't know what Rituraj said but as a DPI member I would like to distance myself from his stand. He has not cooperated with any other DPI member as far as I know. So that is his private opinion, nothing to do with the party. (Did he finally sign up on the forums?)
I am against bickering.
Having said that, I feel its unfair to assume that you should be allowed to have a completely peaceful domestic political life just so that you can conduct your international duties. I mean, domestic politics IS part of your political life whether you like it or not. (Also I would like to support SM Nair's skepticism - DPI existing = not getting regions back? Is that really what you are saying?)
I don't find the DPI struggling to justify its own existence either. As of now I see its basis as being that simply of a responsible watchdog.
I'll try to get onto the forums again to see what all the hullabaloo is about.
vigi
agreed with ~vigi~
I never really tried to sabotage IU or sumthing like that. Instead there were occasions when I asked ma voters to vote the worthy candidate rather than DPI or IU member. I have also advised my friends (IU members, cant tell you their names tho) that your party is throwing in a lot of gold and effort to get their candidates in to the congress, why betray them and vote me ???
You vote the guy who u think can take India to the next level, but please don't discriminate on the basis of parties.
FYI:
shail says most of govt is DPI, and we r doin good AND in contradiction david says DPI is using up govt's time for nothing.
Fine, except for pheenic and rituraj, who else do you think are responsible for this Mr.e😜rez ???
Who else do u think are wasting your time ???
You have said it yourself that u dont interact much with the likes of DPI.
I personally never really tried to discriminate, and u know who it is trying to discriminate now. 😃
Just coz, the party was founded by an a_hole and u found jerky nature in a few DPI's members doesnt essentially mean the whole party is against the government.
I voted yes to the board of seniors, why do u think i did it ??? For the betterment of india.
Though I had an intuitive that sumthing like this gonna happen someday, I voted yes to this. I thought u never discriminated b/w IU and DPI except for the prez elections... but i was proved wrong.
thanks
trojan