In Response to Oprah's PTO Attempt of IA

Day 1,448, 21:45 Published in South Africa South Africa by nick jones

This is a wall of text sorry!
Now we saw that a fellow citizen Oprah wishes to “change things” to kill IA ,this should not be our intent and her attacks upon IA are nothing more than a petty assault upon our republic (which she can’t seem to decide what we are Democracy or a Republic since he made clear in her IRC debate that we were clearly in one camp)Originally his main contention was activity, now he is basing his judgments upon what we see from the outside , he is NOT a member of IA as of the writing of this article and to the best of my knowledge has never been. Who is Oprah to cast these broad statements upon IA when he isn’t there on the actual inside getting the understanding of being in their shoes? She states that it’s a zombie party, now I would be willing to concede that there are a lot of two clickers in IA but the thing is with that is ALL parties have two clickers in them. We can’t base inactivity as a reason to bust up a party, if that were the case nearly all our parties would be subjected to this explosion planned. The thing is that the new generation is trying to step up , look at Had3z in his CP candidate interview , he was articulate calm straight to the point and was clear in his vision, how is this not a product of party activity? He never held prior office so he got it somewhere. He later reveals in IRC conversation that his real contention is the coalition between IA and SADP, now just a little background on this Both parties after months of negotiation, debate, and votes in each party we decided to swap backings for CP elections because both of our parties decided that it would be in both our mutual interests to engage in a coalition.
Let me be clear this was NOT a backdoor deal had Oprah been in IA or SADP you would have clearly known and would have been welcomed to oppose or support, but Oprah did not , he knows nothing of the traditions or cultures of each party especially when they are not members of that party. The SADP vote was unanimous and even after the vote closed people who missed the vote put in comments that they liked this idea. I do not know how the vote ended in IA but I am sure Had3z would love to reveal that to prove our point. Breaking IA stands to screw everyone that Oprah doesn’t like, IA and SADP, because in the event of an IA dismantle PSU would be #1 and OOPS would be #2 this clearly shows that there is an evident conflict of interest in what he is trying to do, and instead of embracing accepting political theory (coalition governments) and forming an OOPS PSU or something else, he just wants to kill it because it’s not fair. Get over it life’s not fair, and instead of killing it because you don’t like parties deciding what they want, you sir want to make parties do what Oprah wants. Is that not contradictory to your whole point of freedom? It sure smells like tyranny to me…
On activity if you break IA it solves nothing the dead weight will only migrate which stands to hurt IA and bolster your own personal interests because it’s clear you don’t have IAs best intent in mind nor eSA’s you have your own personal inflated egotistical agenda that will only exacerbate the current problem and lead to a total implosion of the political culture of this nation. Now who is Oprah to say that IA can’t fix itself? The thing is he doesn’t know that it is entirely in the realm of possibility that IA can change and become much more active its and individual problem not a collective problem killing IA will hurt all parties. If you want real action work in the scene not as destroyed but builder of the individual reach out to newbies and two clickers and spur them to action don’t burn their house down and expect them to magically decide to become active. Now to address those who thing that this deal was for my own reasons, it’s not like I explained in IRC I put my party first and on the CP support this coming month the first person I went to asking to see if he wanted the nomination was Crumoet, it is my intent and my drive to have SADP vote on who they want and IA upholding their half of the bargain to oblige us as we did with them, IA support. Party first forever, if my party doesn’t want me to be the nomination then I will push for me not to be the nomination, I place my party before my own interests, unlike oprah who only thinks of his interests. In short the IA PTO will solve nothing; it is a PTO attempt and stands to destroy the very fabric of our nation