Join the new world

Great Article, like last months one like this..

BTW, I haven't made many posts because someone just showed me the forums 😑

*Virginia - Mike Schmittson (Li😎- 12 Posts - Last Seen Over One Hour Ago*

No comment...

John C's inactivity was due to confusion. He was trying to register in Franco's forum. Just wanted to state that.

I hope this article weighs on the minds of America in the next election.

CVP sounds better then CP plus it distinguishes us from the NP

Fixed, sorry about that DF.

oh and btw there are some congressmen in the Nationalist Party...

How does posting and being seen in the last 12 hours constitute inactivity? Just because I'm not a post whore like so many other people doesn't mean I don't speak with others and have a strong voting record. My apologies to NM for not having more one or two word posts about off-topic crap on a message board filled with self-serving political agendas. You want my true activity record? See it here: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/update-from-nm-732669/1/20

Should one move to an asterick ** state, if one has an interest in political participation?

...or was that not an intended message?

@GoBucks - Some of us are newer players and haven't had a year to make over 1,000 posts. That's hardly fair to the people who have been around less than 4 or 5 months isn't it? Just because someone posts moderately instead of constantly does not make them "inactive" or "non-participatory". Also, you only have 24 posts but I see you are not "inactive". Where do you draw the line exactly? 10 posts?

And when did you look at my posts? I made 2 posts TODAY way before this article was written. Don is right. Number of posts means nothing as long as it's not 0 or in single digits.

The line is 20 posts, "Judgment made mainly on number of posts with the cut off being 20 posts." As far as 4-5 months, the forums have been around for a little over 10 days with my requirement being at 2 posts per day.

Well if that is were true then why is it that the State of New York has 10 posts but isn't "ianctive"? This seems a little biased...

Ehhh... Sorry guys, I was in a hurry this morning and didn't have time to log in. I just got back home and voted no to the new proposal about 30 seconds ago. My apologies to the people of Connecticut.

By the way, I don't see a logical progression here:
New York - Greecelightning (USWP) - 10 Posts - Last Seen Yesterday Afternoon
*Nevada - Sadeh Badeh (USWP...TJC) - 13 Posts - Last Seen Early This Morning*

Great article, gives everyone a good judge of who is active and who isn't. Also 2of3 CVP members are active not just 1 as you have listed.

These forums are new so NO Congressmen has an excuse not to have at least a vote for every vote we have took and that alone would be almost over the 20 required to be listed as active. So the post counts serve the purpose very much as a good gauge.

Illig INC
Nebraska Congressmen

Great job again, GoBucks. I'm glad you didn't include IRC rankings again. 😃

Wow..

Definitely taking this into account. Nothing against my congressman, but definitely time for a new one.

Oklahoma - Nathan Woods (NP) - 1069 Posts - Last Seen This Evening

Medy: You will NOT be catching up to me...😉

I will be running AGAIN for South Dakota. What is sad is that this guy got people to move for him to get elected...and then does nothing.

What a shame...

🙁

SirChaos

So what about Washington state?

Kirkex is active for Missouri! And don't forget it 😉

I am working for Hawaii. I haven't missed a vote yet, and I don't plan to. I was unaware of the requirement to post on the forums and have only today learned of the requirement to post my voting record in the forum thread. Rest assured, I will meet this requirement in the future. Any of my constituants are encouraged to PM me directly with any questions or concerns regarding my record.

🙂

Hows about finding out how often congressmen vote on proposal? And what proposals the congressmen were not present to vote on. Generally speaking high post count is a good thing however it should not be the determining factor whether to vote for or vote against a congressmen.

These lists are messed up. The judgement seems to be made completely subjectively. People seen one hour ago are inactive, while people seen four days ago are active. Also, voting on proposals should be more important than number of posts.

whored myself today, posted 9 times 🙂

Sorry guys, I have been EXTREMELY BUSY.

Yep.

Inactive. I've never even voted on a proposal...

PLEASE. I vote on every single issue the way I said I would during the election. If I think there is a proposal I need to make, I'll make it. I'm a congressman; I vote. My opinion's enough for me, and its what I ran on. I'll leave the arguing to someone else, thanks.

Ion Ion represents my state of Arkansas...he's from Romania...I'm not even sure he speaks English.

Gacu is completely inactive. Rhane in Kentucky for Feb.-Mar.

"Some of us are newer players and haven't had a year to make over 1,000 posts. That's hardly fair to the people who have been around less than 4 or 5 months isn't it?"

For the record, this is the new forum, and we are only counting the post from these new forums. They have been up since 27 Jan, 2009. People have not been using it for a year...not even a month. It's actually been up less time than the congressional term.

Louisiana --- just like in RL --- banned for Life --- Thank you Tyrsis for helping to keep Louisiana GREAT! GEAUX TIGERS!

just goes to show how the AAP kicks ass!

also, I'm technically not a congressman anymore, since I can't make congressman proposals.

This really lights a fire under people, doesn't it?

With Rob Lewis basically winning by default in the previous election for the congress position of Arizona. If the party has me, I will be offering him competition at that spot.