Examining the truth of PEACE lies [WGC]

Day 610, 08:09 • Published in Canada Canada • by Alias Vision
**Editor's note: Please vote and subscribe, show your support of hard working journalists.**

On the 20th of May, a PEACE delegation opened dialogue with the Canadian Congress in the hopes of seeing Canada join the alliance as a member state. Citizens will recall that at that moment ATLANTIS had collapsed and the balance of power appeared to have shifted decidedly towards the PEACE forces.

There was, it must be said, a fair amount of goodwill towards PEACE at this stage and Congress was fairly evenly split between those supporting a jump to our traditional enemies, those in favour of giving ATLANTIS a second chance and those undecided. As we now know, Congress ended up refusing these overtures in no small part because of the weight of public opinion. Although Congress was divided, the population rather loudly proclaimed their displeasure in joining PEACE.

The snub appears in large part to be the justification for present military action against North America.

In the course of the dialogue between the PEACE ambassador and Canada, a few 'truths' emmerged. Today we look at how those truths stack up in the context of what is happening today.

-Statement 1-
On the 20th of May, following a question by Alias Vision on the stance of PEACE towards neutral nations, the response was the following:

"PEACE respects the neutrality of nations, neutrality is a choice that many nations make, and we believe that this option should not be withheld from anyone."

What we see today?
Canada was effectively a neutral nation as was the United States following the collapse of ATLANTIS and the failed FORTIS. The failure of FORTIS can be attributed directly to PEACE agents in the United Kingdom, having swayed their government and convinced them to switch sides. So in fact PEACE has no respect for neutrality, not when contrasted with opportunism.

-Statement 2-
Congressman Leps Dissim asked about world domination and infighting in the PEACE coalition. The reply was:

"We do not ever plan world domination, and our alliance most likely won’t ever fall apart."

What we see today?
World domination can be interpreted many different ways. By attacking North America the PEACE alliance has the opportunity to dominate the world, if not geographically, in terms of natural ressources. If they are successful in destroying the remaining non-PEACE forces aligned against them in North America, they will have complete control over all high oil and diamond regions. It would only be a single step from there to then move to control all high iron regions. De facto, PEACE would dominate the world and for a very long time if the second part of the above statement is true.

-Statement 3-
"The PEACE global community is a Community based on the defense of its allies. PEACE is built to defend it's allies best interests and general well being. PEACE is built on the foundation of military and economic cooperation, as well as a general friendship."

What we see today?
Canada and the United States were not directly threatening any other nation. As a matter of fact Canada, until mere days before the invasion, had been assiduously working in an attempt to secure peace with France. It was thought the negotiations were in good faith but the wheels were already in motion at that time to open the Nova Scotian front. The apparent French openness was a sham to appease the Canadian government while the final touches were implemented on their side.

-Statement 4-
"If you do not join, I say a fond farewell, and we see what happens from there. If you go neutral, we treat you as a neutral nation. if you go to an enemy alliance, we treat you as an enemy."

What we see today?
The gears of war shifted as far back as May 20th. By dissolving ATLANTIS and with FORTIS not being officially ratified, Canada was in fact neutral. PEACE can clearly be seen reneging was they claim was a strong belief that nations can choose neutrality.

Three nation were confirmed as having been approached by PEACE for inclusion; the US, UK and Canada. The UK ended up accepting the offer and we see where they stand today. The US and Canada refused and the evidence speaks for itself.

-Statement 5-
On May 21st Congressman Dabman asked the ambassador about reputation and the feelings of PEACE towards the country.

"PEACE doesn’t have any grudge or evil feeling towards Canada, and is willing to let bygones be bygones."

What we see today?
The media is full of examples of justifications for the aggressive PEACE expansion in Canadian and American territory. Clearly PEACE holds grudges and shapes its international policy on settling of scores, whether real or imagined.

And the final statement of the PEACE delegate...

-Statement 6-
"I assure you Canada is 100% safe from TO."

What we see today?
Repeatedly PEACE has stated that they do not perform political takeover attempts as they only have an anti-takeover squad. The truth however is much darker. The world landscape is littered with victims of political takeovers, the majority at the hands of PEACE or PEACE friendly nations. With this global war, Canada finds itself in a very vulnerable position. We should know very soon if PEACE is as good as it's word and it does not attempt another political takeover come the 25th of July.

Global war.

Does the world really want overlords such as PEACE deciding their fates arbitrarily? Does the world not see that the Hungarian and Indonesian war machine is a capricious beast, a mailed fist in a velvet glove? When principle comes up against opportunity, PEACE has chosen opportunity every time.

Short of the two superpowers finding themselves at odds with each other, the fate of the rest of the world rests in its ability to coalesce and work united. Citizens of the New World, stiffen the spines of your governments and force them to stand up and be counted. The future generations who will be free to make their own choices will thank you!

*The above was an article from a Member Paper of the Writers' Guild of Canada*