Congressional activity a must
Etemenanki
So it’s been a little while since I have posted anything here in the eCanada media for various reasons, first off general busy life stuff like getting married and all that jazz, and two because the media in this game seems to be dying. Some of you no doubt remember a couple months back I posted a couple of articles in which I detailed the post numbers for the various members of congress. Comments on those articles seemed to be in favour of them and I got a general sense of disappointment when I wasn’t able to do the next couple of months from people. So last night not having anything better to do (such lies, ask the wife) I went and counted posts and here I am, 3 hours later.
Because I was on my honeymoon last month at congress elections I was unable to run and as such, I have no closed door congress access, so the post counts are only reflective of OPEN DOOR congress. Some people will claim they posted mainly in closed door congress, but in my experience doing this, most people post equally in open and closed door congress or far more heavily in open door congress, rarely if ever the reverse.
As you can see, it was a fairly active month this time around with some pretty decent numbers by three of the big 5 parties. An average post per member rating of 45.88 should be seen as a statistical average (1,835 posts / 40). MOO and the MDP were both above that number, EPIC just under it, and both the UN and the CPP well below it.
I did do a bit of a dig into exploring something I have wondered about and removed the top poster from each party, which drastically changed the numbers for some of the parties.
As you can see there are some drastic changes to a couple of the parties by the simple removal of one member of the party. For MOO, the removal of just one member (Addy) dropped the parties’ posts/member by an astounding 28.43. Likewise for EPIC the removal of Chochi cost them 16.79, while Jacobi (CPP), Gherk (MDP), and M. Loiselle (UN) each cost their party only approximately 10 points. A new post/member average works out to be approximately 34.74 (1,216/35) with these members removed. I only present this because I have been concerned for quite some time about parties relying to hard on one member in congress to present opinions and not having a full slate of active and capable congressmen.
Now that I have given you the entertainment (admit it, we are all geeks, and to some of us, that was entertainment) I will move onto the pitch. In a couple of days I will be running for congress again in the province of Saskatchewan under the EPIC banner and I would appreciate your vote. I have been in congress a long time and have always been one of the most active and vocal members of the house (just click back a couple articles and see my activity), not shying from expressing my opinion and or concerns on any topic. I strive for transparency and openness and will happily take any questions or PM’s from the public with questions and comments or situations you believe of concern to the government of the day. So on the 25th, I would like you to consider voting for me in Saskatchewan, thanks!
Major etemenanki………hey, I don’t have a cabinet position, no wonder I have free time.
Comments
Just to point out, even without Addy's posts, MOO still has the highest average of posts per congressman. Personally, I think it has to do with MOO's strategy of being a policy party and focusing on quality over quantity.
I think this says something positive about MOO. Add this "good news story" to the "party and member loyalty survey" where MOO showed the highest loyalty ratings, and you get a pretty interesting insight into MOO.
Consider joining the herd!
"focusing on quality over quantity" You do realize you just took a statement about you having quantity, and said you focus on quality first right?
As to the survey results you speak of, in my mind having a 100% loyalty is a bad thing. While it shows the people in a party are perfectly loyal to that party, I see a lot of bad effects of that. It's why I have always had an issue with the MDP who preach that their congressmen will always vote the same way.
sub
and if you want complete this
http://tinyurl.com/6xdyz3o
is an International Poll
Kind Regards KillOthers
"As to the survey results you speak of, in my mind having a 100% loyalty is a bad thing."
Agreed! Without some form of "dissension", there can be no examination or cross-examination of the facts (policies), leaving no room for positive growth.
Good luck Etemenanki!
I'm not sure how to take your quality v quantity comment on my comment. You do realize that this article defines a quality congressman by the quantity of their post count and defines the quality of a party's congressmen by their average post count per member of congress.
The title of your article implies that activity is a sign of quality in a congressman. Maybe I misinterpreted that, but I don't think I did, afterall, your campaign proposal at the end of this article is firmly rooted on your activity in the past:
"in a couple of days I will be running for congress again in the province of Saskatchewan under the EPIC banner and I would appreciate your vote. I have been in congress a long time and have always been one of the most active and vocal members of the house"
I assume that your campaign markets yourself as a quality candidate, worthy of voter's support, because you are an active congressman and you refer to previous post counts for congressmen. Regardless of your posts counts, I consider you a quality congressman and would gladly run you under the MOO banner anytime.
My comment about quality over quantity reflected that having a small number of active congressmen is better than having a large number of inactive congressmen, quality (defined in this article as being active in congress) over quantity (measured by a simple headcount of congressmen).
"Agreed! Without some form of "dissension", there can be no examination or cross-examination of the facts (policies), leaving no room for positive growth."
Ironically, MOO just completed a comprehensive review of its party platform and political policies. This is the second comprehensive review done in its six month existence, including the initial one.
We had a mini-review about two months ago when admin made some significant changes to the game. These reviews are done on the forum. They commence with a thread where the issues are brought up and commented/debated, and then a poll establishes the priority of the party.
I would like to think that this level of member inclusion in setting policy and the collective interest of the membership in concern for the relevance of the party platform DRIVES the party loyalty that was evident in the poll.
MOO is not a dictatorship, like MDP, although there is merit in that model that I don't dismiss out of hand.
MOO is not "everything to everyone", which may have broader appeal but will lead to some cracks in loyalty and identification with the party for certain demographics of the membership. This isn't bad, not in the least, but I think this is why you see some lower loyalty numbers in CPP and EPIC in comparison to MOO and MDP.
MOO is a policy party with transparent and distinctive positions on matters of policy. This scares off those who don't share the point of view and resonates with those that do. This is my explanation for the high loyalty levels.
Thanks for the run-down, Etemenanki, and since Addy has taken care of one topic dear to my heart, I'll have to find something else to talk about...
Gherk was MDP's top poster!? He might have even been top poster overall if not banned from Congress for a short period. ; ) Also, there's been a lot of sniping back and forth this past month so the numbers may be inflated for those partaking in it. I'm ore concerned about the overall productivity of Congress, since it is the entire body voting together that determines what progress our team as a whole is making.
I made a list of all the stuff voted on in ODC as my way of evaluating overall progress vs keeping things under control:
--Forum and IRC Ban - Takashi_Kun (not really Congress’ work…)
--Forum and IRC Ban - Rylde (not really Congress’ work…)
--Amendment - The Canadian Building Construction Reimbursement (is this ever going to happen)
--A favour from Congress for HOPE (never worked)
--The Alliance Representative Act (good stuff – this is where it’s at)
--Supreme Court Appointment - Alexander Rearden (did not meet qorum)
--Supreme Court Appointment - Olafur Knutsson (I added this because it never actually happened, despite a CP nomination)
--Director Appointment - The Canadian Building Construction Re (is this operational even?)
--Pardoning Rolo Tahmassee (solid response)
--Congressional Policy - Domestic Monetary Policy (struck down)
--Military Funding Increase (hell yeah, we got plenty of that)
--Illegal Proposal - Gherk's Punishment - "Straw Poll" (done and done)
--The Canadian Building Construction Reimbursement Act (still on this?)
--Treasury Bond Program - The Future (in the past? I thought)
To me, ARA stands out as the shining light of what Congress made progress with. The rest was business as usual of keeping the ship of state steady and well anchored.
I just copied all the ODC Voting topics and pasted them. There was no 'Impeach Rolo' topic, except for the 'Pardon Rolo' topic. Congress stated clearly it had no intent of pardoning Rolo just to have him function as CP on the forum (as I said, 'solid response')
We'll let the in-game impeachment votes stand as a record on how Congress handled that matter. (two tries is not bad)
"Motion of Impeachment", started June 5th by Pimpdollaz. 119 posts.
"Impeachment of Rolo - Round 2", started June 14th by Pimpdollaz. 34 posts.
There was even a third one started and abandoned when it was discovered another one had already been created.
Ahh, it occurs to me your talking about the voting ones, not just the things discussed in congress. Do you believe that the things discussed in congress are not relevant unless they are voted upon as well in congress?
Definitely relevant but not doable as a cut-and-paste topic-by-topic response. I was simply using a handy list of items approved/not approved by Congress as a method to determine what Congress had been working on. Like tallying up the number of postings, it is an imperfect system, yet all that I could handle given time constraints.
There are a lot of ways to evaluate Congress and sampling a wide spectrum of data/sources would provide the best results. Mine was not meant to be comprehensive - only another small piece of the puzzle.
"It’s an admirable skill I wish I possessed, when used for good."
Poignant statement.
I read ODC daily, and I wasn't impressed by the level of the discussion
All the terms congressmen were bitching each others.
Speaker is inactive since last week.
Quorum wasn't meet in a couple of votes.
Congress needs to wake up!
Still good work etemenanki, I like those stats. : )
Chochi is no more EPIC than I am, he's a DALer true and true. Remove Chochi from your EPIC totals, then move the highest actual EPIC member to find out your true activity rates
Partisan stats are partisan..
Oh, and remove PimpDollaz while your at it, also a DALer...
What do those EPIC stats look like now?
Loyalty I believe is the base of the party. Without loyalty the platform and ideals mean nothing. MOO is loyal and active. Consider voting your local MOO candidate on June 25th.
Etemenanki: ''As to the survey results you speak of, in my mind having a 100% loyalty is a bad thing. While it shows the people in a party are perfectly loyal to that party, I see a lot of bad effects of that. It's why I have always had an issue with the MDP who preach that their congressmen will always vote the same way.''
x2. MOO included.
Our MOO policies are guidelines that we encourage Congressmen to vote along. There is no enforced 'dictat' stating that they must vote along party lines.
True, it's not the open-ended collection of individual values that EPIC models itself on, yet I'm not sure where this 100% label is coming from. That total is sure getting a lot of traction for a poll (kaz's) that never stated the total number of votes for each option.
There will be hell to pay if everyone voted just for the party. I'll have none of this so-called unanimity while I am PP!
I thought I posted more than just 49...
MOO isn't a dictator party. The party doesn't tell us what to do and we have to follow everything said. We have our own minds and opinions. The policies just help us decide which is the best thing to do.
MDP is the second most active Party in congress. Despite our top two posters no longer having congress access (1 by choice, the other by Presidential order) we were still able to maintain a high level of activity this month.
I guess the attacks on the MDP for being no-shows are a thing of the past.
*glares at Etemenanki*
😛😛
*takes down MOO convention poster*
*turns off the light and quietly closes the door*
wow I guess the honeymoon is over
^ Well no eh! I left them in the dark behind closed doors! Unless you mean I should have left the lights on? But you can spring more surprises with the lights off so..
You and your bride have a beautiful long weekend Etemenanki!
Happy St-Jean à tous!!
I like statistickss
R︀a︀t︀e︀ ︀m︀y︀ ︀n︀а︀k︀е︀d︀ ︀p︀h︀o︀t︀o︀s︀ ︀♀︀ ︀.︀ ︀M︀y︀ ︀b︀l︀о︀g︀ https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=%6e%61%6b%65%64%2d%67%69%72%6c%73%2e%6f%6e%6c%69%6e%65%2f%6b%6b%2f%78%6b%44%57%43%39%3f%73%6f%75%72%63%65%3d%65%72%65%70%75%62%6c%69%6b%26%61%64%5f%63%61%6d%70%61%69%67%6e%5f%69%64%3d1805561