Congress Election - Results and discussion
Mickskitz
Hi all,
I'm not much one for writing articles, but I can't think of a better way to procrastinate from studying right now so here I go.
The results are in for the recent congress election
There was a total of 167 votes put forward and they were distributed as follows:
APP (Australian Parliamentary Party) - 43 votes (25.75% of all votes, 104.88% of party size) = 10 Congress seats
ARP (Australian Revolutionary Party) - 38 votes (22.75% of all votes, 79.17% of party size) = 9 Congress seats
KHMC (Knight Hawks Military Council) - 36 votes (21.56% of all votes, 92.31% of party size) = 9 Congress seats, but only 6 congressmen put forward, so 3 waisted seats
APP (Australia Pride Party)- 26 votes (15.57% of total votes, 144.44% of party size) = 6 Congress seats but only 4 left after Multi deletion / party not putting enough candidates forward, so 2 waisted seats. I did not see how many candidates the Pride party put forward leading into the election, so I cannot be sure the reason for their seats not being allocated.
ALF (Australian Liberation Front) - 24 votes (14.37% of total vote, 114.29% of party size) = 6 Congress seats
So all in all, a reasonable turn out for the election, unfortunately marred by party presidents not putting enough candidates forward as well as a party
Now I am mad and disappointed. Firstly I am mad that the KHMC did not put forward more candidates, or offer the 6th place party G&G to have the remaining candidate places. This action cost the eAus economy 15 gold, which is just gone, never to be seen, and to put eAus further behind the other nations.
I am mad at the admins for giving the Australian Pride Party who yesterday had 24 (or maybe 25) members ANY SEATS. If a party creates multi's to get into a position to hold congress seats (top 5 parties), then when the multi's are deleted they should not get to hold on to their spot.
So I wrote a ticket
In relation to the recent congress election in eAustralia, the Australia Pride Party was the 4th largest party with 24 (or 25) members, after cleaning out multi's as part of the election, their membership declined to 18, which puts them in 6th position which means they should not have been eligible for congress seats. I ask that you put any candidates from the Green and Gold party, which was 6th during the election due to the multi's created by the Australia Pride Party, into the seats held by the successful candidates of the Australia Pride Party. Also, it seems odd that their vote count is so high (8 more than their now current member base), due to their non-presence in the forums, ingame articles and the fact that they are widely known as a party for multi's in eAus. It seems like there are probably mutli's that weren't detected by the election bot, or that the votes were not removed for this party given the multi accounts removed.
So I ask that you replace the Australia Pride Party congressmen with candidates under the Green and Gold party who missed out (I am not a member of their party, but feel they were unfairly punished due to lack of multi management by eRep leading up to the election when I know a ticket was submitted from another eAus player warning of the Australia Pride Party probably putting multi's into the party leading up to the election). The fact that the 8 multi's appear to have been banned seems like a fairly weak punishment considering the benefits received by doing the process.
I have only just written this, so haven't received a response yet, but I doubt they will do anything.
I just thought I would write this article to explain the results, and to vent my anger towards the admins for allowing the Pride Party to continue to create multi's without consequence.
EDIT
I have just found out that it appears no multi's have been banned from the Pride Party, they have just relocated to the G&G party, more than likely to sit and wait until the next election where they will return to block G&G from gaining congress seats.
It has been 24 hours, but I still have not received a response from the admins on my ticket
I hope this informs people of what is going on.
Kind Regards
Mickskitz
Comments
First Denied
I was always surprised that the top five parties who can not fill their Senate quota do not appraoch parties outside the top 5 to offer them a senate seat or two...still multi accounts are obviously still flooding eAustralia and I wish you guys all the best dealing with them.
Your parties really have to make sure they elect very active PP's now
I think Admin need to alter the system a bit. Now that we're using party lists instead of first past the post, we should not just have to be able to just vote the top 5 parties.
Good article Mickskitz! Congrats for the Senate members! Don't hesitate much, we have work to do! 😉
Good work Mickskitz
Sub 21
o7
Excellent article Mickskitz!!!.Voted,subed,shouted!!.
Good work. It is a shame that so many potential congress members missed out because of too few candidates.
A great result for APP - this party rocks!
what is the point of seeing "the fairness of the election" if they do not even do anything. what morons
Who wants to take odds on whether game Admin action your ticket at all..?
I doubt they will, Most of the people in the pride party are now in the GnG party.
I got a reply to my ticket saying if anything was wrong they would deal with it.
They didn't find anything wrong as nothing was dealt with.
clear...!!!
status closed 😛
Are we to assume that GnG is under attack ?
politicians statement. find fault when the desire is not achieved
When the desire it to have a country free of multi-senators it really doesn't seem like much of a stretch to find fault.
Politics of envy is the root of split and causes not the development of this eCountry
there is no split opinion aside from that of you and your multi brothers and everyone else. Having to create multis to give yourself influence only proves that you have none
good article but not right to replace parties that weren't elected get admins to block Pride party out for next term. the government wrote plenty of tickets about them some got listened to some not like hitting a bullseye at the office
I do agree in part that perhaps the congress seats shouldn't be awarded as no one voted for the G&G, but the issue with banning the Pride party is it will just cause these multi's to go to another party and PTO (which they could do with most parties as their multi base is between 15 and 2😎, which is even worse than having multi senators.
It's not just the 'Indonesians' cheating. Here is TianaC who bk83 says she knows in real life - http://prntscr.com/2707zi and has been banned for usage of multiple accounts.
The log in dates are virtually identical to bk's sadly.
Well, I did say it was odd that both BK and Tiana 'disappeared' at the same time as Mick...
if that were true wouldn't i be banned also? i haven't been so there goes that.
On the same matter i have asked you to stop harassing me by sending private messages Hugh and i would appreciate it if you stopped.
And I have asked you to provide proof that I was racist as you claim...i would appreciate that as well but we don't always get what we want. And one PM asking why Tiana C was banned does not equal harassment Barbie/Mick
the reason i left Claire isn't a great secret i spoke with the former government about why and it most of it was to prevent being sent intimidating messages day after day by Hugh. i come back and find he's starting it again besides being told to stop. Majester said it best at the time no means no
Hugh, stop sending those pics - none of us want to see that so put it away!
I published the PM's you liar. It was four PM's if memory serves all on the same day. So where this day after day comes from I don't know. Publish the PM's then Bree/TianaC and show me to be a liar...or can't you do that eh?
I still think you are another Mick account or just a lying little immature kid...come to think of it both are the same
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-4th-update-impeach-an-unstable-cp--2333512/1/20 oh and the screenshot of this ''childs'' PM's and accusations are in this article. Care to make other lies up like your groomer Mick Gatto?
Lmfao, oh please darling, do NOT make up lies. You were not sent messages day after day by Hugh, so do not even go there you lying little cow. If you accuse someone of something, at least provide the proof, or in short; STFU.
And in a lot of cases, the main account isn't banned, just the multi's it spawns off. Given yours and "Tiana's" logins were virtually identical, and you claimed to know the person in real life, I absolutely believe it was a multi account of you.
Grow up, stop making ridiculous accusations that you cannot back up.
[removed]
Oh and here we see TianaC (banned for multi accounts) - http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/8130608 and in her newspaper she claims to know bk83 in real life and refers to her as 'Breeana' at the bottom of this article - http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/get-up-and-get-busy-2331927/1/20. This account was also banned for being a multi account - http://www.erepublik.com/en/citizen/profile/7645007 and the name of that account? Brianna Davey with just one friend on their friends list...guess who? bk83.
I rest my case m'lud
TianaC - sounds like a pornstar name.
She wishes she was that hot
Ooooowh,,, there was too many waisted seats !!
Hmm,, may be I must join that party for filling the seat.
ALL HAIL BRENNAN SHIELDS BOW DOWN TO MY GLORY.
Great article, one tiny thing though, you forgot to include the number of seat allocated to the ALF. I'm OCD about continuity. 😛
Thanks for that. All fixed 🙂