Chaos in political Enetherlands
•
by Willem Drees
Dear Edutch,
As you have all seen lately it is quite a choas in the congress of enederland but why actually?
It all start with the following article: The first article
Where Janty f acts as finance minister on his own behalf and not on behalf of the majority of the congress to which he is bound as a minister in the opinion of congress. There for they started a motion of no confidence (MOF).
In the motion did stand four points why they like to remove him from office.
1: Removal of transparency in the finance sheet
2: Lack of recording raw financial data
3: Active trying to undermine procedures in Congress
4: Not open for feedback of the community
But is anything of these points true, or is a party trying to free the state from a certain measure of stability?
We will check this together and come to a conclusion for each point.
1: Removal of transparency in the finance sheet: If we take a look at the financial table Financial stats of ENL we see that after day 4161 it is no longer recorded how much is left in the state treasury. The congress therefore has a point in this. which indeed must be clarified by the minister. I do see that he is now adjusting this, which means that the minister wants to change and give the public an insight into the finances.
2: Lack of recording raw financial data:
As I mentioned earlier in point one, it is true that it is not clear from the current information that nothing has been entered on the current sheet. Perhaps the minister has a different sheet where he writes it down, but if both the congress and the population cannot see this, this causes tension.
3: Active trying to undermine procedures in Congress
in my opinion this is not the case, but it is true that he sees an attack on his position as minister rather as an attack on himself and this is something that the minister should look at to ensure that there is a good and reliable link remains between the congress and the minister.
4: Not open for feedback of the community.
if we look at the reaction and then also the action he takes that it is not the case and that he is indeed open to feedback.
In my opinion, it is true that motion of no confidence is not valid, but it is negative that there is a response from the government to make it more difficult to start a motion of noconfidence.
to come back to the question of what we started with. Is there anything at all true or is a party destroying the stability of our country? The answer to this question is that there were some points that were right where the minister is now acting to improve. But is there a party busy destroying the stability of the country? not in my eyes it is only an observant party who wanted to give the minister a warning in a not too clever way.
I hope this article clarifies the situation!
With my big Dutch greeting,
koning der zeeuwe
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I'd like to add that it's not usual for data to be inputted into the Sheet every single day. Call it laziness or efficiency, it is far more pragmatic to i.e. calculate everything every week (when for example payment are to be received by TW Partners / Concession Deals) in regards to 'raw data'. This made sense before - when 7 days could be backtracked in eRepublik itself - and even more now with extensive economic data of several weeks available at all times in eRepublik.
[removed]
To many typo's so deleted the one above...
As NoTie already stated it was common practice to record data once a week or so. Nowadays you can do it even less often thx to changed game mechanics.
As stated on other occasions as well: It might be wise to make sure if the point you make are true before writing an article that does not do justice to the truth and might even harm us. Or create a situation where people won't take you're articles serious any-more.
weekstrom this article was only meant to inform about the status and to highlight the point where it comes from. This article did not have a political agenda or the purpose of putting janty in a bad image.
Possible, yet the way you described 1 and 2 suggest something was wrong as it was not recorded over the past 2 days. There is nothing wrong about that. Also you stated MoF has now recorded it as if that's the result of the MonC which will have no relationship at all. Again suggesting something was wrong.