Bulgaria vs Serbia who's at fault?
•
by nem01able
Alot of citizens in the eWorld are happy Bulgaria and Serbia have this new conflict. Why? This game was getting boring and it needed a plot twist
This article will explain the situation in the most unbiased way and will probably insult both sides but idgaf
Who started this conflict?
Bulgaria because they allowed USA to join their alliance. However Serbs are acting like drama queens for actually taking this as an attack on Serbia and TWO. In the past a lot of TWO members even had an MPP with USA and Serbs barely voiced their opinion so its either the conflict between Serbia and USA greatly escalated after CTRL, it always existed but Serbs were quiet about it for their allies sake or Serbs are being drama queens. This is a matter of opinion so I will move on to something else.
Bulgaria's logic when it comes to keeping their relations with TWO friendly is greatly flawed. If they really wanted to stay friendly with TWO then why would they allow their MU's to fight for Russia against Poland. Technically Bulgaria's government didn't give the green light for their MU's to support Russia but their response to the war gave the impression that they didn't care. However it's understandable why the MU's choose to fight for Russia because they are "brothers" so Poland should of expected this from Bulgaria, nevertheless the Bulgarian government should sucked up their pride and gave some sort of apology to Poland to keep their relations friendly.
Both sides are at fault at this issue.
Why did Bulgaria allow USA to join CoT?
Bulgaria wanted USA's DMG to go to CoTWO rather than EDEN which makes sense but they knew Serbia would disapprove of their decision so Bulgaria basically traded their relationship with TWO for more dmg done to their alliance.
Herp derp CoT is a brotherhood. No after playing this game for over 3 years I as well as a lot of other older players have come to the conclusion there's no such thing as brotherhood in this game. E.g. Poland-Croatia, Serbia-Brazil, Romania-Croatia etc. Neither CoT, EDEN or TWO is a brotherhood
Everyone's at fault, if you read an article blaming one particular side then its probably a troll/propaganda article. Lets embrace the new war underway and just remember this is a game and not to bring RL into it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJTBPdVpdMc
pomozi mene i shout
Bulgaria vs Serbia
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/bulgaria-vs-serbia-who-s-at-fault--2252559/1/20
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I'm off for like 2 weeks, by the time I come back this article better have at least 10 votes
Your logic is extremely fragile...
When you founded CTRL it was OK to get the USA in. Nowadays it's not OK for the USA to be in CoT....
You chose side, that is your right. Don't expect us to like your actions. And don't blame your actions on us, or the USA......
You didn't read the article did you....
Yes I did...But starting with Bulgaria is to blame is biased 🙂
Because quite many will skip the rest.... 🙂
Regardless of the reason for this breakout, I always had great respect for Bulgarian players.
Bulgarians as allies, or as opponents - I salute you! o7
"and will probably insult both sides"
Seems you called it right at the start. 🙂
Best Part -
Everyone's at fault, if you read an article blaming one particular side then its probably a troll/propaganda article. Lets embrace the new war underway and just remember this is a game and not to bring RL into it
well, probably the best neutral POV I saw about this issue. You got point in all possible conclusions.
Well the whole point of CTRL was basically to get the USA in the new ONE like alliance, with Serbia included, that's why Serbia had no objections. But, USA wanted it to fight against Serbia, thats why it failed.
Bulgaria took USA in CoT because it wants CoT to be stronger and they don't give a shit about Serbia's enemies.
On the other hand, Serbia could have ignored it, but Serbia used it to pick Romania over Bulgaria and to start a new chapter in international relationships.
I don't think there's coming back now that the new leader of CoT (America will be it soon, it's strongest by far) is Serbias mortal enemy.
Things will never be the same, but it will be fun.
Good article, both sides are guilty and both sided wanted this, Bulgaria just provoked the inevitable conflict.
As if Serbia cared about Bulgaria's interests. 🙂
The NAP's with Romania and sending Romania to attack us and Macedonia, already at war with half of EDEN precede the acceptance of USA in CoT. : )
My comment above was brief, as the first Bulgarian to reply was p funny. 😁
But the bigger point here is that this is the best honest assessment I have seen of the situation.
Good article. 😁
This article will explain the situation in the most unbiased way
You did lose me here - _ -
"there's no such thing as brotherhood in this game."
This.
Doesn't matter much who is at fault what matters tho is that Serbia started fighting against us literally overnight. Well done. 🙂
there's no such thing as brotherhood in this game.
now when you said it... funny cause it's true.
The point is to kill (e)Serbs. That's it.
✈ ▌▌
i really like your words. 😃
well what's your opinion about Romania in this issue?
Once EDEN is disembelled they along with Greece will join TWO and be equals but right now they are just a political pawn used to encourage the rest of EDEN to leave the alliance
Thanks for your reply 😃
Romania signed mpp with Serbia and Poland and have a war with Bulgaria.
it seems that romania is the core of the conflict between Serbia and Bulgaria right now.
Can i regard romania as a pawn which is used to level up the contradiction between Serbia and Bulgaria,or CoT and TWO?
moreover, becase of Romania, there are some angry voices from Hungary. will Romania create new problems inside of TWO?
Hungry gave the Green light for Romania to MPP with Serbia and Poland, thier situation is more like the Turkey-Greece rather than Bulgaria-Turkey. What happens next depends on who has a louder voice within Hungary.
Romania is at the core of the conflict and right now it's a grude match between TWO and CoT, it's not about keeping Romania safe, its more like teaching Bulgaria a lession and there's no garantee Romania will join TWO so i guess they arent really a pawn just a temporary ally (yes i contradicted myself)
its more like teaching Bulgaria a lession
____
hahahahaha, that's what eden has been doing for the last 1 year, take a look where they are now. if you want to go that way, be my guest, but you should know better : D
Also keep deluding yourself that Romania is just something temporary and it's some revenge on BG or some other bullshit like that , you wanted to put Romania into 2 but unfortunately 2 countries vetoed it. 😃
> Who started this conflict?
> Bulgaria because they allowed USA to join their alliance
LOL. keep calm
Summary of the article:
TWO have strong butthurt because CoT did not want be their puppets
CoT is team equal members - congresses of all 15 members decide hwo can be accepted firsth for trial member and after months again they vote for full member ...
oH Noooo....Why Bulgaria agaaaain ??? ; D
pff we all know how alliances work, theres usually 3 or so with the most influence and the rest just nod their heads ;P
leave the puppetmaster theory for the edenites...if some countries are unhappy with the politics they can stop new member or leave the alians...we see this story many times here....i dont think Hungary ans Spain are sountries under serbian ot polish mind control too, after weeks months they can join us...
Tbh Bulgaria is to blame here, saying both sides are to blame when it isnt true is just stupid
Bulgaria knew very well that USA shouldnt be allowed in CoT and they still choose that nation, sometimes i wonder if they did it out of spite towards TWO just to show they are "big boys" now.