ATLANTIS or PEACE
Modelcon
I 'm writing this article mainly to foster discussion and comments. I do not profess to knowing everything about the pro's and con's about joining either side, and I think that we really need to make up our minds soon.
There has been lots of discussion generated about choosing ATLANTIS or PEACE, but I haven't yet seen a good article on this (I may be wrong)
Just so everyone knows, here are the countries of ATLANTIS:
* Argentina
* Canada
* Norway
* Romania
* Spain
* Sweden
* UK
* USA
And PEACE:
* Greece
* Pakistan
* Bulgaria
* Portugal
* Brazil
* Italy
* Austria
* Indonesia
* Hungary
* Venezuela
* Japan
* Iran
* France
* Netherlands
* Turkey
* Mexico
I'll let you know my view now. I'd rather we join ATLANTIS. Judging solely on the performance of ATLANTIS in the recent wars, particularly against eFrance, ATLANTIS has been carving it up. That's not to say that eFrance has been completely helpless, as they have largely reversed their losses by now.
If you don't know, I like to read about the statistics of various countries. Just by going to the country ranking page, one can see that almost every member of ATLANTIS is in the top 10, with Canada and Argentina following not too far behind, at 13 and 14 respectively. These countries make the top 15 for a reason, because they've got active members and good leadership. That's not to say that this is something PEACE lacks, but the top three countries of eRepublik, eSpain, eUSA and eRomania are in ATLANTIS.
In the end, I'll let powers higher than me decide. Of course, whichever side we don't join will likely invade us, and without a hospital or a defense system, I doubt we'll last long. I personally fear PEACE far more than ATLANTIS. In consideration of this, we must guarantee support of the side we join before we join it. Here's where Balash's donations can come in. If we commit gold and money to various Presidents of PEACE or ATLANTIS, we may ensure that we're not totally destroyed.
Comments
Vote this up!
voted! I would rather not join any of them so we keep neutral and can commerce with all nations making sure we bring as much gold as possible to china.
Neutral. We are only a liability to both alliances and should focus on exporting to whoever benefits us the most.
peace..
join with peace...
cause look now peace is the best...
win all the war n solid..
u said ATLANTIS...
then i'll say PEACE...
why??
have u see that they are very solid and coordinated???
have u see that the biggest country in erepublik hav no strength in conquering france region??
they even can't conquer 1 region...
what a shame...
Peace i think
If you see all the reason atlantis charge France...
All the reason is bullsh**t, they made it
Look all the articles at France or Usa
U'll know which one tell the truth
I would like to say that we can try to be neutral. I think the idea being neutral, as manflon and Billy Fleming suggested, is more profitable.
But IF we had to choose ATLANTIS or PEACE, I'll prefer PEACE. Although many of their members are low-leveled countries, I think they are very solid in their alliance. 🙂
(hey.. Iran's a PEACE member too.. just realized it by now.. 😑)
We should go for PEACE- PEACE is an alliance with more members and more small states. We would fit in much better in PEACE than in ATLANTIS as the article stated, we would be a powerless country between members of the top 15.
If we join either we will pay great sacrifices.
While neutrality let's us do whatever we want and trade with whoever we want and makes us the most profitable and we have no enemies.
PEACE very solid although less in quantity
you can saw war France vs USA,,
i think if there war, Peace always win its fact
PEACE! 🙂
I think that youll should be neutral
I think that youll should be neutral
PEACE !!
i think we should be neutral for a while..
en focus to reestablished our economy.
Peace plz !