Another brick in the wall
Sebulba
Prior to his election speech, ad-homonym attacks and lies about other parties had not been seen for months, but he so gracefully chose to toss the glove. He wanted war - and war he received.
clickable image
caught of guard
Binary Party were caught with their guard down. They thought the TT of yesteryear was far gone, and a new, improved and sensible Party were emerged out of the dust settling after eNorway merged with Finland. How wrong we were.
It was presented to the citizens, from Stassis newly sharpened pen, that Cirno was not good enough. Apparently, he had neglected his responsibilities as president, and one were under the impression he was a cough away from being impeached. The president of eNorway at the time, was disgusted by these accusations, and tried to defend himself as politely he could. It was later on presented that what was written in the article, was not meant as a personal attack, however, the damage was already done.
clickable image
sad day for eNorway
The article held ground, and stands there still today, manifesting the day TT declared war against their opponent - for what? Personal glory and satisfaction? Mind you, before this day, cooperation between Binary Party and Teknokratene had been fine, and the politicians on both sides respected each other. But on this sad day, Teknokratene revealed their true self. They ran their president election on pretty much the same issues as Binary Party had the month before, and most of them only said "Continue to..."
The exceptions were few, but seemingly quite tactically done. It just happened to be the two issues both Demokratene and Kapitalist Partiet had fronted the week before - one each - and it just happened to be that both of the parties failed to present a President candidate, most likely to the new rules for running a President candidate. Not surprisingly, TT's president received a lot of votes, and went ahead and won the election. I can only imagine the disappointment from Demokratene and Kapitalist Partiet, when they find themselves without a congress forum open to write in for the average citizen, nor have public voting system been much of an issue.
clickable image
turning the tables
All attempts from Binary Party to defend from the countless attacks from TT, has been turned around. It has been claimed that this was not a defensive action, but a hostile attack, making TT appear as the victim in this process. However, there were still being produced article after article, ridiculing Binary Party in an offensive manner - but still, right in the open, claiming to be the victim, and only trying to defend themselves from Binary Party’s ... well - responses. Even old Teknokrats awoke from the dead, to take part in this campaign to make the, now biggest party of eNorway, to look bad.
Factual errors were made out to be the truth it wasn't, and the President of TT even went as far as drawing a ridiculing cartoon on the expense of Binary Party. All of this was still being presented as an attempt to defend their innocence, even if he in 1.493 words had gone on and on with insult after insult towards the Binary Party.
Questions about the government were met with anger and accusations. 14 days after the president elections, there was a question about how things were looking in regards to the minister of Finance. The answer was not as polite one might have though, rather a hostile one (and I quote);
"It has become apparent that the hostile sentiment Binary Party is brewing against my party must be met with greater force since BP has coordinated a smear campaign to derail Teknokratene's operations."
clickable image
despicable tactics
As mentioned before, the president of TT presented a 1.493 word long insult towards the Binary Party, before he just at the end, made a plea to cooperate in the upcoming President election. There is a possible threat in the form of a Political takeover Political Takeover. By doing things this way, they produced themselves a great opportunity to blame the Binary Party if the negotiations stranded, pointing back at this article.
Before this sickening article was presented, Binary Party had internally nominated, proposed and discussed who the best man for the upcoming election would be, and Eha Pappkriger was sought to be the best candidate available in the party. And to no surprise, when Eha was revealed as our candidate, the response from TT was basically;
We will not support Eha Pappkriger as President.
clickable image
They also demanded a contract, stating that in a similar situation in the future, TT would get the president by default. So much for democracy. Of the two parties, Binary Party is the biggest one, and by far the most active party, with the most active players. This is quite well represented in congress as well. Still, TT has the nerve to dictate that we can't run Eha as president, and they want a free president period somewhere down the line. All of this from the very same Party, that during the last congressional election wanted to bring in EDEN to hand out votes, resulting in pushing at least one of the Binary Party candidates out of the list, in favour of one of their own. So to witness TT pointing the finger at Binary Party is quite frankly a bit strange.
the hypocrisy
Over two articles, an old TT giant returns from hibernate, pointing fingers, and asking if we all can't be friends, luring out a few insults on his way as well, in various comments scattered all over.
clickable image
This is all very fine and dandy, however, last night the Party President of Teknokratene produces yet another campaign against the biggest and most active political party, loosely based on his vivid imagination and perception of facts - blaming it all on the Binary Party. This is yet another pitiful attempt to turn the Norwegian citizens against us, claiming to be the innocent victims in a dirty campaign they started themselves, and are trying to end by turning people against the Binary Party. Enough already! Get off our backs! Stop the lying! Stop the deceptions. Stop rewriting history! Stop chasing your own glory, dragging eNorway down the drain with it...
The question now is; was it worth it? Was getting Eris elected worth the can of worms you opened? Was it worth jeopardizing national security, friendship, cooperation and a good experience living in eNorway? Are you happy, now that you can spew your hateful articles, disguising it as defensive actions?
I hope citizens of Norway who have been deceived, will be able to see what this party and the poisonous novelists of theirs really are...
[img]http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx143/esebulba/Vote_Eha.jpg?t=1262582277[/img]
Want to have a chat with us in the Binary Party?
We are very present on mIRC, and most of us can be reached by clicking here
Do you have any thoughts or questions you'd like to ask?
Just let us know
The article is written from my perception of things, and may divert slightly from others perception of reality.
Comments
lol, you're so bitter.
Only almost as pretty as the true eNorwegian president 😉
Aww Evleos, du er så søt! I bet my mouth is dirtier, too 😛
gj Sebulba!
Oh yeah, I can see how much you want to settle peace between our parties. Remember when Stassi wrote his article that tried to clear the TeK name, and you thought of it as mindless bull that only had the purpose of smearing BP?
You are doing the EXACT same thing here. Hypocritical of you.
I guess TT and Stassi have monopoly on writing those articles, huh? You brave, brave soldier, hiding behind an org... This is my response to the many, many articles he has written. I didn't see you attack him when he wrote his delirium. Oh, that's right - he is the one true voice in eNorway. All hail Stassi and his poison pen - all others - sod off! Right? Have I got it right? Hypocritical of you.
Great
Citation needed.
You didn't need it for your articles, so I figured it doesn't matter anymore.
I used plenty of citations in my Partisan Self-Interest article. Did you read it? This is not a very effective counter-argument to my last two articles since the last one is satire (and STILL describes what actually happened with the exception of the laser beams firing on Russia statement), and the one before that accurately depicted the order of events that transpired and proves you are in the wrong, using citations, which you countered with none. BP accuses me of rewriting history when all I need to do is link to the source.
No, you didn't cite everything. And the things you cited, didn't prove a single thing. You linked the article you were talking about, gave it your own meaning and conclusion, yet still, the article and comments stated differently. It's on the verge of fraud, if you ask me. You can't toss out a random link, claiming to cite stuff. Yes, you link the source, but it doesn't change the fact that the things you write, is not accurate.
And writing satire you claim to be the truth, enables you to not use citations? Nice to know. It's quite handy to know what game rules you play with - they seem to change with every article you post.
"the last one is satire (and STILL describes what actually happened" -Andreas Stassivik, 04/01-09, at 08:34pm GMT+1
Here you say you portray the truth - yet, you take the liberty of writing whatever you please, without citing stuff. I rest my case.
"All hail Stassi and his poison pen - all others - sod off! Right? Have I got it right? Hypocritical of you."
Oh, I advised him not to be so harsh. I sure did. I still liked his article because it had loads of actual links with actual references. Sure, it was hypocritical of him to first write the long message and then ask for co-operation, but it's really childish to go "he did it first, so I can do it too". If you want this to end, you should ignore it. I know the feeling, believe me, it was SO hard to write the long article all the while being careful with what I said.
I'm not calling you dumb or stupid, I see why you feel this is justified, but all the same it's obvious you don't care about peace between the parties when writing articles like this. And don't say this is the only way to get the truth out, just look at my article and you'll see that I managed to keep any smearing out of it, all the while clarifying the case for any readers.
~KristofferAG
Hey KristofferAG.
First of all, thanks for letting me know who is commenting. Kudos to you. And also I want to thank you for a very good reply, you're starting to come of as the bigger man 🙂
I see where you're coming from, and your point is valid. However, I'm pretty sure you can see things from our perspective as well. You are a smart man, and I don't feel people should get away with anything. Sure, I can be the bigger man, and I have tried to be so for most of the last man, but at one point, you cannot hold things in. When the bar keeps raising, I try to keep up.
Anyway, unless the bar is raised another level, I will personally do my outmost to keep things civilized - from my part, anyway. But if one of the parties continue with the cheap shots, I doubt the other party will bite their tongue in silence, and the bad circle will continue.
Have a nice evening, Kristoffer, and may the best suited candidate win tomorrow...
time will tell, who knows, something terrible might happen if all goes wrong tomorrow.
And yes, I do see your point of view, and that's exactly what led TeK and Stassi to write those articles.
Good night, I wish you and your party good luck tomorrow, and may the best politician win!
Those are some might fine shoops, if I may say. Even though the harry potter one really gives me the goosebumps.
~KristofferAG
"And to no surprise, when Eha was revealed as our candidate, the response from TT was basically; We will not support Eha Pappkriger as President."
thanks for removing the quotes, but it's still a disgusting lie. TeK has every right to vote for whoever they want. and unlike BP, I wouldn't spend the entire month boycotting a government I don't support. If Eha were democratically elected and requested my help, I would gladly and repectfully work for a BP government, despite my dislike for any of its members.
Jeg gidder faktisk ikke engasjere meg i den pågående "krigen" mellom partiene, så orker ikke ha enda en runde kommentarer på samme innholdet som blir skrevet om igjen av begge parter. Den ene tingen jeg biter meg merke til, tho, er hvordan du gang på gang nevner at "Teknokratene fra et år siden er tilbake", med alle "skitne triks, angrep på demokratiet" osv osv (jeg vet dette ikke er nøyaktige sitat, men du vet hva du selv har sagt). En ting jeg da lurer på er: Hva snakker du om her? Hva var det TeK gjorde for et år siden som var så forferdelig? Når gikk TeK i det hele tatt til angrep på BP i 2008/09? Hvilke skitne triks? Hvilken "tapte respekt" fra denne tiden er det snakk om? Kanskje din forklaring på hva vi gjorde som var så jævlig da kan hjelpe både meg og andre til å skjønne hvorfor TeK er badguys nå mot uskyldige BP?
The problem here, stassi, is that you've based this entirely on a oneliner from me, which clearly is ironic. It seems to be the only thing you attack me on.