An appeal to Americans: eNOVA
Ananias
Several months ago, I began to consider creating an organization for the express purpose of uniting eUS citizens as a team to work on the support of new citizens, unifying our population toward specific goals, developing a method by which citizens could earn additional funds, and working to restore or protect sovereignty for occupied and new nations.
I named it eNOVA , and four weeks ago I began building the organization on the premise that, certainly, the eUS would not reject our efforts. eNOVA is a humanitarian organization focused on the needs of it’s member nations, with our original charter member as the eUnited States if America.
I have often received the accusation that, while marginally inspirational, my writing has often been more philosophical as it relates to teamwork rather than practical. eNOVA is my answer to those accusations. eNOVA is an organized, self-funded team, a rallying point for unified effort, and a support system for players.
I readily recognize that there are many that scoff at the idea that anyone in a game would ever do something purely to help other citizens and build a team to accomplish some positive things for the eUS motivated only by a commitment to the eRepublik community. And though I will admit to the fact that I would love to see some of the gold that I invested reimbursed at some time, the reality remains that the effort was meant to make the game more enjoyable for players by offering the opportunity to be part of a team making a difference. I am a Project Manager in RL and the idea of organizing the efforts on the basis of projects was a natural feature for anything that I built.
Most of you know my character and have dealt with me before, my hope is that, if nothing else, you are aware that I have always acted with integrity and that I am worthy of your trust. Those are characteristics that are sometimes rare in a fictional world, but it is how I live my RL and it is how I play the game.
When President Emerick was elected President, I approached him with the same level of respect that I have exhibited to all national leaders in-game. A respect that, in my opinion, is commensurate with the fact that a majority of my fellow citizens voted for him. At that time eNOVA was already formed and had publically identified areas that we could support the eUS. It cost the eUS government nothing for its establishment, and our internal compensation program required nothing of the government for maintenance…we were simply looking for innovative and productive means to support the eUS and our other member nations as they came on board.
Imagine my shock when, in the midst of a war that would lead most to believe that any trustworthy help and support would be welcomed, President Emerick categorically refused any assistance that we offered.
We offered to actively seek out and support new citizens of the eUS to leash level 6 through our Futures Program with overt support of the eUS Government and eUS Military.
The President rejected it, he did not want our help.
We offered to pick up both the expense and the responsibilities of the Welcoming Committee in support of the eUS Government.
The President rejected it, he did not want our help.
We offered to recruit and train mentors for eUS citizens and to develop a comprehensive program including vocational training, advanced education and mentor compensation.
The President rejected it, he did not want our help.
The list goes on…but President Emerick has rejected eNOVA.
Perhaps the saddest chapter in the eUS Governments reception of eNOVA came when we had planned to liberate critical regions at our own expense. The plans were developed and required nothing of the eUS Government. We were locked and loaded for a contribution to eUS sovereignty, expecting that any treaty developed by the eUS with PEACE GC would certainly preclude fines for successful RWs by private organizations with no government affiliation. Thus we knew that there would likely be no eUS Government support.
And then we saw the treaty offered which required that, even in an instance in which no eUS Government support was provided, any successful RW would cost the American taxpayers. Therefore, what previously had been a win-win situation for the eUS, became instead a burden to the eUS by forcing us to pay for that which was done through private means and without any assistance from the eUS Government.
Let me make two things clear, eNOVA was inspired by the desire to support all of its member nations, but was originally built to support its charter member nation, the eUnited States; and regardless of President Emerick’s rejection of eNOVA, we will not abandon the eUS citizenry.
This development, President Emerick’s rejection of eNOVA, brings up several very perplexing questions, one of which is:
Why, if there is no required expense to the government, and the charter and foundational intent of eNOVA is to support eUS citizens in a manner consistent with respect and cooperation with the eUS Government, is President Emerick so consistently reticent to allow us to contribute our efforts?
In representing eNOVA in our discussions, I have consistently acted with the highest level of respect and courtesy toward President Emerick and Congress in my attempt to receive authorization from the eUS Government to operate our organization as it is designed to operate for the citizens of our member nations, and our efforts have been consistently rebuked by the administration; and this, at a time, when we all need to be supporting each other.
So, this is my appeal to my fellow citizens: Ask that President Emerick relent from his decision to handicap eNOVA’s efforts to help the eUS.
In conclusion, eNOVA has experienced fantastic growth over the last several weeks, which means that we are going to continue serving our member nations and prospective member nations with excellence and effectiveness. There is a growing sentiment among many of our members that our focus and resources should be targeted to nations that welcome the assistance, rather than reject it. My hope is that President Emerick does, in fact, relent so that we may serve the nation which started it all, but then that is up to the eUS citizenry to decide.
America, if you want our contributions, we are willing to give it freely, but we will not usurp the authority of the President of the eUnited States by continuing to contribute when he has specifically asked us to go away. At eNOVA, we do not question the President’s right to make whatever decisions he chooses for the nation, we simply request to be accepted as partners and contributors to our member nation's, most specifically the eUnited States', success.
Respectfully,
Ananias – Founder of eNOVA
Comments
Good luck Ananias! Carry on!
I hope you and eNOVA persevere, Ananias. Your contributions to the US are immeasurable.
This article is disingenuous. I am a proud member of eNOVA and of the President's staff and I resent this characterization of the President as someone unwilling to help his citizens or work with NGOs. You said openly that eNOVA did not need support from the federal govt, that its programs were independent, and that you are in the game of helping people for the sake of helping them. President Emerick declining to turn over entire functions of the federal government to an unelected private company is hardly a rejection of the priniciples of humanitarianism. If you can't work side-by-side with the established government, then I don't see how you are independent. I am shocked to see that Ananias views eNOVA as a shadow government, one that DESERVES access and control over government programs, and I see this as a shameful push for a run for the Presidency. I am very disappointed.
Good job.
Face it: He's a bad president.
eAmerica should not have to put up with what he's doing. God Bless the brave senators who voted YES on the impeachment.
God Bless you Chris Stanwick. America needs people like you. I hope after your marriage in Ireland you will return to this great land.
I made a video to help recruit people the eRepublik who dont like the idea of texty-games. It's a lil action packed filled with war scenes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUby86uvqOg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUby86uvq[..]uvqOg
came to expect nothing less from Ananias great garticle and totally agreed. I dont understand how the eUS government wont accept us when they have nothing to lose
Chris, please stay in Ireland.
Thank you for the great article, Ananias. I hope it's well read and considered.
Let's keep in mind, Ananias, that elected officials are naturally suspicious of organizations outside of their control. I certainly support and share your ideas and mission but we're approaching them from different angles. Anytime public funds are used elected officials MUST BE DILIGENT.
PigInZen. . . . eNova is self funded, so the "public fund argument" goes out the window.
Nowhere here is written that Ananias thinks of eNOVA as a shadow government, that deserves access and control over government programs. Just because you have formed an personal opinion, don't represent those views as the views of Ananias or eNOVA. If the gov't doesn't want help with that which we have volunteered, maybe they could tell us where we are needed. You all know the most likely answer: "We don't need you." And to that I say, "Look at the state of the eUS, and think again."
"We offered to pick up both the expense and the responsibilities of the Welcoming Committee in support of the eUS Government.
The President rejected it, he did not want our help."
The Welcoming Committee is a funded public program. Ananias writes that eNOVA offered to pay for and take over its responsibilities. A noble action if this is all there was, but the fact is we HAVE a Welcoming Committee and its not untoward that Emerick would like to keep it within the government. eNOVA's Futures Program is excellent, but it is under the control of unelected private citizens and cannot replace an existing government program, even if its goals are similar.
You're right that Ananias hasn't made an overt claim that eNOVA is the rightful government of the eUSA, but he does characterize the current administration as being in effective and proposes eNOVA and its programs as valid replacements where valid. I disagree with this. He also wrote a long address AS PRESIDENT in a hypothetical situation just yesterday (two days ago?). I don't think my analysis is so far off.
The eUSA does need eNOVA, but it cannot replace our existing infrastructure. Emerick is our elected President.
(I do agree w/Ananias about the treaty binding the US govt to the actions of NGOs and citizens, that is ridiculous and Congress should open their eyes and read a treaty before signing it.)
Emerick is a socialist warmonger
@ Exillious: *sigh* Yes Emerick is a bad President and Chris Stanwick is an awesome person. You were obviously not around when Emerick asked people to think hard about the choices confronting us. You were also not around when Stanwick leaked a copy of another treaty. One that was much worse and he said he supported. Now he is against it and called emerick a traitor for impeaching. Get to know people read it helps a lot.
@Ananias: Honestly I'm a little disappointed man. You one know that if you honestly had any true problems with the administration you could have come to me and I would have helped. You also know that public articles that level blame on specific people or groups never help and only hurt, you taught me that. Also I recently posted asking for help with a baby boom project on the eNova forums. There was one suggestion posted, a number of troll like replies and one person who volunteered. Its a two way street brother. Good luck with your continued project.
-Gaius
Thank you for addressing my comments. My main discomfort with this article is its attack on our President and its connection with what I understood as a non-partisan org aligned with the government of the United States. Posting long tirades against our sitting President, regardless of his policies toward eNOVA's activities, is crossing the line into political activity, something I thought eNOVA would not participate in. There are much more civil ways to bring disagreements with the government to light than to write articles which frame an argument as us-vs-them, eNOVA-vs-Emerick. THAT is divisive, something we hardly need.
I am not new to this game, so the "noob" tactic does not work on me. My original toon is from early 2008. He died while I was serving overseas.
Dont say I was "not around" unless you know 100% that I was not around.
@Gaius - I did come to you in various PMs and received no reply. I spoke directly with the President on IRC and he confirmed that he was uncomfortable with us contributing. The Baby-boom assistance post received several replies, and it is an effort we would like to assist with but the President has asked us to desist from projects where we would be approaching new citizens if there is any manner of support in the way of guidance. So, in essence we can recruit, but we cannot help them once they get here as eNOVA.
@sydiot - I did not attack the President. I am stating a fact, we offered to do what we our organization is designed to do and he rejected it. I did not state that he was wrong in his decision, I simply asked that he would relent from that decision and allow us to press forward with our projects under the supervision of the eUS Government as was orginally offered. I am appealing to the beneficiaries of our efforts to ask the president to allow the benefits of our participation and contributions in the eUS.
I wasn't pulling noob card, I was saying you must not have been reading articles at all for when Emerick gave intelligent opinions and Stanwick screamed surrender then flip flopped back when it was advantageous. But if being uninformed is cool then go right ahead.
It would look like you're the uninformed one here. Your knowledge and experience is from a time when America is in a state of epic fail.
I came back to put things back together the way they were in my day.
@Ananias - So appeal to them. An inflammatory article in your newspaper is for public viewing and is not going to bring people together. For example, I didn't know Emerick was against the Futures program in principle. If I'd have known that I would have registered my disagreement with my direct superior and done my best to change the government's policy. But in the end, Emerick can do nothing to stop you outside of posting mean newspaper articles and denying you access to govt funds, so I don't see the need for any of this. I really hope this doesn't become a normal activity for eNOVA, regardless of who is in the Oval Office.
Hey Ananias, instead of making an inflammatory article filled with lies, why wouldn't you try talking to me?
As I explained to your friend Dimension, I asked eNOVA not to try to supersede the US's expanded mentor program, which I felt that it would. The US was making a new, more aggressive mentor program for US citizens to connect with the government. I invited anyone who happens to be in eNOVA to apply to be a mentor for the US. I don't know why you wouldn't do that if you really want to help out so much.
Dimension asked how eNOVA could help the US, and I gave him several ways how he could. a big one was starting a business for skill 0's. I know some one who spends hours every day hiring and firing noobs to stay at maximum productivity while still hiring HUNDREDS of people every day. I'm sure that a group as dedicated as eNOVA could do the same work that one man does.
So Ananias, take your propaganda and shove it. I didn't reject eNOVA, you rejected me.
lolEmerick
You wanted to push your crap off onto us and we wouldn't do it. Now your butthurt and are calling people liars to cover your own ass. Grow up and except responsibility for what you did. You haven't given us a dime, but you want us to start expensive businesses that will make us no money so you don't have to. We have a mentor program in place that you could utilize, but instead you want to do it yourself for political points. I've been an American for my entire life in this game and an avid military man, but this disgusts me. I hate politicians like you and this is exactly why eNOVA has NO political affiliations. Your bashing Ananias right now, but he's the one who keeps us making an attempt here in America. I've asked him several times to cut America off since you've given us nothing and have treated us terribly, but he's said no every single time. So I recommend that you step back, check yourself, and learn to appreciate help from your allies. We already watched you sacrifice your other allies after signing that peace treaty, so I would think you'd make attempt to not alienate everyone else that wants to help.
@President Emerick
"Hey Ananias, instead of making an inflammatory article filled with lies, why wouldn't you try talking to me?"
I did on IRC, I remember the conversation quite well. And there are no lies, just deep disappointment that eNOVA has been enjoined from partnering with the eUS Government for the benefit of the citizens. I never stated that your decision was wrong or right, just that I hoped that you would relent from your injunction and allow us to contribute our time and effort to our eUS projects.
"So Ananias, take your propaganda and shove it. I didn't reject eNOVA, you rejected me."
No, I did not...I stated that we would consider it, but that we also would also likely need some support in starting the companies as we had already invested heavily in the the mentoring programs that, at your request, we have stopped providing in the eUS.
Thank you for taking the time to comment, Mr. President, I appreciate that you are busy.
>You wanted to push your crap off onto us and we wouldn't do it
WHAT. No, you wanted to do our work. wtf is wrong with you.
>you want us to start expensive businesses that will make us no money so you don't have to
It's 20g. eNOVA wanted to start RW's that may or may not have failed. Either way, this is much less expensive and a sure-fire way to help.
>We have a mentor program in place that you could utilize, but instead you want to do it yourself for political points.
No, if I wanted political points, I would push it off on you, like you wanted me to, and say HEY GUYS I GOT IT DONE AREN'T I GREAT. You don't know politics very well, do you :/
>I hate politicians like you and this is exactly why eNOVA has NO political affiliations.
eNOVA is a political party without an eRepublik brand, really.
>Your bashing Ananias right now, but he's the one who keeps us making an attempt here in America
>your
Also, if Ananias wanted to help so badly, then he would have accepted the suggestions I made, or at least make an actual effort to talk to me. Instead, all he did was say, "Hey, I hear you don't want us to run our own mentor program," I confirmed, and he said "ok". If he wanted to help, he would have made an actual effort.
>you've given us nothing
Dimension said that same line, and I can't help but think of what you want me to give you if you're really the altruistic group that you're made out to be.
>We already watched you sacrifice your other allies after signing that peace treaty
Oh, you're just ignorant. I was wondering what was wrong with you. I haven't signed anything yet, and that treaty would let us fight for all of our allies. Why don't you talk about things that you know about, like legos.
As I said in my last comment, we didn't have a conversation, we exchanged 3 lines.
@ Emerick
I expressed the exact frustration all eNOVA members are feeling right now and have spoken nothing but the truth. I wish you the best of luck in the remainder of your Presidency and sincerely hope you didn't just get all of your allies killed.
@President Emerick
"As I said in my last comment, we didn't have a conversation, we exchanged 3 lines."
It was far more than that to my recollection as it included the dialogue regarding the mentor program, complete explanation of the issues related with 0 Hub companies, where our funds have been allocated, and my perspective regarding the value of investing in eUS citizens. It was actually quite a bit more detailed, Mr. President.
I talked to Dimension at length, not you. I don't remember talking to you about the mentor program that much.
why should the President let a private organization run a program the government already has in place, confusing people? Just because you're not in charge doesn't mean it's not working.
-j
ahhh so Exilious is what I suspect he was. Care to give us a link to that dead citizen?
Great article, voted and subscribed.
@James S. Pfeiffer: "why should the President let a private organization run a program the government already has in place, confusing people? Just because you're not in charge doesn't mean it's not working."
Not sure of your point James, but I never stated that the programs are not working. I stated that eNOVA was willing to help. For example, some discussion about supporting the Welcoming Committee was discussed (and rejected by the President), in that instance, we were willing to completely administrate the program with government oversioght and at our own expense for the mere compensation of recognition that eNOVA (which is member operated) was contributing to the effort in the form of a link to our forums for those interested in participating in eNOVA. That was the extent of the "control" which so many apologists are decrying.
And the more disappointing part is that all of this information is readily available to our forum visitors in some cases, and members in all cases...many of whom are directly engaged in the programs themselves. There is no effort to take over anything, just an effort to support the programs which benefit the eUS while maintaining our organizational integrity as a team.