America: Do you trust your peers?
Harrison Richardson
The contents of this article will not be very popular. People in this country favor a very peachy view of our situation at every turn, and many people will no doubt be upset when I tell the truth about our nation. As a one term President, I have no fear of alienating political allies or anyone else by merely telling the truth. I am going to use some examples, which I'm sure will tick some people off but will only further explain and improve upon the points I make in my article.
The truth is that we have a big problem in America. We have a massive "me versus you" ideology that follows us around just like our real life counterparts. I witnessed a budget debate last night where people on the same team forgot that simple fact and instead decided to attack each other. Whether it's SEES vs. non-SEES or non-military vs. military, you're a fool if you don't think it happens and you're a fool if you deny it's a problem. Why must we continue to bicker with these people on our side? Why must we spend our time engaging in these ideologically fallacious arguments with the very same people who run our country beside us?
For an example, from last night:
As we are discussing the next budget, which will span two months, we're talking about a raise to give to the military branches. It's well earned in every respect. However, the way it happened seemed to cause some problems. Three respected military members were the most vocal advocates for bumping up the budget by some x00 gold for mainly the military branches. I wasn't against it, but I wasn't sure the revenue numbers we had would hold; they were from a week with massive battles and I thought that they were inflated. These three military Congressmen seemed to be in lockstep and that caused concern from some other Congressmen.
These three congressmen did nothing wrong. They were advocating for a cause they believe in; however, because of their military affiliation while serving in Congress, some Congressmen (with reason) were skeptical of these reasons and felt that they were mindlessly advocating a route that benefited them personally and felt that such an action was improper.
Why wasn't this entire issue communicated better? Why was I forced to step in and act as a baby sitter? It's simple: one powerful side of our country didn't trust the other powerful side. Ever since the TC budget mishap a handful of months ago, the military has been distrusting of Congress. There are now a few exemplary military officers serving simultaneously in Congress. They serve with honor, but while the military doesn't trust Congress, Congress at some levels doesn't trust the military. And now, my friends, we have a turf war that involves egos more than anything else. I am not innocent in such turf wars either. I readily admit my ego and that it sometimes hurts us. I try to keep it in check and I rely upon my allies to help me in such a respect.
We have to work together and we have to trust each other.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOm1-tR5F4 - How about a song to fit the occasion?
You and me together, could do anything baby
You and me together yes yes
You and me toether, could do anything baby
You and me together, yes yes
We can always look back at what we did
Only memory of you and me baby
Right now its you and me forever girl
And you know we could do better than anything that we did
You know that you and me we could do anything
For an example from the politico sphere, the recent APF-SEES debacle is one. SEES, why can't you trust other parties to faithfully do their duties to defend us from a PTO? I'm sure you'll cite precedence, but I can remember many times during PP elections (Congress isn't the same) when parties have stepped up. APF, why can't you trust SEES to stick to their word? Have they ever not? We have to trust each other. America has the most dedicated citizens, one of the most powerful economies, one of the strongest mobile militaries, and the greatest minds on the planet. We can trash this game if we work together.
This is not a harp on the military article. It is not a harp on SEES article. It is not a harp on non-SEES article. It is a harp on America article. This is a problem that radiates from every level of every government sector and it harbors our advancement in the game. I am not innocent, the military is not innocent, Congress is not innocent, the level 10 new player is not innocent. As humans, we're looking to advance our own interests too often. As Americans, we're relating too much to real life and the polarized political landscape where two parties diverge from each other based more on ego than policy. We live every day in a real world where government branches are, rightfully, not trusting of each other: why do we feel a need to bring that in to this simple, quaint game?
Last night, I had a mini ragequit. I saw first hand in a budget debate two sides of great Americans seemingly fighting against each other instead of fighting with each other. We cannot keep forcing the President to act as babysitter-in-chief. There are real honest-to-god problems in this country that I will devote every waking hour to fix, including removing Serbia from Asia and improving retention rates, but I cannot focus on them if I'm forced to act as a mediator between two faux platoons within the massive army that is America. The next time that I'm raged to the point where my nick is HR|F**kyouall I suspect will be the same time I turn over my resignation to Congress.
I'm ready to work for you, America, Are you ready to work with me? Look at your neighbor; trust them just as you would trust your mother. We all want what is best for this country, so let's place a bit of faith in the person next to us and allow them to work side along side with us as we, as a team, remove all that is wrong from the World. If we don't, we will continue to turn our wheels in the mud and drop further and further from our rightful place as a world power.
You and me together, we could do anything.
HR
Comments
Top Gun is a awesome movie!
perta
\o/ o7 Mr. President
also epic long, sorry.
Boo-Yah!
'Murica
<0 Mr. president
Fantastic article, a great read.
Good read, voted. We do need to be a little more trusting.
You are 100% correct HR.
<O Mr. POTUS
USA, USA, USA \o/
This strangely makes sense.
Boo-Yah!
of course it does.
Your logic is logical
USA FTW!!
votado
Good read.
>the level 10 new player is not innocent
I'm going to go ahead and disagree with you on that part. Also, are you out now?
Out as being a proud American who isn't afraid to share his point of view?
Sure.
o7 I agree 100% Voted
Some of the dogmatic approaches on both sides are disturbing. In times like these where America is a high priority enemy target, we have to be strong on the inside or we'll never have a tough exterior. In a way we've had this before, and it took a full out invasion of our country to fix it. Let's hope we can fix this before it comes to that.
o/
"America has the most dedicated citizens, one of the most powerful economies, one of the strongest mobile militaries, and the greatest minds on the planet"
hell yeah!!!
This is the crap I got fed up with. Everyone is pulling for their own instead of working toward a common goal. It's been a problem in the eUS as long as I've played, except maybe during The Occupation
Thank you for writing this.
Boo-Yah!
Thank you for speaking the truth, HR. I have been sick of all the fighting lately and it's good our President feels the same way. I think it is what has been driving me further and further away from this game actually.
Obvious POTUS is POTUS
We need to get invaded.
o7
We need to get invaded. x2
Insult some serbian mothers, tell the russians "0111100010010101" and tell the indos, nvm. Just throw some gold at Mexico instead. We've never had so much fun as when Parter was selling his mom's house to take Florida, let's face it.
You sir, speak the truth. But the only thing some people will listen too is a swift kick in the nuts by some eastern Europeans.
Or attack WSR! We can worry about MPP's later.
This is the best article I have read in a long time. Thank you for putting my thoughts into words (and then putting it in a paper with subs 😛)
Voted with maximum force
Voted
Working together to achieve unilateral goals = brilliant!!!
USAroxx!
indeed
o7
hot chicks ftw \o/
In b4 all the people responsible for necessity of this article being created post about how much they agree
The eUS, just like the real life country, is build around excessive bureaucracy. If you'd just leave that model behind, and stopped role playing and scheming, and started to think what is actually good for America, not just for you, you'd be able to achieve what the real world US has not been able to - unity of thought and purpose.
You go Mr President!
How many people who caused this article to be written have already posted in agreement?
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rewriting-the-course-of-history-901672/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/rewr[..]/1/20
preach on prez
Nice article
your conclusion is corect
Respect!
voted hard.
There's a reason why the only time I ran for Congress was from France as part of a PTO. This article reminds me why in case I ever forget.
Unfortunately, leadership involves a lot of babysitting and ego-smoothing.
Would it be better if everyone could put aside their petty differences, stop nursing old grudges, and think in terms of serving the eNation?
Yes.
Sadly, that's not human nature.
I'm sorry to say it, but I'm afraid any President is going to find him or herself in the position of Babysitter in Chief.
Because the DMB mention...I will vote this, shout this, and love this. Also, this was a great article. Well-written...but mostly because of Dave. 🙂
Way to use the bully pulpit.
It seems unless our backs are against the wall, all we see is folks screwing each other whatever way they can to get an advantage. Just like in RL.
Seems too that there are a few here that aren't happy unless everyone is at each others throuts.