Akki: He Helped South Korea; Let's Help Him.
•
by Parrot
Hello. I'm Parrot, former congressman and president of South Korea. When the nation was still young and developing we had a monetary crisis; there was no KRW so no one could pay workers and thus no food could be created. I set up a method of currency distribution that provided businesses with the money that let people work. I also gave the citizens money who did not get jobs so they could afford food. After doing this, I continued to do what I felt right to keep South Korea on its feet, which included ousting a totalitarian regime that raised the income tax to 50% and minimum wage to 40 KRW, and then used the taxed funds to fund their own private business.
So, if anything, I felt like I've done a lot for South Korea and made it possible for a community of us to exist today.
However, now, we face a presidential election. And, while I myself am not native to Japan, I will be voting for Akki. When I was in South Korea and fighting against totalitarianism, Akki was there, supporting me in the fight against them. He defended me when everyone else in the country was brainwashed to despite me for objecting to the regime.
Furthermore, when we kicked the regime, he provided food to give out to the starving and had his people export food to us as all our businesses were out of whack due to the repressive laws. He put himself out there, needlessly, to help us.
Akki is a good man. He's helped South Korea in the past, and if my presidency had continued longer than before, I would have discussed freedom of Korean regions and MPPs with him, if possible.
I'm going to be voting for Akki in the election. Akki helped South Korea in our time of crisis. Now that we can repay him, let us do so.
Vote this up.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Aren't you a Theocrat? Who let you into this country?
I used to be a theocrat four months ago. I since quit. During the Korean elections, I gave my vote to OmarLittle, who was a South Korean candidate for Congressman. Since then, the Theocrats have reported me for a joke comment I made to them and had me temporarily banned.
What the theocrats have done to South Korea was evil and what they threaten to do to Japan is despicable. Japan and Akki have been good to South Korea, especially when I was president. I would never betray either.
Really? I recall some people in the last presidential election commented that Koreans should not be voting for President since they are not planning on being permanent citizens. Should you instead follow their wishes and abstain from voting for Akki?
You mean the Akki who "helped" eSK by telling PEACE that Japan would not be needing any tanking help against the Theocrats, even though he had no way of knowing at the time whether or not the retreat button would work. If that's what we're calling "help" these days, I'd hate to see what an actual hindrance looks like.
I was not part of those people, however, I did not support either candidate, so I voted after the election was decidedly slanted one way solely for the experience.
I do think South Koreans should vote in this election and get involved in Japanese politics. South Korea signed a merger with Japan. We are currently merged as one country. Ergo, I believe we should vote since this is our home away from home.
Furthermore, Akki has been good to us. I know he's been a good Japanese politician as well as good to South Korea. We owe Akki because he put himself out there to support us. If we can repay him by electing him president, so be it.
@Vorph.
What Akki did was understandable. If he had allowed PEACE to help, both Japan and South Korea would have owed them a debt of gratitude. He made a decision that proved to be right and in the interest of both our countries.
I wasn't aware PEACE operated on a barter system of favors. I thought it did the right thing for it's members without charging them for it.
It isn't. But, you can't expect a good deed to go unrewarded, can you?
Like, someone does something for you, what's to keep them from asking for something back? Sure, there's no initial trade agreement. But, you're obligated to do the favor after they've done something for you.
Brainwashing, is that what you think that was? I'd think the terms charismatic and logical would be more fitting to the Triumvirs.
I would request that if we have a logical conversation about them, you not use your Organization to talk.
But, brainwashing, yes. They controlled the media. They did not use Charisma, they used sheer political takeover. Furthermore, there logic was just a guise used to promote their own self.
In the end, we had countries threatening us from all sides. Remember, ATLANTIS embargoed us because of that.
Grizzly is Yonai Keiko, President of SK, and apparently a Brainwasher.
Parrot does have a dubious history, firstly of running 'The Party' in eSK that turned the country into a backwards Stalinist hellhole and then after being defeated he went off to be a Theocrat.
Since he turned up just before eSK independence (like may other carpetbaggers) he has confessed that he hasn't got anything to do with those ways anymore and is a reformed person though.
Although I don't rate his choice for President I think it good that he is joining in eJapanese society, the more active players we have the better.
Ehm
Just a question...
"I'm Parrot, former congressman and president of South Korea. "
Who voted you ad congressman and president?
Not theocrats, not fake Koreans.
So?
Akki wants SK to be free but poor and weak.
He doesn't want us to have any power in Japan or the local region, so that he can rule by himself.
Akki proved time and time again to have the greatest disdain for both South and North Koreans. He doesn't care about them, he just want them out of Japan and that is it. He sees them as a threat and an opposition to his thirst for power. If you genuinely confuse his greed for compassion, you've got some serious issues.
Bridges are being burnt all over the place...
"Men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all the other alternatives."
"You mean the Akki who "helped" eSK by telling PEACE that Japan would not be needing any tanking help against the Theocrats, even though he had no way of knowing at the time whether or not the retreat button would work. If that's what we're calling "help" these days, I'd hate to see what an actual hindrance looks like."
uhhhhh finally someone is admiting that you (esk) used a bug for your advantage.
Cool, finally the truth!
Thank you
A president can retreat the last region of his/her nation if such an event occurs within 6 hours of the battle starting.
@Alfagrem : lol, no other comment 😒
@Mazza : Your face! no other comment.
Again (it's boring, please learn to understand what you read)
The rules :
Retreat is disabled for the last region of a country. When multiple battles are fought in a region, the retreat option is available only for the battle which started first (if that battle is not a Resistance war). Presidents are able to retreat from battles only in the first six hours since the battles beginning.
http://wiki.erepublik.com/index.php/War_Tutorial" target="_blank">http://wiki.erepublik.com/index.php/War_[..]rial
It's really impossible to believe in the 2009 there're so many people that read and don't understand...
Its so hard to believe that in 2009 ther're so many people who don't have any sense of moral decency or even the ability to show some sort of compassion to those who make a mistake.