A Guide To... Romania's Foreign Policy

Day 319, 15:39 • Published in Romania USA • by Shadow Figure
Introduction - On Propaganda

This article it is not intended to change the public opinion about Romania. It is addressed to very active people around the world, involved in (or aiming to) leading their country.


Public opinion is controlled through propaganda, and in this matter Romania can’t even begin to compete with:

1. Angry Irish people. I can understand their attitude.

2. Hypocritical Goons. They were involved in taking over 3 countries (Greece, Turkey, Mexico, and the post as Mayor in Springfield, USA).
Plus, Romania is the one who kept Greece on the map for them, in the war with Turkey. Later Pakistan joined the war, back stabbing Turkey, founder country and member (together with Pakistan) of FIST alliance.
Now the goons and Pakistan, member of PEACE (the name is another example of their hypocrisy) are saying Romania is a back stabber! Read on.

2. Masters of propaganda, Dio’s people. They are bitter because ATLANTIS is probably the greatest alliance in the world.


World Powers

Now let’s take a look at the facts, disregarding the bullshit coming from all directions (Romania included). You might wonder how well my bullshit detector works. I trained it during the last 4 months, as I have been a very close person to the government of Romania, but a member in the best party in Romania who hadn’t won an election in a long time.


Short history: Alliances evolved and two very powerful groups were forme😛 ATLANTIS and PEACE, with strong tensions between them. Hungary (though it conquered Slovakia) and Bulgaria were always weaker countries near Romania, a country growing stronger and stronger, into a world power. An expansion war started by Romania was to be expected, and so was a World War 1. This was the Romania – Hungary war.

Now, some people think that until this point Romania was telling Bulgaria how good of friends they were and that they were allies. Bulgaria is also promoting this idea. Part of it WAS true. Romania was trying to consolidate it’s position as a world power going round Bulgaria since [a url=http://www.erepublik.com/profile-29763.html]Titu Maiorescu[/a] was President.

That’s one reason why Romania didn’t attacked Bulgaria, but Hungary. Even more, Bulgaria was involved in [a url=http://www.erepublik.com/profile-151182.html]Alex Craciun[/a] 's plan to conquer Hungary [fact]. Later on Bulgaria betrayed [fact] Alex, and told Hungary about what Romania was up to. So the plan failed. Nevertheless, as you know, Romania still attacked Hungary in a direct battle with PEACE. And ATLANTIS won.

So what Bulgaria is saying - that until THIS POINT Romania was telling Bulgaria how good friends they were and that they were allies - is out of date. THAT POINT passed over a month ago. So, again, the action against Bulgaria was to be expected. If Alex made a bad or good decision about that it’s NOT my point. And I don’t complain about Bulgaria’s foreign policy (which served well their own interests, so far). My point is that Romania was predictable in it’s foreign policy.


Victor Petrescu and Romania’s Foreign Policy

But there’s also [a url=http://www.erepublik.com/profile-299181.html]Victor Petrescu[/a] into the picture, so I must go back to Ireland. The government of Romania (and Alex Craciun who was President then) had NOTHING to do with (and no interest in) the take over of Ireland.

Victor is very smart and dangerous. He carefully recruited his men, from the employees of the companies he own’s in Romania. He also wrote top rated articles to recruit his men. Political take overs were later made renowned by Victor and the goons. So people in Romania knew Victor was up to something, but they didn’t knew what. Victor told me a few days ago that if he then had 120 men Hungary was his target; if he had 100 men – Bulgaria. He had 80 men so they went in Ireland.

Bottom line, Romania as a country and it’s government was not involved in Ireland. Even more, the public opinion in Romania about Victor’s actions is quite the same as the world public opinion. Don’t underestimate Victor Petrescu, he did it on it’s own.

As you can see, Victor’s presence in Bulgaria does NOT “confirm that he was always working with the Romanian government”. It’s true that he helped Romania in WW1, because he is still a Romanian, and also did it in Bulgaria (in Bulgaria things were more complicated, but I can’t say more about it).
BUT, Victor Petrescu can’t be controlled by Romania’s gouvernment, Alex Craciun, or the Romanian foreign policy. If you can call Dio a good, then you can say Victor is a vampire.


Conclusion: the Expected Foreing Policy

In conclusion, the Romanian government made good and maybe bad decisions regarding foreign policy. Maybe we were “pig-disgusting imperialists” but we were never back stabbers. And Romania does not have a plan to take over the world.

If you can see through the propaganda and bullshit coming from everyhwere (including from Romania) you can see that Romania’s actions were always predictable. And it’s also predictable that Romania will support it’s allies in ATLANTIS.



Regards,
pig-disgusting [a url=http://www.erepublik.com/profile-251421.html]Shadow Figure[/a]

PS. Also keep an eye on Romania to observe what will happen with the war and Slovakia. My personal opinion is that a peace treaty will be signed, and Slovakia will regain it’s independence. This would also be predictable.

Please VOTE this article.